Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200084920> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4200084920 endingPage "4551" @default.
- W4200084920 startingPage "4551" @default.
- W4200084920 abstract "Most studies confirm the beneficial effects of enteral nutrition on the quality of life, but some studies indicate an inverse association and its detrimental impacts. However, there are insufficient data on the effects of enteral nutrition on the quality of life of cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to describe the influence of applied enteral nutrition on the quality of life of cancer patients, based on the results of randomized controlled trials. It was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021261226) and conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. The searching procedure was conducted using the PubMed and Web of Science databases, as well as Cochrane Library, and it included studies published until June 2021. It was conducted to select randomized controlled trials assessing the influence of enteral nutrition (compared with the other model of nutrition) on the quality of life of cancer patients. A general number of 761 records were screened and a final number of 16 studies were included in the systematic review. The studies were included and assessed by two independent researchers, while the risk of bias was analyzed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Studies compared patients treated with and without enteral nutrition, patients treated with various methods of enteral nutrition or with enteral diets of various content, as well as patients treated with enteral and parenteral nutrition. Within the included studies, the majority were conducted in patients with cancers located in various parts of the body, or diverse areas within the gastrointestinal system, while some studies were conducted in specific populations of patients with a defined cancer location-esophagus, stomach, or ovary. The duration of applied enteral nutrition within the included studies was diversified-from two weeks or less to half a year or even more. The vast majority of studies used well-known and validated tools to assess the quality of life, either developed for a specific group of head/neck, esophagus/stomach, and ovary cancer patients or developed for more general patient populations. Most studies concerning patients treated with and without enteral nutrition supported applying enteral nutrition, which was concluded in seven studies out of ten (including four studies with a low risk of bias). The other important observations to be emphasized-formulated based on the studies with a low risk of bias-presented the role of oral supportive nutrition guided by a dietitian, as well as the beneficial role of enteral and parenteral nutrition, combined. In spite of a relatively low number of randomized controlled trials assessing the influence of enteral nutrition on the quality of life of cancer patients, which should be considered as a limitation, the results were promising. Most studies supported the positive influence of enteral nutrition on the quality of life, either assessed based on the psychological measures of the quality of life or by considering the other potential determinants (e.g., malnutrition, complications, etc.). Taking this into account, enteral nutrition should be applied whenever possible, both to prevent and treat malnutrition in cancer patients. However, considering the limited number of studies conducted so far, further research conducted in homogenic populations of patients is necessary." @default.
- W4200084920 created "2021-12-31" @default.
- W4200084920 creator A5000058532 @default.
- W4200084920 creator A5002179103 @default.
- W4200084920 creator A5057740662 @default.
- W4200084920 creator A5059049938 @default.
- W4200084920 creator A5080738254 @default.
- W4200084920 date "2021-12-19" @default.
- W4200084920 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W4200084920 title "Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Receiving Enteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials" @default.
- W4200084920 cites W1537308241 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W1993095302 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W1998617484 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2029206859 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2035838265 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2036813453 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2050206200 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2052105223 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2052921232 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2057045703 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2060270486 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2063724909 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W207172261 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2073491310 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2175749847 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2189595983 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2253152305 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2256527514 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2402703084 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2472194737 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2548279972 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2583292750 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2608990585 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2619975858 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2706197370 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2760881678 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2891505890 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2922430335 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2940802066 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2944546139 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2947499078 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2970490020 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W2979350124 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3001935830 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3012163479 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3012933411 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3087287185 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3089064573 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3090170978 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3124409238 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3126693526 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3128382642 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3128646645 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3134947523 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3136551177 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3161536564 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W3172406588 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W4211216570 @default.
- W4200084920 cites W4294215472 @default.
- W4200084920 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13124551" @default.
- W4200084920 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34960103" @default.
- W4200084920 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W4200084920 type Work @default.
- W4200084920 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W4200084920 countsByYear W42000849202023 @default.
- W4200084920 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4200084920 hasAuthorship W4200084920A5000058532 @default.
- W4200084920 hasAuthorship W4200084920A5002179103 @default.
- W4200084920 hasAuthorship W4200084920A5057740662 @default.
- W4200084920 hasAuthorship W4200084920A5059049938 @default.
- W4200084920 hasAuthorship W4200084920A5080738254 @default.
- W4200084920 hasBestOaLocation W42000849201 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C2776478404 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C44315111 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConcept C78722104 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C126322002 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C159110408 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C168563851 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C17744445 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C177713679 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C189708586 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C199539241 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C2776478404 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C2779473830 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C2779951463 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C44315111 @default.
- W4200084920 hasConceptScore W4200084920C535046627 @default.