FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200517144> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200517144 abstract "The Brazilian public health system does not include computed tomography angiography (CTA).Rank, according to the Brazilian public health system, the cost-effectiveness of different strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), combining exercise tests (ET), myocardial scintigraphy (MS), stress echocardiography (SE), and CTA in a hypothetical intermediate pre-test probability cohort of patients.This study implemented a cost-effectiveness analysis through a decision tree. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and net benefit were analyzed by adopting multiple thresholds of willingness to pay, from 0.05 to 1 GDP per capita per correct diagnosis. In sequential tests, a second confirmatory test was performed only when the first was positive.After excluding dominated or extended dominance diagnostic strategies, the efficiency frontier consisted of three strategies: ET, ET followed by SE, and SE followed by CTA, the last being the most cost-effective strategy. Through the net benefit, the ranking of the most cost-effective strategies varied according to willingness to pay.Using current concepts of health technology assessment, this study provides a ranking for decision-making concerning which diagnostic strategy to use in a population with an intermediate pre-test risk for CAD. With a feasible cost estimate adopted for CTA, the impact of including this to the list of the diagnostic arsenal would represent a cost-effective strategy in most of the evaluated scenarios with broad variations in the willingness to pay.Atualmente o sistema de saúde público brasileiro (SUS) não contempla a angiotomografia de coronárias.Ranquear sob a perspectiva do SUS, a custo-efetividade de estratégias diagnósticas combinando teste ergométrico, cintilografia miocárdica, ecocardiograma por estresse e angiotomografia de coronárias para o diagnóstico de doença arterial coronariana em uma coorte hipotética de pacientes com probabilidade pré-teste intermediária.Análise de custo-efetividade por meio de árvore de decisão. Foram analisados a relação de custo-efetividade incremental e o benefício líquido em saúde das estratégias diagnósticas, com a adoção de múltiplos limiares de disposição a pagar entre 0,05 e 1 PIB per capita por diagnóstico correto. Nos casos de testes sequenciais, um segundo teste confirmatório era realizado quando o primeiro fosse positivo.Após exclusão das estratégias diagnósticas dominadas ou com dominância estendida, a fronteira de eficiência foi composta por três estratégias: teste ergométrico, teste ergométrico seguido de ecocardiograma de estresse, e ecocardiograma de estresse seguido de angiotomografia de coronárias, sendo esta última a estratégia mais custo-efetiva. Pelo critério do benefício líquido, o ranqueamento das estratégias mais custo-efetivas variou conforme a disposição a pagar.Utilizando conceitos atuais de avaliação de tecnologias em saúde, este estudo fornece um ranqueamento para a tomada de decisão sobre qual estratégia diagnóstica utilizar, em uma população com risco pré-teste intermediário para DAC. Com estimativa factível de custos para a ATC, o impacto da inclusão desta ao rol do arsenal diagnóstico representaria uma estratégia custo-efetiva na maioria dos cenários avaliados nas variações de disposição a pagar." @default.
• W4200517144 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5008354085 @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5030900895 @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5038824806 @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5056951691 @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5067775312 @default.
• W4200517144 creator A5087665620 @default.
• W4200517144 date "2021-12-22" @default.
• W4200517144 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4200517144 title "Análise da Custo-Efetividade da Angiotomografia Coronariana no SUS, em Comparação com Outros Métodos Não Invasivos na Suspeita de DAC Estável" @default.
• W4200517144 cites W1536111430 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W1589085990 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W1968752583 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W1977188271 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2011924614 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2012815850 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2043715434 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2126900802 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2132259559 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2149755434 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2160133249 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2186191235 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2314717478 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2345622040 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2398815310 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2539125704 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2551080140 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2558041288 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2602944801 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2613911730 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2746924517 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2756578555 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2892274298 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W2950758574 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W3011371150 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W3014025744 @default.
• W4200517144 cites W3023668533 @default.
• W4200517144 doi "https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20201050" @default.
• W4200517144 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35137778" @default.
• W4200517144 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200517144 type Work @default.
• W4200517144 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4200517144 countsByYear W42005171442022 @default.
• W4200517144 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5008354085 @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5030900895 @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5038824806 @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5056951691 @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5067775312 @default.
• W4200517144 hasAuthorship W4200517144A5087665620 @default.
• W4200517144 hasBestOaLocation W42005171441 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C174446222 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C105795698 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C112930515 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C126322002 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C174446222 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C2778213512 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C3019080777 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C33923547 @default.
• W4200517144 hasConceptScore W4200517144C71924100 @default.
• W4200517144 hasLocation W42005171441 @default.
• W4200517144 hasLocation W42005171442 @default.
• W4200517144 hasLocation W42005171443 @default.
• W4200517144 hasLocation W42005171444 @default.
• W4200517144 hasLocation W42005171445 @default.
• W4200517144 hasOpenAccess W4200517144 @default.
• W4200517144 hasPrimaryLocation W42005171441 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W1987807347 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W2042629756 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W2059961661 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W2471376028 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W2737884982 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W4220660297 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W4233159467 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W4237125075 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W4306659497 @default.
• W4200517144 hasRelatedWork W2994454448 @default.
• W4200517144 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4200517144 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4200517144 workType "article" @default.