FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W39712912> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W39712912 abstract "Judicial review of sensitive questions may be treated in a number of forms. Imagine a spectrum, at one end of which there is a barrier to any kind of intervention, such as an explicit norm withdrawing certain kinds of issues from the court's jurisdiction. At the other end, there is review for all questions. Only rarely do states and their judiciaries position themselves clearly at either of the spectrum's extremities, although examples can be found of both approaches i.e. the approach that constitutionally negates the possibility of review of issues, and the approach that regards questions as regular legal questions, hence admitting of review. Between the two extremities, there are some intermediate approaches. Each state gives its own particular response to the political doctrine, determining its place on the spectrum of review, based on its own specific balancing formula - the product of the specific variables of that state. These variables include the status of the court, its relative position in the system of state authorities, its power, and its degree of independence. It also depends on custom and culture. On a formal level it is also determined by normative and arrangements, which occasionally exclude defined areas from the court's jurisdiction.According to one of the intermediate possibilities, no barrier to intervention is found, and therefore it is incumbent on judges themselves to establish mechanisms that enable them to avoid adjudicating questions. This model draws very near to the end of the spectrum which prevents intervention in questions, and will henceforth be referred to as the non-justiciable approach.Another approach, closer to the position endorsing review, allows the judges themselves to establish criteria for intervention on questions, but the criteria established differ from the criteria applied in review of acts of other branches of government. This approach - of judicial self restraint - does not necessarily prevent review on questions, but the review is more restrained and more rarely exercised. While the judge may regard himself as authorized to adjudicate a certain question, given that he regards a certain question as justiciable, he may nonetheless reject a petition on its merits in view of its failure to satisfy certain criteria required for intervention. In this paper I argue that although the modern approach to questions in the court seems to be the judicial self restraint approach, this model should be reconsidered and its problems disclosed. Both approaches will be presented, while exemplifying an usually classified as a political issue in foreign systems: review of internal parliamentary procedures. In this issue, an examination of comparative law in states such as Israel, Germany, and Spain shows that the claim of non-justiciability has by and large been abandoned in favor of the constitutional review, exercised cautiously, with self-restraint. The central idea emerging from the case law is that the doctrine of supremacy dictates the overseeing of organs, even within the framework of their parliamentary activities, and even with respect to essentially questions." @default.
• W39712912 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W39712912 creator A5049520747 @default.
• W39712912 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W39712912 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W39712912 title "Political Questions in the Court: Is 'Judicial Self-Restraint' a Better Alternative than a 'Non Justiciable' Approach?" @default.
• W39712912 cites W4246232629 @default.
• W39712912 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1367596" @default.
• W39712912 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W39712912 type Work @default.
• W39712912 sameAs 39712912 @default.
• W39712912 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W39712912 countsByYear W397129122017 @default.
• W39712912 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W39712912 hasAuthorship W39712912A5049520747 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C191795146 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W39712912 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C11413529 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C118552586 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C144024400 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C15744967 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C17744445 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C190253527 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C191795146 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C199539241 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C2776211767 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C2776949292 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C2780665704 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C33923547 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C44725695 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C48103436 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C48764862 @default.
• W39712912 hasConceptScore W39712912C94625758 @default.
• W39712912 hasLocation W397129121 @default.
• W39712912 hasOpenAccess W39712912 @default.
• W39712912 hasPrimaryLocation W397129121 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W128558503 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W1506076036 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W1599305233 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W2353184236 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W2383692605 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W2393412391 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W3047284988 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W54330860 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W589940871 @default.
• W39712912 hasRelatedWork W3121604621 @default.
• W39712912 isParatext "false" @default.
• W39712912 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W39712912 magId "39712912" @default.
• W39712912 workType "article" @default.