Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200388518> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4200388518 endingPage "187" @default.
- W4200388518 startingPage "170" @default.
- W4200388518 abstract "Recently income inequality has been growing in many countries, and it is one of the biggest economic and social problems. The International Monetary Fund, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and other organizations stress the importance of this issue. According to Atkinson, Brandolini (2009), changes in income inequality show whether a particular society becomes more egalitarian over time or not, in which socio-economic direction it progresses.Even countries with similar economic structures differ in the level of income inequality and, according to Stiglitz (2015), differences in income inequality are related to policy decisions. The decisions of countries may depend on the prevailing view if markets are efficient or inefficient. In the first case, countries tend to rely more on neoliberal economic doctrine, and in the second, on the welfare state, where the role of government is more active (Stiglitz, 2017). However, it is observed that the growing income inequality is related to the growing role of the financial market, i.e. the phenomenon of financialization, which weakens the role of government. Thus, assessing the impact of financialization on income inequality is an actual topic of scientific debate.The results of studies, assessing the impact of financialization on income inequality, are mixed. Some financialization dimensions, such as financial liberalization, banking / financial crises increase income inequality, but microfinance intensity reduces income inequality. The contradictory results can be explained by the fact that research samples differ, various indicators reflecting the financialization are used, different independent variables are included in the regression equations.Studies have also been conducted in groups of countries that belong to different welfare state regimes (Josifidis, Mitrović, Supić, Glavaški, 2016; Dafermos, Papatheodorou, 2013). These studies emphasize that the level of income inequality is related to the efficiency of the social security system, i.e. income inequality is lower in Social–democratic welfare state regime (inherent universal social services and benefits) and Conservative–corporatist welfare state regime (social security model related to employment status) groups of countries than in the Mediterranean welfare state regime (characterized by the fragmentation of the social security model) and Liberal welfare state regime (inherent the specificity of the social security model, there is no universality) groups of countries. However, there is a lack of research that assesses the impact of financialization on income inequality in different welfare state regime groups of countries. The research problem: what is the impact of financialization on income inequality, is this impact the same in different EU welfare state regime groups? The object of the research - the impact of financialization on income inequality. The aim of the research is to assess the impact of financialization on income inequality in EU country groups.Research methods: analysis of scientific literature, grouping, generalization, regression analysis of panel data.When assessing the impact of financialization on income inequality in different welfare regimes EU country groups during the period 1998-2017, the least-squares regression analysis method of the panel data was used. The conducted research confirms the hypothesis and clearly shows that financialization, measured both by financial development index and domestic credit to the private sector, increases income inequality in all groups of countries. Thus, it shows that the role of the financial market is growing and financialization processes are contributing to the growth of income inequality in all groups of welfare regime countries and may reduce the role of government. These results are in line with Stiglitz, 2012; Razgūnė, 2017; Dünhaupt, 2014; Golebiowski, Szczepankowski, Wisniewska, 2016; Palley, 2008) who analyzed the relationship between financialization and growing income inequality. However, the study of Dabla-Norris et al. (2015), by contrast, find that the ratio of domestic credit to GDP in developed countries reduces income inequality." @default.
- W4200388518 created "2021-12-31" @default.
- W4200388518 creator A5054920952 @default.
- W4200388518 creator A5084839668 @default.
- W4200388518 date "2021-12-14" @default.
- W4200388518 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4200388518 title "Impact of Financialization on Income Inequality in Aspect of Welfare" @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1491036122 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1496668565 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1685969511 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1965450787 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1970745733 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1992860743 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1993037995 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W1999510028 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2000882070 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2015399443 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2017290898 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2021003681 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2071313917 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2086337525 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2091909900 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2092326447 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2111289196 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2146016148 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2165961741 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2168299087 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2299609985 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2315015348 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2333588187 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2341631846 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2380650883 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2384729007 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2513638773 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2551331811 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2582961643 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2625475872 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2703278808 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2770144537 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2806314124 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2884963073 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2903283196 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2953973447 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2987454830 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W2988757404 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3002216277 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3023059212 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3031910649 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3037095421 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3039967891 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3040050756 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3042036339 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3044076351 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3122264331 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3122271455 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3122539596 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3122953781 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3125572328 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3127241113 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3187474578 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W4242772786 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W4245127150 @default.
- W4200388518 cites W3113807508 @default.
- W4200388518 doi "https://doi.org/10.15388/soctyr.44.2.11" @default.
- W4200388518 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W4200388518 type Work @default.
- W4200388518 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4200388518 countsByYear W42003885182022 @default.
- W4200388518 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4200388518 hasAuthorship W4200388518A5054920952 @default.
- W4200388518 hasAuthorship W4200388518A5084839668 @default.
- W4200388518 hasBestOaLocation W42003885181 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C129603779 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C132000672 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C145236788 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C2780837152 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C34447519 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C45555294 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C47768531 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C513380476 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C556758197 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C129603779 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C132000672 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C134306372 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C145236788 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C162324750 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C17744445 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C199539241 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C2780837152 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C33923547 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C34447519 @default.
- W4200388518 hasConceptScore W4200388518C45555294 @default.