FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200468612> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200468612 endingPage "e3954" @default.
• W4200468612 startingPage "e3954" @default.
• W4200468612 abstract "Sir, We would like to thank Expósito-Campos and D’Angelo for their letter1 in response to our systematic review.2 The first remark in their letter criticizes the adequacy of the search strategy. On this matter, we followed the PRISMA guidelines and a comprehensive search strategy was designed and conducted by an experienced librarian and the study’s principal investigator using the PICO framework (participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes). Additionally, a controlled vocabulary and defined keywords were used to search for relevant studies; this is exhibited in Supplemental Digital Content 1.2 Regarding the inclusion of the study conducted by Jiang et al,3 it was included because it complied with the selection criteria which was clearly stated in our methods section.2 Certainly, the objective of the study in mention was “to review their experience performing gender-affirming vulvoplasty and to determine which factors influenced patient choice or surgeon recommendation of vulvoplasty, as well as to assess the patient’s satisfaction or regret with this choice.”3 Therefore, based on authors’ discretion and agreement, it was concluded that the study referred to regret with the choice of undergoing the procedure.4 As it occurred with other studies, the cohort size did not represent the sample used in our systematic review, as some patients did not undergo gender-affirming surgery (GAS). For instance, in the study by Wiepjes et al,5 we identified only those patients who underwent gonadectomy, which is considered part of the GAS spectrum. The calculations were as follows: [(adults transwomen, 75.3% × 3809 patients = 2868.1 patients) + (adults transmen, 83.8% × 1624 patients = 1360.9 patients) + (adolescents transwomen, 79.5% × 330 patients = 262.3 patients) + (adolescent transmen, 77.2% × 482 patients = 372.1 patients)]. Regarding the quality of included data in this review, Expósito-Campos and D’Angelo claimed there was “lack of controlled studies, incomplete follow-up, and lack of valid assessment measures.” It must be highlighted that a systematic review with meta-analysis is a type of secondary study in which the researchers use already published data in primary studies. Nonetheless, for the qualitative and quantitative synthesis, patients were not included if they did not undergo GAS, in an endeavor to minimize the risk of bias. Furthermore, as stated in the letter, we specified the limitations of our review and a thorough assessment of the risk of bias was conducted, so readers were provided with adequate tools to objectively evaluate the outcomes of included studies. In conclusion, we strongly believe that this study is of very high-quality and adds important and relevant information to the literature despite the observations stated in the letter. DISCLOSURE The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article." @default.
• W4200468612 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5005395288 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5011362332 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5011514152 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5019468497 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5022729371 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5040999640 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5050347696 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5075233984 @default.
• W4200468612 creator A5085211151 @default.
• W4200468612 date "2021-11-01" @default.
• W4200468612 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4200468612 title "Reply: Regret after Gender-affirmation Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence" @default.
• W4200468612 cites W2770117783 @default.
• W4200468612 cites W2793123770 @default.
• W4200468612 cites W2801914099 @default.
• W4200468612 cites W3136702627 @default.
• W4200468612 cites W3211639308 @default.
• W4200468612 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000003954" @default.
• W4200468612 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35028263" @default.
• W4200468612 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200468612 type Work @default.
• W4200468612 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4200468612 countsByYear W42004686122023 @default.
• W4200468612 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5005395288 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5011362332 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5011514152 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5019468497 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5022729371 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5040999640 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5050347696 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5075233984 @default.
• W4200468612 hasAuthorship W4200468612A5085211151 @default.
• W4200468612 hasBestOaLocation W42004686121 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C109359841 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C50817715 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C109359841 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C118552586 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C119857082 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C142724271 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C15744967 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C17744445 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C189708586 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C199539241 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C27415008 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C2779473830 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C41008148 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C50817715 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C71924100 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C77805123 @default.
• W4200468612 hasConceptScore W4200468612C95190672 @default.
• W4200468612 hasIssue "11" @default.
• W4200468612 hasLocation W42004686121 @default.
• W4200468612 hasLocation W42004686122 @default.
• W4200468612 hasLocation W42004686123 @default.
• W4200468612 hasLocation W42004686124 @default.
• W4200468612 hasLocation W42004686125 @default.
• W4200468612 hasOpenAccess W4200468612 @default.
• W4200468612 hasPrimaryLocation W42004686121 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2098995101 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2122489679 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2550419422 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2945536231 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W2964601175 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W3092753388 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W4328101666 @default.
• W4200468612 hasRelatedWork W4380423232 @default.
• W4200468612 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W4200468612 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4200468612 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4200468612 workType "article" @default.