FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4200569081> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4200569081 endingPage "258" @default.
• W4200569081 startingPage "250" @default.
• W4200569081 abstract "There is no consensus regarding the range of immobilization in the conservative treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs). Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcome of patients with DRFs treated conservatively with below- or above-elbow immobilization.Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, two independent reviewers searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in April 2020; a subsequent update search was conducted in April 2021. We identified all randomised controlled trials comparing two immobilization methods in DRFs. The primary outcome measures were the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) or QuickDASH questionnaire scores in the short- and long-term (≤ and >six weeks, respectively) follow-up as well as the treatment failure rate. The secondary outcome measures were radiographic outcome, patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) score, pain score and adverse events. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the quality of evidence.The initial search revealed 1,775 records, and ten studies with 909 participants in total were included. There was no significant difference in DASH score in the short-term follow-up (4.99 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.45 lower to 0.46 higher; very low certainty) and treatment failure (risk ratio: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.40; low certainty). A clinically irrelevant but significant mean difference (0.83 lower, 95%CI: 1.64 lower to 0.03 lower; low certainty) was found in the DASH score in favour of below-elbow immobilization in the long-term follow-up. The overall risk of bias in DASH scores was high based on the measurement bias. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in secondary outcome measures.This meta-analysis did not demonstrate clinically meaningful difference between below- and above-elbow immobilization in terms of DASH score both in the short- and long-term follow-ups. However, overall certainty of evidence was considered very low, based on the very serious risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Hence, there is a need for further higher quality research.UMIN000040134 (4/14/2020)." @default.
• W4200569081 created "2021-12-31" @default.
• W4200569081 creator A5036697602 @default.
• W4200569081 creator A5049520100 @default.
• W4200569081 creator A5059114107 @default.
• W4200569081 creator A5085500443 @default.
• W4200569081 creator A5086096117 @default.
• W4200569081 date "2022-02-01" @default.
• W4200569081 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4200569081 title "Below- or above-elbow immobilization in conservative treatment of distal radius fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4200569081 cites W1521037341 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W1981658722 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W1985720858 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W1987563302 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2014793281 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2018240443 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2042143209 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2047719321 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2066314060 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2067103275 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2083609360 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2104675861 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2107021177 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2112048881 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2113271199 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2121040707 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2126930838 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2149059085 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2155422887 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2187653576 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2566496632 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2593495510 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2620948625 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2759123509 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2896702048 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2943010114 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2965390203 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W2997326728 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W3000459935 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W3019350884 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W3087748802 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4200569081 cites W3168235571 @default.
• W4200569081 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.021" @default.
• W4200569081 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34961625" @default.
• W4200569081 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4200569081 type Work @default.
• W4200569081 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4200569081 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4200569081 hasAuthorship W4200569081A5036697602 @default.
• W4200569081 hasAuthorship W4200569081A5049520100 @default.
• W4200569081 hasAuthorship W4200569081A5059114107 @default.
• W4200569081 hasAuthorship W4200569081A5085500443 @default.
• W4200569081 hasAuthorship W4200569081A5086096117 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C197934379 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C2776090536 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C111919701 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C126322002 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C127413603 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C141071460 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C147176958 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C168563851 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C17744445 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C1862650 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C189708586 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C197934379 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C199539241 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C2776090536 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C2777286243 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C2779473830 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C2781184374 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C41008148 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C44249647 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C535046627 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C71924100 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C82789193 @default.
• W4200569081 hasConceptScore W4200569081C95190672 @default.
• W4200569081 hasIssue "2" @default.

• next