FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200326421> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200326421 abstract "The use and implementation of novel tools for malaria control such as long lasting impregnated bednets (LLINs) and Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) over the last decade has contributed to a substantial reduction in malaria burden globally. However numerous challenges exist particularly in relation to vector control in emergency settings. This study seeks to explore expert opinion on the utility of existing tools within the emergency context setting and to better understand the attitude towards emerging and innovative tools (including Genetically Modified Mosquitoes) to augment current approaches.80 experts in the field of malaria and vector control were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi survey. They were selected through a combination of literature (academic and policy publications) review and snowball sampling reflecting a range of relevant backgrounds including vector control experts, malaria programme managers and emergency response specialists. The survey was conducted online through a questionnaire including the possibility for free text entry, and concentrated on the following topics: 1. Utility and sustainability of current vector control tools, both in and outside emergency settings 2. Feasibility, utility and challenges of emerging vector control tools, both in and outside emergency settings 3. Current and unmet research priorities in malaria vector control and in malaria control in general.37 experts completed the first round and 31 completed the second round of the survey. There was a stronger consensus about the increased utility of LLIN compared to IRS in all settings, while insecticide-treated covers and blankets ranked very high only in emergency settings. When considering the combination of tools, the ones deemed most interesting always involved LLINs and IRS regardless of the setting, and the acceptability and the efficacy at reducing transmission are essential characteristics. Regarding perceptions of tools currently under development, consensus was towards improvement of existing tools rather than investing in novel approaches and the majority of respondents expressed distrust for genetic approaches.Malaria vector control experts expressed more confidence for tools whose efficacy is backed up by epidemiological evidence, hence a preference for the improvement rather than the combination of existing tools. Moreover, while several novel tools are under development, the majority of innovative approaches did not receive support, particularly in emergency settings. Stakeholders involved in the development of novel tools should involve earlier and raise awareness of the potential effectiveness amongst a wider range of experts within the malaria community to increase acceptability and improve early adoption once the evidence base is established." @default.
• W4200326421 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200326421 creator A5010562643 @default.
• W4200326421 creator A5041258357 @default.
• W4200326421 creator A5070232225 @default.
• W4200326421 creator A5071745416 @default.
• W4200326421 creator A5074357118 @default.
• W4200326421 date "2021-12-01" @default.
• W4200326421 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4200326421 title "Malaria vector control tools in emergency settings: What do experts think? Results from a DELPHI survey" @default.
• W4200326421 cites W1566590255 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2014617181 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2024349624 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2042790389 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2559797886 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2590531652 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W2888140011 @default.
• W4200326421 cites W3030220438 @default.
• W4200326421 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-021-00424-y" @default.
• W4200326421 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34930378" @default.
• W4200326421 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200326421 type Work @default.
• W4200326421 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4200326421 countsByYear W42003264212023 @default.
• W4200326421 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200326421 hasAuthorship W4200326421A5010562643 @default.
• W4200326421 hasAuthorship W4200326421A5041258357 @default.
• W4200326421 hasAuthorship W4200326421A5070232225 @default.
• W4200326421 hasAuthorship W4200326421A5071745416 @default.
• W4200326421 hasAuthorship W4200326421A5074357118 @default.
• W4200326421 hasBestOaLocation W42003264211 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C106399304 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C138816342 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C152060993 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C165801399 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C203014093 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2776120307 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2778048844 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2778371730 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2779495148 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2779985137 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C2780346216 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C80962145 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C106399304 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C111919701 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C119599485 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C127413603 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C138816342 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C142724271 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C152060993 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C154945302 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C159110408 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C165801399 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C166957645 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C203014093 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C205649164 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2776120307 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2778048844 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2778371730 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2779343474 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2779495148 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2779985137 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C2780346216 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C41008148 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C60641444 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C71924100 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C80962145 @default.
• W4200326421 hasConceptScore W4200326421C99454951 @default.
• W4200326421 hasFunder F4320307843 @default.
• W4200326421 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4200326421 hasLocation W42003264211 @default.
• W4200326421 hasLocation W42003264212 @default.
• W4200326421 hasLocation W42003264213 @default.
• W4200326421 hasOpenAccess W4200326421 @default.
• W4200326421 hasPrimaryLocation W42003264211 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W1848777915 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2130491952 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2319704006 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2725492038 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2729424649 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2732470798 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2772682174 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2783261905 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W2920989938 @default.
• W4200326421 hasRelatedWork W3035899750 @default.
• W4200326421 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W4200326421 isParatext "false" @default.

• next