FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200540935> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200540935 abstract "Background We undertook a prospective qualitative study to ascertain the perceptions and experience of trainee doctors in the first two years of formal core surgical training related to patient safety improvement and incident reporting. We sought to explore the beliefs, knowledge and opinions of core surgical trainees related to patient safety improvement, their understanding of existing patient safety initiatives and their experience and attitudes to incident reporting. Methods We identified 1133 doctors in formal core surgical training posts in the United Kingdom at this time, and we contacted these doctors to invite them to participate in our study. We received responses from 687 (60.6%) core surgical trainees, and 612 trainees (54%) agreed to participate. The study participants underwent an interview using structured questions asked by trained assessors with an opportunity to explore any particular themes identified by the trainee in more detail. Qualitative data related to the knowledge, experience and perceptions of safety improvement and incident reporting were collected. Results Overall, 163 surgical trainees (26.6%) reported that they felt that they could impact patient safety positively. A total of 222 trainees (36.3%) had been involved in or witnessed an adverse patient safety event, while 509 trainees (83.2%) reported that they had witnessed a 'near-miss' event. Only 81 trainees (13.2%) had submitted a patient safety report at some point in their career. In addition, 536 trainees (87.6%) reported that they considered a patient safety or incident report to be 'negative' or 'seriously negative' and that they would be discouraged from making these because of the negative connotations associated with them. Of the 81 core surgical trainees who had submitted a patient safety report, only nine trainees (11.1%) reported that they had received a meaningful reply and update following their report. Several themes were identified during the interviews in response to open questions. These included a perception that patient safety improvement is the responsibility of senior surgeons and managers and that surgical trainees did not feel empowered to influence patient safety improvement. Trainees expressed the view that incident reporting reflected negatively on clinicians and the standard of care provided, and there were reports of culture based on blame and the fear of litigation or complaints. Surgical trainees did not feel that incident reporting was an effective tool for patient safety improvement, and those trainees who had made patient safety reports felt that these did not result in change and that they often received no feedback. Conclusions Core surgical trainees report that they are not well engaged in patient safety improvement and that their perceptions and experience of incident reporting are not positive. This represents a missed opportunity. We suggest that in order to recruit the surgical workforce to the improvement work and learning associated with patient safety, opportunities for focused education, training and culture change are needed from the early years of surgical training. In addition, improvements to the processes and systems that allow trainees to engage with safety improvement are needed in order to make these more user-friendly and accessible." @default.
• W4200540935 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5006328692 @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5024400874 @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5035918799 @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5061103334 @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5088394333 @default.
• W4200540935 creator A5089270513 @default.
• W4200540935 date "2021-12-12" @default.
• W4200540935 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4200540935 title "The Perceptions and Experience of Surgical Trainees Related to Patient Safety Improvement and Incident Reporting: Structured Interviews With 612 Surgical Trainees" @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2120710757 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2124717344 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2138134325 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2151417645 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2154972397 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2582953839 @default.
• W4200540935 cites W2899851719 @default.
• W4200540935 doi "https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20371" @default.
• W4200540935 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34926092" @default.
• W4200540935 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4200540935 type Work @default.
• W4200540935 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4200540935 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5006328692 @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5024400874 @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5035918799 @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5061103334 @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5088394333 @default.
• W4200540935 hasAuthorship W4200540935A5089270513 @default.
• W4200540935 hasBestOaLocation W42005409351 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C206713868 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C2779240384 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C2909164965 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConcept C77595967 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C127413603 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C144024400 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C15744967 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C159110408 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C160735492 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C162324750 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C169760540 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C187736073 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C190248442 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C206713868 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C26760741 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C2779240384 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C2779328685 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C2909164965 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C36289849 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C50522688 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C509550671 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C512399662 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C71924100 @default.
• W4200540935 hasConceptScore W4200540935C77595967 @default.
• W4200540935 hasLocation W42005409351 @default.
• W4200540935 hasLocation W42005409352 @default.
• W4200540935 hasLocation W42005409353 @default.
• W4200540935 hasOpenAccess W4200540935 @default.
• W4200540935 hasPrimaryLocation W42005409351 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W1045266 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W14752472 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W15402570 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W2627193 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W34857 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W394998 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W5217710 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W5467796 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W8837906 @default.
• W4200540935 hasRelatedWork W9913310 @default.
• W4200540935 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4200540935 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4200540935 workType "article" @default.