FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4205178151> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4205178151 endingPage "1574" @default.
• W4205178151 startingPage "1566" @default.
• W4205178151 abstract "No AccessEngineering NotesImpact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View ConstraintCorrections for this articleCorrection: Impact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View ConstraintSeokwon Lee, Namhoon Cho and Youdan KimSeokwon LeeSeoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea*Postdoctoral Researcher, Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology; . Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this author, Namhoon ChoAgency for Defense Development, Daejeon 34186, Republic of Korea†Senior Researcher, The 1st R&D Institute; . Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this author and Youdan KimSeoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea‡Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology; . Associate Fellow AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:27 Apr 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005063SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Jeon I. S., Lee J. I. and Tahk M. J., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law for Anti-Ship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2006, pp. 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2005.863655 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Jeon I. S., Lee J. I. and Tahk M. J., “Homing Guidance Law for Cooperative Attack of Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2010, pp. 275–280. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40136 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Cho N. and Kim Y., “Modified Pure Proportional Navigation Guidance Law for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2016, pp. 852–872. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001618 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Tahk M. J., Shim S. W., Hong S. M., Choi H. L. and Lee C. H., “Impact Time Control Based on Time-to-Go Prediction for Sea-Skimming Antiship Missiles,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2018, pp. 2043–2052. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2803538 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Kim M., Jung B., Han B., Lee S. and Kim Y., “Lyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Laws Against Stationary Targets,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2015, pp. 1111–1122. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2014.130717 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Cho D., Kim H. J. and Tahk M. J., “Nonsingular Sliding Mode Guidance for Impact Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016, pp. 61–68. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001167 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Cheng Z., Wang B., Liu L. and Wang Y., “A Composite Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law and Simultaneous Arrival,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 80, Sept. 2018, pp. 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Saleem A. and Ratnoo A., “Lyapunov-Based Guidance Law for Impact Time Control and Simultaneous Arrival,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016, pp. 164–173. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001349 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Kim H. G., Cho D. and Kim H. J., “Sliding Mode Guidance Law for Impact Time Control Without Explicit Time-to-Go Estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2019, pp. 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2850208 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Jung B. and Kim Y., “Guidance Laws for Anti-Ship Missiles Using Impact Angle and Impact Time,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2006-6432, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-6432 Google Scholar[11] Lee J. I., Jeon I. S. and Tahk M. J., “Guidance Law to Control Impact Time and Angle,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2007, pp. 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2007.357135 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Harl N. and Balakrishnan S. N., “Impact Time and Angle Guidance with Sliding Mode Control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1436–1449. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2169795 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Kim T.-H., Lee C.-H., Jeon I.-S. and Tahk M.-J., “Augmented Polynomial Guidance with Impact Time and Angle Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2013, pp. 2806–2817. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2013.6621856 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Kumar S. R. and Ghose D., “Impact Time and Angle Control Guidance,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2015-0616, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0616 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Harrison G. A., “Hybrid Guidance Law for Approach Angle and Time-of-Arrival Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.56131 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Hu Q., Han T. and Xin M., “New Impact Time and Angle Guidance Strategy via Virtual Target Approach,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 8, 2018, pp. 1755–1765. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003436 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Zhou J. and Yang J., “Distributed Guidance Law Design for Cooperative Simultaneous Attacks with Multiple Missiles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2439–2447. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001609 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Li Z. and Ding Z., “Robust Cooperative Guidance Law for Simultaneous Arrival,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2018, pp. 1360–1367. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.87 Google Scholar[19] Sang D. K. and Tahk M. J., “Guidance Law Switching Logic Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View Limits,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 223, No. 8, 2009, pp. 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100JAERO614 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[20] Zhang Y., Wang X. and Wu H., “Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Field of View Constraint,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Dec. 2014, pp. 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.10.002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Chen X. and Wang J., “Nonsingular Sliding-Mode Control for Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Guidance,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2018, pp. 1214–1222. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003146 LinkGoogle Scholar[22] Kim H. G. and Kim H. J., “Backstepping-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Law for Missiles with Reduced Seeker Field-of-View,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2019, pp. 