FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200260435> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200260435 abstract "Abstract Purpose: We compared the difference in postoperative patency rates due to the differences in the diameter of silicone tubes used for bicanalicular intubation for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO). Methods: Patients diagnosed with NLDO at Ehime University Hospital between August 2013 and November 2020 who underwent endoscopic-assisted nasolacrimal duct intubation (ENDI) were included in the study. The patients involved were 130 cases and 157 sides (age 72.6 ± 11.3 years) who were eligible for follow-up for more than six months after the removal of the lacrimal silicone tube. The postoperative recurrence rate was compared retrospectively based on the difference in tube caliber. The patients were divided into two groups: those intubated with a 1.5-mm large diameter tube (Group LD) and those with a 1.0-mm normal diameter tube (Group ND). The survival rates of the two groups at one year after tube removal were compared by Kaplan-Meier's curve and Restricted mean survival time (RMST) method with τ = 365 days. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, or observation period after tube removal between the two groups. Meanwhile, the preoperative occlusion period was significantly longer in the ND group. The recurrence rate after tube removal was significantly lower in the LD group (12 / 85 sides, 14.1%) compared to the ND group (27 / 72 sides, 37.5%) (p = 0.001). The patency rate at one year after removal of the lacrimal tube was 0.857 (0.754-0.919) in the LD group and 0.739 (0.617-0.828) in the ND group. In comparing patency rates by the RMST method at τ = 365 days, the RMST difference, RMST ratio, and RMTL ratio were significantly higher in the LD group at p = 0.045, 0.052, and 0.046, respectively. Conclusion: Regarding the bicanalicular silicone tube intubation, the patency rate at one year after removal was significantly higher in the thicker tubes with a diameter of 1.5 mm compared with that of a diameter of 1.0 mm for the treatment of NLDO." @default.
• W4200260435 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200260435 creator A5002108814 @default.
• W4200260435 creator A5015432576 @default.
• W4200260435 creator A5045250535 @default.
• W4200260435 creator A5062213024 @default.
• W4200260435 creator A5088279976 @default.
• W4200260435 date "2021-12-20" @default.
• W4200260435 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4200260435 title "Comparison of the efficacies of 1.0mm and 1.5mm silicone tubes for the treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction" @default.
• W4200260435 doi "https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1182481/v1" @default.
• W4200260435 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200260435 type Work @default.
• W4200260435 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4200260435 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4200260435 hasAuthorship W4200260435A5002108814 @default.
• W4200260435 hasAuthorship W4200260435A5015432576 @default.
• W4200260435 hasAuthorship W4200260435A5045250535 @default.
• W4200260435 hasAuthorship W4200260435A5062213024 @default.
• W4200260435 hasAuthorship W4200260435A5088279976 @default.
• W4200260435 hasBestOaLocation W42002604351 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2775942659 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2776268601 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2776283816 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2779190853 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2779769944 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2781296607 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C2781432121 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C141071460 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C178790620 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C185592680 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2775942659 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2776268601 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2776283816 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2778716859 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2779190853 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2779769944 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2781296607 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C2781432121 @default.
• W4200260435 hasConceptScore W4200260435C71924100 @default.
• W4200260435 hasFunder F4320334764 @default.
• W4200260435 hasLocation W42002604351 @default.
• W4200260435 hasLocation W42002604352 @default.
• W4200260435 hasOpenAccess W4200260435 @default.
• W4200260435 hasPrimaryLocation W42002604351 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W152671824 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W1991605022 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2072445420 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2077269328 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2408418022 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2410649719 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2945509943 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W3006418548 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W3029531817 @default.
• W4200260435 hasRelatedWork W2583778028 @default.
• W4200260435 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4200260435 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4200260435 workType "article" @default.