FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200542851> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200542851 endingPage "667" @default.
• W4200542851 startingPage "661" @default.
• W4200542851 abstract "In France, the family and friends of a patient with a psychiatric disorder can legally be involved in the decision to involuntary admission to psychiatry through care at the request of a third party. This involvement has been questioned in recent years, notably to protect this third party. The main objective of this work was to assess whether providing the third party with information on care without consent when providing care at the request of a third party (SDT) had an impact on the third party's experience. The secondary objectives were to identify other factors that might impact the third party's experience of the SDT, and to assess the impact of the SDT on the relationship between the third party and his or her hospitalized relative, as well as the factors that might influence it.The study was based on a questionnaire, constructed after meeting several members of an association of relatives of patients with psychiatric disorders : UNAFAM. This questionnaire questioned the context of hospitalization, the information provided concerning care without consent, the experience of the third party at the time of hospitalization and at a distance, and the impact of hospitalization on the relationship between the third party and his or her hospitalized relative, both at the time of hospitalization and at a distance. This questionnaire was then sent to UNAFAM members in three randomly selected regions. It was specified that it was only intended for people who had already been a third party during SDT. The results were received anonymously.Among the 166 respondents, 85 (51.2 %) had received information about involuntary admission, and there was more frequent relief at the time of hospitalization (P<0.01) and at a distance (P<0.01), and less frequent feelings of violence towards their loved one at a distance from hospitalization (P=0.02) compared to those who had not received information. The negative impact of hospitalization on the relationship between the third party and their hospitalized relative was lower (P=0.04) among third parties who received information. The fact that the doctor was perceived as being mainly responsible for the decision to hospitalize also preserved the third party's experience and relationship with his or her relative. However, third parties who understood their involvement as an administrative necessity reported less frequent relief (P=0.01), and the negative impact of hospitalization on their relationship with their relative was higher (P=0.01). Conversely, the fact that they felt integrated into the care and listened to by the health care team was correlated with a better experience of the situation by the third party, and a lesser negative impact of hospitalization on the relationship between the third party and their relative.Providing information to the third party about involuntary admission at the time of an SDT could improve his or her experience of the situation and limit the negative impact of hospitalization on his or her relationship with his or her loved one. Although it seems important for the third party to feel that the majority of the decision to hospitalize is made by the physician, including him/her in this decision could improve his/her experience of the situation and limit the negative impact of hospitalization on the relationship between the third party and his/her family member." @default.
• W4200542851 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200542851 creator A5006667484 @default.
• W4200542851 creator A5046899115 @default.
• W4200542851 creator A5053370274 @default.
• W4200542851 creator A5053794941 @default.
• W4200542851 date "2022-12-01" @default.
• W4200542851 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4200542851 title "Les soins psychiatriques à la demande d’un tiers : le point de vue du tiers" @default.
• W4200542851 cites W1758155006 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W1990731351 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2002140802 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2016399573 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2048716606 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2088298098 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2110594206 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2158970655 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2509418525 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2567987949 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2751009737 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2757731570 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2795925392 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W2913410344 @default.
• W4200542851 cites W3006105776 @default.
• W4200542851 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2021.08.008" @default.
• W4200542851 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34872705" @default.
• W4200542851 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4200542851 type Work @default.
• W4200542851 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4200542851 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200542851 hasAuthorship W4200542851A5006667484 @default.
• W4200542851 hasAuthorship W4200542851A5046899115 @default.
• W4200542851 hasAuthorship W4200542851A5053370274 @default.
• W4200542851 hasAuthorship W4200542851A5053794941 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C2983583741 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C108827166 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C118552586 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C151730666 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C15744967 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C159110408 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C2779343474 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C2983583741 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C41008148 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C512399662 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C71924100 @default.
• W4200542851 hasConceptScore W4200542851C86803240 @default.
• W4200542851 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W4200542851 hasLocation W42005428511 @default.
• W4200542851 hasLocation W42005428512 @default.
• W4200542851 hasOpenAccess W4200542851 @default.
• W4200542851 hasPrimaryLocation W42005428511 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W1842739385 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W2314207822 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W4200542851 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W4200542851 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W4200542851 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4200542851 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4200542851 workType "article" @default.