Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200330852> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 55 of
55
with 100 items per page.
- W4200330852 endingPage "215" @default.
- W4200330852 startingPage "201" @default.
- W4200330852 abstract "One of the contemporary views formulated and popularized mainly by authors from the socalled critical theory of law is the belief in the inevitable, mutual relationship of law (theory of law and dogmatics of law) and legal practice (adjudication) with politics and the political. This position is strengthened by the observation of contemporary disputes — especially visible in Poland — with the participation of politicians and lawyers: politicians accuse lawyers of political motivation of actions taken to defend the judiciary and the rule of law, while lawyers defend themselves by arguing the need for autonomy of their professional practice, including its apolitical nature. In this text, I explain the arguments of the latter party to the dispute. I choose the dogmatics of law as the field of illustrating the issues raised, since it occupies a special place in the continental legal scholarship, acting as an intermediary between the jurisprudence and legal decision-making practice. I am trying to show — by referring to two examples from general history, i.e. the eleventh-century investiture controversy and the nineteenth-century debate in the background of the German reunification idea — that law and politics (lawyers and politicians) have always been forced to compete and cooperate with each other. Thus, it confirms the thesis of the critical theory of law. At the same time, however, I try to show that the legal community had the ability to “learn” from the political disputes of the past, which led to the formation of independent jurisprudence and legal practice in the face of current politics, and thus also to apoliticality. What is more, I argue that such an apolitical nature is a condition for the survival of legal culture in its present shape — and here, my path diverges from the critical legal theory claims. However, in my opinion, the contemporary arguments made within this theory about the political science of law and jurisprudence should be treated with all seriousness — as another experience from which our community, as one can hope, will be able to draw informative conclusions." @default.
- W4200330852 created "2021-12-31" @default.
- W4200330852 creator A5073431077 @default.
- W4200330852 date "2021-12-27" @default.
- W4200330852 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W4200330852 title "Dogmatyka prawa wobec politycznej opresji. Czy historia myśli prawnej może nas czegoś nauczyć?" @default.
- W4200330852 doi "https://doi.org/10.19195/2300-7249.43.2.11" @default.
- W4200330852 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W4200330852 type Work @default.
- W4200330852 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4200330852 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4200330852 hasAuthorship W4200330852A5073431077 @default.
- W4200330852 hasBestOaLocation W42003308521 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C100701532 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C131330614 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C162040827 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C170692843 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C204434341 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C100701532 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C131330614 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C144024400 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C149209484 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C162040827 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C170692843 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C17744445 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C199539241 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C204434341 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C71043370 @default.
- W4200330852 hasConceptScore W4200330852C94625758 @default.
- W4200330852 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4200330852 hasLocation W42003308521 @default.
- W4200330852 hasOpenAccess W4200330852 @default.
- W4200330852 hasPrimaryLocation W42003308521 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W106430493 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W1571557737 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W2364249670 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W2365439053 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W2366198378 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W2927634584 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W2952887355 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W4244652911 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W4306367168 @default.
- W4200330852 hasRelatedWork W591006505 @default.
- W4200330852 hasVolume "43" @default.
- W4200330852 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4200330852 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4200330852 workType "article" @default.