FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W41963997> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W41963997 endingPage "180" @default.
• W41963997 startingPage "169" @default.
• W41963997 abstract "In Cri t ique o f Prac t ica l Reason (1788) Kant e labora tes on h is idea of f reedom. Accord ing to h im, f reedom is cognizable only through the awareness of the moral law. Therefore the moral law is the ra t io cognoscend i of f r eedo m, wh i l e the l a t t e r i s t he ra t io e s send i of the fo rme r . A l though such reciprocal substantiation sounds quite paradoxical, we can un derstand his idea when we look back on his Critique of Pure Reason (1781), examine the development of his conception of freedom and then put his statement in Critique of Practical Reason into its proper context. In this paper I explicate two types of Kant ’s concept of f reedom that are regarded as representing by turns the s tages of his phi losophical development: (1) practical freedom, (2) transcendental freedom. In the1770 ’s Kant mainly talked about the former and expected that he could manage with i t in hi s moral phi losophy. This expectat ion was also carried over into Critique of Pure Reason , as is typically found in the chapter ‘The canon of pure reason’ . Yet he also argued in Critique of Pure Reason about antinomy of pure reason and elaborated in consequence of the resolu t ion of the th i rd ant inomy the concept of t ranscendenta l f reedom in i t s p ro b a b i l i t y . O n a c c o u n t o f t h a t s o me p e o p l e d e s c r i b e C r i t i q u e o f P u r e R e a s o n a s a p a t c h w o rk . However, I argue in this paper that we can learn from the whole text of Critique of Pure Reason the d e c i s i v e d e v e l o p me n t o f K a n t ’ s t h i n k i n g o n f r e e d o m . N a me l y , p r a c t i c a l f r e e d o m i s c o mp l e t e l y e x c e l l e d b y t r a n s c e n d e n t a l f r e e d o m . T h e n I c o n s i d e r h o w h e c o u l d s u c c e e d i n d e m o n s t r a t i n g t r a n s c e n d e n t a l f r e e d o m i n i t s p e c u l i a r r e a l i t y . I n m y o p i n i o n K a n t d r e w f o r t h a t p u r p o s e i n Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) an important distinction between the hypothetical and categorical imperative. It was in consequence of this elaborate consideration that he could propose the reciprocal substantiation between the moral law qua categorical imperative and freedom in Critique of Practical Reason." @default.
• W41963997 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W41963997 creator A5064419387 @default.
• W41963997 date "2007-01-01" @default.
• W41963997 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W41963997 title "Moral Law as the Ratio Cognoscendi of Freedom in Kant's Philosophy" @default.
• W41963997 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W41963997 type Work @default.
• W41963997 sameAs 41963997 @default.
• W41963997 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W41963997 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W41963997 hasAuthorship W41963997A5064419387 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C2779103253 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C2780105918 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C2781413104 @default.
• W41963997 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C111472728 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C138885662 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C151730666 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C17744445 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C199539241 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C27206212 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C2779103253 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C2779343474 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C2780105918 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C2781413104 @default.
• W41963997 hasConceptScore W41963997C86803240 @default.
• W41963997 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W41963997 hasLocation W419639971 @default.
• W41963997 hasOpenAccess W41963997 @default.
• W41963997 hasPrimaryLocation W419639971 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W1498903680 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W1540813654 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W1972406319 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2007141686 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2078887819 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2140055954 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2319882592 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2348082797 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2351240247 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2358631628 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2359105198 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2361411892 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2367995876 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2369520593 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2371969141 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2374878065 @default.
• W41963997 hasRelatedWork W2383243001 @default.
• W41963997 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W41963997 isParatext "false" @default.
• W41963997 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W41963997 magId "41963997" @default.
• W41963997 workType "article" @default.