FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200512035> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200512035 endingPage "703" @default.
• W4200512035 startingPage "675" @default.
• W4200512035 abstract "Purpose In today's competitive industries, the selection of best suitable maintenance strategy is dependent on large number of quantitative and qualitative factors, and it becomes an extensively difficult problem for maintenance engineers. Over the years, a diverse range of solution methodologies have been developed for solving this multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. In this paper, the authors have presented a comprehensive review of latest maintenance strategy paradigms and solution approaches proposed for the selection of an appropriate strategy in various industries. It would provide a systematic mapping of developments in this field and identify some research gaps to explore further studies. Design/methodology/approach A systematic state-of-the-art comprehensive literature review on maintenance strategy paradigms and selection approaches is presented in this study. In this study, 87 research articles published in peer-reviewed journals, since year 2012, are reviewed. Findings For the selection of a suitable maintenance strategy, a variety of criteria are considered to better evaluate the alternatives. In this study, contemporary strategies are discussed, and their applications in different industries are also depicted. Moreover, through the analysis of extant literature, critical criteria are selected and classified in six major categories (namely, economic, technical, safety, environmental, feasibility and social) and further sub-categorized in quantitative and qualitative classes. These clusters of criteria can be helpful as an initial set of criteria for survey and then case- or industry-specific criteria can be shortlisted for further alternative evaluation. Practical implications From the perspective of maintenance managers, maintenance management can be a very difficult task, considering the numerous factors affecting the decision-making process. In order to help in the decision-making process, this study presents the contemporary maintenance strategies in a systematic manner. In a previous study (Kothamasu et al ., 2006), these strategies were classified into repair and prevent classes only. With the developments of autonomous maintenance and design out maintenance (DOM), it was fair to include continuous improvement class. It will help managers and practitioners to identify, according to organization policy, appropriate maintenance strategy alternatives for the asset. A benchmark set of state-of-the-art maintenance strategies are laid out with their applications. The industrial case studies discussed in this study summarizes the optimal maintenance strategies for respective industries. Also, most critical criteria are identified from the existing studies for various industries that can help maintenance practitioners in acknowledging the critical factors and making appropriate decisions. Evaluation parameters for the maintenance strategy selection (MSS) generally conflict with each other, and considering the difficulty of quantifying the qualitative measures, it is a challenging task to determine the optimal trade-off. In order to overcome these challenges, popular MCDM approaches, demonstrating effective results across different industries are discussed with their limitations and applications. Decision-makers can refer this study to identify best suitable decision-making technique for the MSS problem in the industry of their choice. Maintenance managers and engineers can refer the case studies illustrated in Tables 1 and 2 to analyse the MSS techniques proposed by previous studies with industry-specific applications. Social implications This study is an attempt to provide a reference point for research scholars interested in the field of maintenance management and/or development of maintenance strategy framework. This study provides a critical state-of-the-art review of efforts made in the field of MSS. The prominent maintenance strategies being implemented in contemporary industries are discussed with respective case studies. Interested researchers and academicians can familiarize themselves with these strategies and their distinct features in this study. In order to guide future studies and provide a reference point for academicians, MSS critical criteria used in extant literature are identified and classified into a comprehensive benchmark framework. Moreover, the industrial case studies are discussed with the most critical criteria of MSS for different industries and which strategy is most suitable for the respective industries based on these criteria. Table 1 presents different MCDM techniques and their hybrid applications for solving MSS problem that can help researchers in identifying research gaps. Future research can be directed at addressing the limitation of MCDM approach employed in existing studies and comparing the differences in results obtained by the proposed approach. Different industrial case studies with considered maintenance strategy alternatives are presented in Table 2, which can help researchers in identifying the industries that have not been studied yet. Moreover, not all of the existing studies are carried out by considering all the presented benchmark strategies, which can be addressed in future studies by interested researchers. More detailed discussion on research gaps is presented in the following section. Originality/value From the analysis of the extant literature, the authors could observe that the decision-making process adopted in numerous studies was limited to the classical maintenance strategies and not inclusive of aggressive maintenance strategy alternatives. To overcome these limitations and help maintenance managers in the decision-making, this study depicts the contemporary maintenance strategies, critical evaluation criteria and MCDM frameworks (employed to solve the MSS problem with industrial case studies) in a structured manner." @default.
• W4200512035 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200512035 creator A5025233001 @default.
• W4200512035 creator A5049717391 @default.
• W4200512035 creator A5050393688 @default.
• W4200512035 creator A5089460587 @default.
• W4200512035 date "2021-12-30" @default.
• W4200512035 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4200512035 title "Maintenance strategy selection: a comprehensive review of current paradigms and solution approaches" @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1552425446 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1600885870 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1748537427 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1844859201 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1916371616 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1932478633 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1947287879 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1964515263 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1969039191 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1973208282 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W1992618549 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2001961981 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2002131242 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2002202035 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2009953374 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2014954284 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2017350305 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2020407132 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2020851875 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2022253718 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2022394275 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2025874826 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2033201429 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2035854859 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2040204945 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W204720349 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2049279861 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2057992654 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2061697414 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2065020290 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2071574349 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2072956260 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2078198101 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2081338955 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2083070668 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2088969703 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2100508758 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2100648759 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2104491115 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2120074999 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2120796331 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2129924558 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2140635263 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2140656103 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2150040599 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2189123562 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2209831645 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2293539323 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2468476129 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2472072542 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2517997486 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2523841832 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2564772290 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2576066704 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2593519057 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2603066586 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2603676342 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2607488865 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2609597778 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2612801499 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2623373572 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2752449909 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2754284082 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2754318853 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2759373267 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2762982230 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2768968142 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2771274608 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2772627815 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2775626717 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2779088879 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2779106815 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2784262026 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2785231063 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2793062918 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2793498253 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2804349852 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2805480525 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2805832423 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2809951469 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2826107020 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2889764609 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2890846056 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2903988579 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2904360720 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2909593351 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2912419115 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2935302257 @default.
• W4200512035 cites W2947945474 @default.

• next