Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200408746> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4200408746 endingPage "105031" @default.
- W4200408746 startingPage "105031" @default.
- W4200408746 abstract "Rehabilitation of endodontically treated premolars with extensive coronal destruction through endocrown approach remains a controversial topic in reconstructive dentistry. There is no clear consensus in the literature which endocrown design with which material is the most effective restoration option for severely-destructed endodontically treated premolars. The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary first premolars restored with a novel endocrown system compared to the conventional one varying the applied load type through finite element and in vitro analyses.For finite element analysis, two models representing two endocrown systems used for restoration of severely-destructed endodontically treated maxillary first premolar tooth were generated: Model C for the conventional monolithic IPS e.max CAD endocrown and Model P for the novel bi-layered endocrown (PEKKTON ivory coping veneered with cemented IPS e.max CAD). Modified von Mises stress values on the remaining tooth structure, cement lines and restorative materials were evaluated separately under axial and oblique loading of 450 N. For in vitro analysis, forty sound human bifurcated maxillary first premolars were collected, endodontically-treated, and divided into 2 main groups (n = 20) according to the system used for endocrown fabrication; Group C: the conventional monolithic endocrowns and Group P: the novel bi-layered endocrowns. All specimens were subjected to an artificial thermomechanical aging protocol. Each main group was subdivided into two subgroups (n = 10) according to the loading type (axial and oblique) applied during the fracture resistance test. Qualitative analysis using Stereomicroscopy and Scanning Electron Microscopy was performed. Data were statistically analyzed at p-value ≤ 0.05.Regarding stress distribution pattern of remaining tooth structure (enamel and dentin), both endocrown systems and cement lines under both axial and oblique load application, Model P resulted in lower stresses than Model C. The oblique stress values of all analyzed structures were higher than corresponding values resulted axially. Considering failure load, a significantly higher load was recorded for Group P when axial or oblique loading was applied (p = 0.00). A significantly higher failure load was recorded with axial loading for both main groups. With regard to failure mode, a statistically significant difference was observed between main groups (p = 0.033), with more favorable failures detected for Group P axially.Compared to the conventional endocrown system, the studied novel system improved the biomechanical behavior within tooth/restoration complex of the restored severely-destructed endodontically treated maxillary first premolar teeth, whatever the applied load type.The novel endocrown system using a PEKK coping veneered with cemented IPS e.max CAD can be considered a favorable promising option for restoration of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth, with more protection for residual tooth structure. It can be considered as a conservative alternative option to the conventional treatment modalities not only for normal clinical conditions, but also for parafunctional cases." @default.
- W4200408746 created "2021-12-31" @default.
- W4200408746 creator A5027231588 @default.
- W4200408746 creator A5034055115 @default.
- W4200408746 creator A5035981306 @default.
- W4200408746 creator A5047035574 @default.
- W4200408746 creator A5090194296 @default.
- W4200408746 date "2022-02-01" @default.
- W4200408746 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4200408746 title "Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses" @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2001038122 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2008620576 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2027252503 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2041824043 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2083220148 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2093886830 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2133780757 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2156459242 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2159659519 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2286247121 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2500723655 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2520984607 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2522099470 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2524468415 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2541693361 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2551443435 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2562291892 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2575293521 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2588340739 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2612578952 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2704492546 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2751345248 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2766721206 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2767004973 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2767677696 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2768713886 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2772886388 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2773124219 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2777524411 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2781103538 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2789222201 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2789406458 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2805741715 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2808417238 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2808851151 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2883730123 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2885760350 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2895138110 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2895707872 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2909032028 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2911296211 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2944352573 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2969834345 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W2991507417 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3006654522 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3008518001 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3029366145 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3030950199 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3039024478 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3135179826 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W3198993621 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W4247813015 @default.
- W4200408746 cites W4250808544 @default.
- W4200408746 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105031" @default.
- W4200408746 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34922296" @default.
- W4200408746 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4200408746 type Work @default.
- W4200408746 citedByCount "8" @default.
- W4200408746 countsByYear W42004087462022 @default.
- W4200408746 countsByYear W42004087462023 @default.
- W4200408746 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4200408746 hasAuthorship W4200408746A5027231588 @default.
- W4200408746 hasAuthorship W4200408746A5034055115 @default.
- W4200408746 hasAuthorship W4200408746A5035981306 @default.
- W4200408746 hasAuthorship W4200408746A5047035574 @default.
- W4200408746 hasAuthorship W4200408746A5090194296 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C135628077 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C155165730 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C126838900 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C127413603 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C13483470 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C135628077 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C155165730 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C192562407 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C199343813 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C202271784 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C2780641865 @default.
- W4200408746 hasConceptScore W4200408746C29694066 @default.