FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200324917> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200324917 endingPage "413" @default.
• W4200324917 startingPage "406" @default.
• W4200324917 abstract "<p id=p00005>The effect of social media on executive functions remain controversial. Some studies have shown that the use of social media promotes an individual’s executive functions, and some studies have found that social media use has a negative impact on executive functions. Recent studies have shown that, there may be an inverted U-shaped relationship between social media use and individual's executive function, and that social media use does not necessarily impair or promote executive function, but there is an optimal tipping point between the two. Moderate-intensity use of social media is the best level to promote executive functions. This is related to the moderating role played by the intensity of use. The paper first introduces the behavioral evidence that the effect of social media on executive functions, including three parts: positive effects, negative effects, and inverted U-shaped relationships. Secondly, it analyzes the moderating effect of intensity of use in the inverted U-shaped relationship between social media use and executive functions, and attempt to reveal the debate over the pros and cons of social media use on executive functions. Moderate-intensity use of social media will produce a social media flow experience, allowing individuals to filter out various distracting information when faced with various complex information stimuli in social media, focusing on useful information, and target information is constantly being affected. With storage and update, the individual's executive functions (especially the shifting function) get long-term and repeated exercise under such requirements, and finally improve. In addition, the flow experience generated by the use of social media can be used as an intrinsic motivation to increase the interaction of social networks to make positive changes in interpersonal relationships. This provides individuals with continuous social rewards and emotional support. To a certain extent, it buffers the negative impact of excessive use of social media on cognitive function, and slows down the decline of age-related executive functions. However, high-intensity use of social media causes individuals to worry about their performance in the task, which tends to maintain a wider range of attention and is more susceptible to interference from irrelevant information, while low-intensity use of social media causes individuals to be in a state of lack of proactiveness, the psychological effort process of information processing is reduced or even disappeared, which has a negative impact on executive functions. <p id=p00006>Future research in this area should examine the dose-effect of social media use affecting executive functions. The positive impact of social media use on the executive function may require a relatively long and continuous process of using social media. Whether an optimal social media can be determined the level of media usage maximizes individual's executive functions? In addition, previous research mainly focuses on the impact of social media usage frequency on individual's executive functions in daily life, but lacks a single sub-component of the type of social media usage on the executive function investigation of development and changes. In the future, the relationship between different types of social media usage and sub-components of executive function should be further clarified. Finally, the lifting effect of social media may be more significant in groups whose brain structure is in a period of change. Most previous studies only show that the use of social media can change individual's neural pathways or brain response patterns (and little is known about whether changes in the physiological structure of executive function have an impact on the cognitive level of social media users. Future research should combine behavioral and cognitive neurological methods to examine the brain regions of social media users with different cognitive levels in performing specific tasks. The difference in activation makes the neural mechanism of social media use affecting executive function more precise and comprehensive." @default.
• W4200324917 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200324917 creator A5001386996 @default.
• W4200324917 creator A5051660560 @default.
• W4200324917 creator A5062721013 @default.
• W4200324917 creator A5075177270 @default.
• W4200324917 date "2022-02-01" @default.
• W4200324917 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4200324917 title "The impact of social media on executive functions: Beneficial or harmful?" @default.
• W4200324917 cites W1964596829 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W1967936712 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W1970977400 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W1977966042 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2007651260 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2014369806 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2017201127 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2019370496 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2037431939 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2037934073 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2048645272 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2051884740 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2062078646 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2079620095 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2082478716 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2087948978 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2088253065 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2093288575 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2102168858 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2121001699 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2142816615 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2146078360 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2149869836 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2152899683 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2158559484 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2163089896 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2167020848 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2172048197 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2300872908 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2317960594 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2402992121 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2415638773 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2538533981 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2551102515 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2563631710 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2582824676 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2592064429 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2742310947 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2748074762 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2759595435 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2772207122 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2782898231 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2785659664 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2790049070 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2796470896 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2886427183 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2892941802 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2900873920 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2921374582 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2922150719 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2942151403 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2975614958 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W2986306632 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W3081857856 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W3094488817 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W3095623676 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W4237499609 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W4238879677 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W4246142195 @default.
• W4200324917 cites W649741917 @default.
• W4200324917 doi "https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2022.00406" @default.
• W4200324917 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4200324917 type Work @default.
• W4200324917 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4200324917 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200324917 hasAuthorship W4200324917A5001386996 @default.
• W4200324917 hasAuthorship W4200324917A5051660560 @default.
• W4200324917 hasAuthorship W4200324917A5062721013 @default.
• W4200324917 hasAuthorship W4200324917A5075177270 @default.
• W4200324917 hasBestOaLocation W42003249171 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C169900460 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C2775968953 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C112930515 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C136764020 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C144133560 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C15744967 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C169760540 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C169900460 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C180747234 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C2775968953 @default.
• W4200324917 hasConceptScore W4200324917C41008148 @default.

• next