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2018.2848319 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Erer K. S. and Tekin R., “Impact Time and Angle Control Based on Constrained Optimal Solutions,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2448–2454. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000414 LinkGoogle Scholar[24] Jeon I. S. and Lee J. I., “Impact-Time-Control Guidance Law with Constraints on Seeker Look Angle,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2017, pp. 2621–2627. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2698837 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[25] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Adaptive Impact Time Control via Look-Angle Shaping Under Varying Velocity,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 12, 2017, pp. 3247–3255. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002981 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Polynomial Shaping of the Look Angle for Impact-Time Control,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 10, 2017, pp. 2668–2673. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002751 LinkGoogle Scholar[27] Tekin R. and Erer K. S., “Impact Time and Angle Control Against Moving Targets with Look Angle Shaping,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1020–1025. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004762 LinkGoogle Scholar[28] Kim H.-G., Lee J.-Y., Kim H. J., Kwon H.-H. and Park J.-S., “Look-Angle-Shaping Guidance Law for Impact Angle and Time Control with Field-of-View Constraint,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2020, pp. 1602–1612. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.2019.2924175 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[29] Tekin R., Erer K. S. and Holzapfel F., “Impact Time Control with Generalized-Polynomial Range Formulation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2018, pp. 1190–1195. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003279 LinkGoogle Scholar[30] Ryoo C.-K., Cho H. and Tahk M.-J., “Time-to-Go Weighted Optimal Guidance with Impact Angle Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2006, pp. 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2006.872525 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[31] Dhananjay N. and Ghose D., “Accurate Time-to-Go Estimation for Proportional Navigation Guidance,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2014, pp. 1378–1383. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000082 LinkGoogle Scholar[32] Wang P., Guo Y., Ma G. and Wie B., “New Differential Geometric Guidance Strategies for Impact-Time Control Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2019, pp. 1982–1992. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004229 LinkGoogle Scholar[33] Tsalik R. and Shima T., “Circular Impact-Time Guidance,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 8, 2019, pp. 1836–1847. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004074 LinkGoogle Scholar[34] Lee S., Ann S., Cho N. and Kim Y., “Capturability of Guidance Laws for Interception of Nonmaneuvering Target with Field-of-View Limit,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2019, pp. 869–884. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003860 LinkGoogle Scholar[35] Lee S. and Kim Y., “Capturability of Impact-Angle Control Composite Guidance Law Considering Field-of-View Limit,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2020, pp. 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2019.2925485 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[36] Tekin R. and Erer K. S., “Switched-Gain Guidance for Impact Angle Control Under Physical Constraints,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2015, pp. 205–216. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000766 LinkGoogle Scholar[37] Ratnoo A., “Analysis of Two-Stage Proportional Navigation with Heading Constraints,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2016, pp. 156–164. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001262 LinkGoogle Scholar[38] Park B. G., Kwon H. H., Kim Y. H. and Kim T. H., “Composite Guidance Scheme for Impact Angle Control Against a Nonmaneuvering Moving Target,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2016, pp. 1132–1139. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001547 LinkGoogle Scholar[39] Park B. G., Kim T. H. and Tahk M. J., “Biased PNG with Terminal-Angle Constraint for Intercepting Nonmaneuvering Targets Under Physical Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2017, pp. 1562–1572. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2017.2667518 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[40] Park B. G., Kim T. H. and Tahk M. J., “Optimal Impact Angle Control Guidance Law Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View Limits,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 227, No. 8, 2013, pp. 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410012452367 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[41] Locke A., Principles of Guided Missile Design—Volume 1: Guidance, D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, NJ, 1955, Chap. 12. Google Scholar[42] Shneydor N. A., Missile Guidance and Pursuit: Kinematics, Dynamics and Control, Woodehead, Cambridge, England, U.K., 1998, Chap. 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLyapunov-Based Impact Time Control Guidance Law with Performance Prediction20 March 2023 | Aerospace, Vol. 10, No. 3Time and FOV constraint guidance applicable to maneuvering target via sliding mode controlAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 133Consensus-Based Finite-Time Cooperative Guidance with Field-of-View Constraint22 June 2022 | International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 5Deep reinforcement learning-based impact time control guidance law with constraints on the field-of-viewAerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 128Unified Method for Field-of-View-Limited Homing GuidanceWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang , Hungsun Son and Ming Xin 17 April 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 8FOV constrained guidance law for nonstationary nonmaneuvering target interception with any impact angle6 October 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 10Composite Guidance for Impact Time Control Under Physical ConstraintsIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 58, No. 2Three-Dimensional Impact Time Control Guidance Considering Field-of-View Constraint and Velocity Variation9 April 2022 | Aerospace, Vol. 9, No. 4New Look-Angle Tracking Guidance Strategy for Impact Time and Angle ControlPengyu Wang, Yanning Guo , Guangfu Ma, Chang-Hun Lee and Bong Wie20 October 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 3Three-dimensional Look Angle Rate Constrained Guidance for Strapdown Imaging Seeker Equipped Missiles17 January 2022 | International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, Vol. 20, No. 1Three-Dimensional Nonsingular Cooperative Guidance Law with Different Field-of-View ConstraintsWei Dong , Chunyan Wang, Jianan Wang and Ming Xin 6 September 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 