FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W39827589> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W39827589 endingPage "6" @default.
• W39827589 startingPage "411" @default.
• W39827589 abstract "The measurement of nursing workload first began in the 1970s, because of the need for determining severity of illness and cost-effectiveness in the intensive care unit. In the following decades, the need for more specific tools for assessing nursing workload brought to the development of scoring systems more focused on nursing activities. We will briefly review the scoring systems validated since 1974. TISS-Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System elaborated by Cullen in 1974 is based on 57 therapeutic procedures and was designed to assess the severity of illness in the ICU. Each intervention scores 1 to 4. Patients are grouped in 5 classes. It was not sufficiently validated and was abandoned. However it first introduced the idea of patient point managed per nurse. TISS update was elaborated by Keene in 1983. The therapeutic procedures were increased to 76. It was assumed that a single nurse can manage 40/50 points per day. Though not validated, it became the most used tool to assess complexity of treatment and nurse/patient ratio. However many of these items are obsolete and frequently related to the severity of illness rather than to specific nursing interventions. PRN-Project Research of Nursing was elaborated by EROS during 1980-1987. Points are assigned to each nursing activity according to their frequency, duration, need for more than one nurse, etc. It results quite time consuming, thus unsuitable for routine use. OMEGA elaborated in 1986 describes 86 therapeutic interventions, grouped in 3 categories, measured at the end of ICU stay, thus representing a measure of global workload and use of resources. TOSS-Time Oriented Score System was elaborated by GIRTI in 1991. This score was studied and tested in Italy. It represents a direct temporal evaluation of nursing workload. The score is expressed in minutes. It is reliable and relatively simple, and has been validated on over 2 700 ICU patients. TISS 28 was elaborated by Miranda in 1996. It represents a simplified and updated version of the original TISS, proposed to assess the nursing workload. The authors stated that a nurse can deal with 46 points over the 24 hours. NEMS-Nine Equivalents of nursing Manpower use Score was elaborated by Miranda in 1997. It was derived from TISS and TISS28. Only 9 items, related to specific organ support, nursing and diagnostic/therapeutic interventions inside or outside the ICU, are considered. These items were weighted by multivariate analysis, obtaining a score comparable to the TISS28 score. Each nurse can deal with 45/50 points per day. NAS-Nursing Activity Score was elaborated by Miranda in 2003. It was derived from TISS28, aiming at the description of nursing activities not necessarily correlated to the severity of illness. It describes 81% of the nursing time, compared to 43% of TISS 28. In conclusion, many scoring systems have been proposed to describe nursing workload, both directly (as with TOSS and PRN) or through severity and complexity of treatment (TISS, TISS 28, NAS and NEMS). These scores represent the instruments to assess the correct use of ICU resources." @default.
• W39827589 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W39827589 creator A5000402446 @default.
• W39827589 creator A5025615220 @default.
• W39827589 creator A5041646503 @default.
• W39827589 creator A5059555810 @default.
• W39827589 date "2004-05-01" @default.
• W39827589 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W39827589 title "[The assessment of nursing workload]." @default.
• W39827589 cites W2003378032 @default.
• W39827589 cites W2021488025 @default.
• W39827589 cites W2120482140 @default.
• W39827589 cites W2156301104 @default.
• W39827589 cites W2094104281 @default.
• W39827589 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15181424" @default.
• W39827589 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W39827589 type Work @default.
• W39827589 sameAs 39827589 @default.
• W39827589 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W39827589 countsByYear W398275892012 @default.
• W39827589 countsByYear W398275892015 @default.
• W39827589 countsByYear W398275892017 @default.
• W39827589 countsByYear W398275892018 @default.
• W39827589 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W39827589 hasAuthorship W39827589A5000402446 @default.
• W39827589 hasAuthorship W39827589A5025615220 @default.
• W39827589 hasAuthorship W39827589A5041646503 @default.
• W39827589 hasAuthorship W39827589A5059555810 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C140117577 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C2780665704 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C2984889486 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W39827589 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C111919701 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C140117577 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C159110408 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C177713679 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C27415008 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C2776376669 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C2778476105 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C2780665704 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C2984889486 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C41008148 @default.
• W39827589 hasConceptScore W39827589C71924100 @default.
• W39827589 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W39827589 hasLocation W398275891 @default.
• W39827589 hasOpenAccess W39827589 @default.
• W39827589 hasPrimaryLocation W398275891 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W1521113230 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W1966193098 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W1999013518 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2000399215 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2003378032 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2014534755 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2030906783 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2037019658 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2038746872 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2039528557 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2048851293 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2072410090 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2084482642 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2115533758 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2120482140 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2145429345 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2156301104 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2164589136 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W3089344175 @default.
• W39827589 hasRelatedWork W2094104281 @default.
• W39827589 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W39827589 isParatext "false" @default.
• W39827589 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W39827589 magId "39827589" @default.
• W39827589 workType "article" @default.