FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W39608210> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W39608210 startingPage "322" @default.
• W39608210 abstract "There are two questions dominating the literature on tenure: (a) What is it?, and (b) What shall we do with it at the institutional level? (Hutcheson, 1998). Tierney & Bensimon (1996) interviewed over 300 candidates at twelve different institutions in an attempt to tell the story of and promotion in higher education; answering Hutcheson's first question. Facing Change: Building the Faculty of the Future (1999) is a report from a group sponsored by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU). The AASCU organized selected Washington, D.C.--based higher education associations and public education systems to undertake an exhaustive review of institutional policies that affect faculty. It was called the Faculty Review Project and defined as an effort to provide security if and when a professor wished to practice academic freedom that may or may not be controversial. It noted that somewhere along the way became equivalent with job security and a guarantee of continued employment. The group made fifty recommendations; among them were recapturing the obligations of tenure, adding more accountability to sabbaticals and incorporating part-time faculty members into the fabric of campus life. Charles Reed, Chair of the Faculty Review Project, offered that the report was the beginning of the answer to, so what should we do now? This addresses Hutcheson's (1998) second question; What should we do with it? The concept of is an integral part of the employment relationship between institutions of higher education and individual faculty members (Mawdsley, 1999). Promotion and decisions are often difficult and always have important long-term consequences for both the candidate and the institution (Rhoades-Catanach & Stout, 2000). As a colleague once observed, tenure establishes a marriage between a faculty member and the university where divorce is not an option! To underscore the importance of decisions several researchers have compiled guidance for those preparing for review. Diamond (1995) considers preparing for as one of the most difficult and challenging experiences a person can have. His preparation guide crosses disciplines and offers specific strategies for document preparation. Other writers address more specific disciplines. Westney (2000) addresses in relation to teaching and technology. Doost (2000) addresses and accountancy while Amy & Crow (2000) offer strategies regarding recognition of computers and composition in relation to and promotion. Stone (1996) offers eleven suggestions for Ph.D. students and assistant professors for managing their process. They are: 1. make a substantive research contribution to accountancy; 2. do research you love; 3. acknowledge, accept, and manage the nausea that accompanies writing; 4. do a lot of works; 5. learn the craft of publishing in academe; 6. learn which aspects of teaching matter and to whom; 7. with and benefit from one's colleagues; 8. and hope you are lucky; 9. manage paradigmatic clash; 10. reduce stress by cultivating free attention; and 11. learn to skillfully adapt to circumstances rather than carefully plan. Doost (2000) argues against items 3, 4 and 8. He feels that Professor Stone is wrong in comparing writing as a new faculty member and that of tedious, difficulty job of dissertation writing; referring to suggestion 3 and the notion that writing must be accompanied by nausea. Doost (2000) takes issue with suggestion 4 by arguing that we should conduct research that matters and not just whatever works. I agree with Doost (2000) and I also take issue with suggestion 8, work hard and hope you are lucky. Doost (2000) offers alternatives from his experiences in seeking tenure. …" @default.
• W39608210 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W39608210 creator A5066732689 @default.
• W39608210 date "2002-12-22" @default.
• W39608210 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W39608210 title "Promotion and Tenure Decisions Using the Boyer Model" @default.
• W39608210 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W39608210 type Work @default.
• W39608210 sameAs 39608210 @default.
• W39608210 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W39608210 countsByYear W396082102014 @default.
• W39608210 countsByYear W396082102015 @default.
• W39608210 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W39608210 hasAuthorship W39608210A5066732689 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C2777581918 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C2779304910 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W39608210 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C120912362 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C127413603 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C144024400 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C17744445 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C18762648 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C199539241 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C2776007630 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C2777581918 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C2779304910 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C3116431 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C39549134 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C78519656 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C94625758 @default.
• W39608210 hasConceptScore W39608210C98147612 @default.
• W39608210 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W39608210 hasLocation W396082101 @default.
• W39608210 hasOpenAccess W39608210 @default.
• W39608210 hasPrimaryLocation W396082101 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W182807861 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W1841949697 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W185695647 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2002992308 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2070697880 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2091916814 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2102879267 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2317285741 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2342697369 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W241985094 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2435117111 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2583688011 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W269825241 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2912607017 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W293155748 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W301436673 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W315344337 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W866331753 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W87917740 @default.
• W39608210 hasRelatedWork W2609807268 @default.
• W39608210 hasVolume "123" @default.
• W39608210 isParatext "false" @default.
• W39608210 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W39608210 magId "39608210" @default.
• W39608210 workType "article" @default.