11Look-Angle-Constrained Control of Arrival Time with Exact Knowledge of Time-to-GoNamhoon Cho and Seokwon Lee 26 May 2021 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 44, No. 10Field-of-View Constrained Impact Time Control Guidance via Time-Varying Sliding Mode Control6 September 2021 | Aerospace, Vol. 8, No. 9Integral barrier Lyapunov functions-based integrated guidance and control design for strap-down missile with field-of-view constraint8 January 2021 | Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, Vol. 43, No. 6Auxiliary-system-based composite adaptive optimal backstepping control for uncertain nonlinear guidance systems with input constraintsISA Transactions, Vol. 107Related articlesCorrection: Impact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View Constraint1 Jul 2020Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics What's Popular Volume 43, Number 8August 2020 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2020 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAvionicsComposite MaterialsComposite StructuresControl TheoryGuidance and Navigational AlgorithmsGuidance, Navigation, and Control SystemsMaterialsMaterials and Structural MechanicsNavigational GuidanceNonlinear Control Theory KeywordsControl GuidanceComposite StructuresBiased Proportional Navigation GuidanceNumerical SimulationNonlinear ControlEngagement KinematicsFlight Path AngleTerminal GuidanceAngle of AttackGuidance AlgorithmsAcknowledgmentsThis work was conducted at the High-Speed Vehicle Research Center of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology with the support of the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and the Agency for Defense Development under contract UD170018CD.PDF Received30 December 2019Accepted31 March 2020Published online27 April 2020" @default.
• W4205178151 created "2022-01-25" @default.
• W4205178151 creator A5006517279 @default.
• W4205178151 creator A5040511921 @default.
• W4205178151 creator A5054673275 @default.
• W4205178151 date "2020-08-01" @default.
• W4205178151 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W4205178151 title "Impact-Time-Control Guidance Strategy with a Composite Structure Considering the Seeker’s Field-of-View Constraint" @default.
• W4205178151 cites W1559149332 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W1969930165 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W1972773929 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W1982076270 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W1989532369 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2009224126 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2014005086 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2043589806 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2053070294 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2053783993 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2057028990 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2062035609 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2143756252 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2143784821 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2154537545 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2156948603 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2225144651 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2294121217 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2331181761 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2419865157 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2461810118 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2502930595 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2586865518 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2609622286 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2610254624 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2743511638 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2781895783 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2782218798 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2788399179 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2791127459 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2793903703 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2803608543 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2809324768 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2888906138 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2906240830 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2944591803 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2947646005 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2949515202 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2954379339 @default.
• W4205178151 cites W2997640548 @default.
• W4205178151 doi "https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g005063" @default.
• W4205178151 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4205178151 type Work @default.
• W4205178151 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W4205178151 countsByYear W42051781512020 @default.
• W4205178151 countsByYear W42051781512021 @default.
• W4205178151 countsByYear W42051781512022 @default.
• W4205178151 countsByYear W42051781512023 @default.
• W4205178151 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4205178151 hasAuthorship W4205178151A5006517279 @default.
• W4205178151 hasAuthorship W4205178151A5040511921 @default.
• W4205178151 hasAuthorship W4205178151A5054673275 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C133731056 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C2776036281 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C47446073 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C104779481 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C11413529 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C127413603 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C133731056 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C146978453 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C154945302 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C202444582 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C2775924081 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C2776036281 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C33923547 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C41008148 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C47446073 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C78519656 @default.
• W4205178151 hasConceptScore W4205178151C9652623 @default.
• W4205178151 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W4205178151 hasLocation W42051781511 @default.
• W4205178151 hasOpenAccess W4205178151 @default.
• W4205178151 hasPrimaryLocation W42051781511 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W1522672041 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W1602072618 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W2371931285 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W2389580564 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W2773086364 @default.
• W4205178151 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.

• next