FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200536734> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200536734 endingPage "582" @default.
• W4200536734 startingPage "558" @default.
• W4200536734 abstract "Purpose This study aims to investigate the drivers and impact of balanced scorecard (BSC) usage on organizational effectiveness in manufacturing companies. The objectives of the paper were to assess the organizational factors affecting the usage intensity of the BSC; the relative benefits of BSC determining its adoption speed; and the extent to which BSC usage enhances organizational effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a survey research design. Data collection was through a structured questionnaire administered on senior accounting/ finance personnel of 300 manufacturing companies that are members of the Manufacturers Association of Nigeria. Binary logistic regression analysis, discriminant analysis and structural equation modeling (maximum likelihood estimation method) were used to analyze survey data obtained from 104 BSC adopters. Findings Result shows that the three organizational factors affecting BSC usage intensity are affiliation to a foreign entity, availability of specialist skills and business strategy (strategic pattern). The strongest predictor is, however, the availability of specialist skills. The strongest determinants of the BSC adoption speed are the need for financial stability and the importance of customer feedbacks. The impact of BSC usage on organizational effectiveness is positive, statistically significant but weak. The inability of BSC usage to contribute appreciably to organizational effectiveness is attributable to the lack of integration among the performance measures in the BSC framework and the shallow usage rate of BSC. Practical implications Although it is commendable that financial stability and customer satisfaction strongly drive BSC adoption speed, the low rating recorded by other factors related to product development, employee development and process improvement suggests that the performance measures in the BSC framework are not used in an integrative manner. This also confirms that the BSC, like other innovative management accounting techniques, is applied at a rudimentary level by organizations in Nigeria. Originality/value The current study contributes to knowledge by exposing the organizational factors and relative benefits driving BSC adoption. It provides empirical evidence on why the BSC may not deliver the optimal benefit of improving organizational effectiveness despite its popularity and potential as an integrated performance measurement (IPM) apparatus that can add value to organizations. The paper adds to the scarce literature on IPM in developing countries. Drawing from the result that availability of specialist skills is the strongest predictor of BSC usage intensity, the practice of enmeshing the management accounting function with general accounting/finance should be discouraged." @default.
• W4200536734 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200536734 creator A5007890672 @default.
• W4200536734 creator A5009798572 @default.
• W4200536734 creator A5077069070 @default.
• W4200536734 date "2021-12-03" @default.
• W4200536734 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4200536734 title "Balanced scorecard usage and organizational effectiveness: evidence from manufacturing sector" @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1495743381 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1501970797 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1511556222 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1554975561 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1963898805 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1965085721 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1973239977 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1975678246 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1981703709 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1983859340 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1984419858 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1987927552 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W1997324745 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2001579773 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2001856752 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2006760876 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2023126868 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2026580201 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2042406586 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2045047776 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2053274948 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2053342166 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2078616363 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2088058866 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2092065924 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2093271243 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2105202260 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2121915517 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2131814102 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2143842866 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2160394127 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2166114521 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2243101543 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2262074981 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2553827065 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2566123347 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2584338306 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2731177864 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2738422167 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2744930307 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2780699056 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2807208438 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2912330120 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2952150209 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W2979810867 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3010781574 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3023594695 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3025873937 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3041535127 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3044575369 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3121695977 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3123124570 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3126134481 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3138112443 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W3167200741 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W348494760 @default.
• W4200536734 cites W4238485280 @default.
• W4200536734 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/mbe-01-2021-0005" @default.
• W4200536734 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200536734 type Work @default.
• W4200536734 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4200536734 countsByYear W42005367342022 @default.
• W4200536734 countsByYear W42005367342023 @default.
• W4200536734 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200536734 hasAuthorship W4200536734A5007890672 @default.
• W4200536734 hasAuthorship W4200536734A5009798572 @default.
• W4200536734 hasAuthorship W4200536734A5077069070 @default.
• W4200536734 hasBestOaLocation W42005367342 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C141571065 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C165672731 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C199004533 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C119857082 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C141571065 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C144133560 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C162324750 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C162853370 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C165672731 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C195094911 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C199004533 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C21547014 @default.
• W4200536734 hasConceptScore W4200536734C41008148 @default.

• next