FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4205617932> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4205617932 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Screening mammography is recommended for the early detection of breast cancer. The processes for ordering screening mammography often rely on a health care provider order and a scheduler to arrange the time and location of breast imaging. Self-scheduling after automated ordering of screening mammograms may offer a more efficient and convenient way to schedule screening mammograms. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> The aim of this study was to determine the use, outcomes, and efficiency of an automated mammogram ordering and invitation process paired with self-scheduling. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We examined appointment data from 12 months of scheduled mammogram appointments, starting in September 2019 when a web and mobile app self-scheduling process for screening mammograms was made available for the Mayo Clinic primary care practice. Patients registered to the Mayo Clinic Patient Online Services could view the schedules and book their mammogram appointment via the web or a mobile app. Self-scheduling required no telephone calls or staff appointment schedulers. We examined uptake (count and percentage of patients utilizing self-scheduling), number of appointment actions taken by self-schedulers and by those using staff schedulers, no-show outcomes, scheduling efficiency, and weekend and after-hours use of self-scheduling. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> For patients who were registered to patient online services and had screening mammogram appointment activity, 15.3% (14,387/93,901) used the web or mobile app to do either some mammogram self-scheduling or self-cancelling appointment actions. Approximately 24.4% (3285/13,454) of self-scheduling occurred after normal business hours/on weekends. Approximately 9.3% (8736/93,901) of the patients used self-scheduling/cancelling exclusively. For self-scheduled mammograms, there were 5.7% (536/9433) no-shows compared to 4.6% (3590/77,531) no-shows in staff-scheduled mammograms (unadjusted odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.13-1.36; <i>P</i><.001). The odds ratio of no-shows for self-scheduled mammograms to staff-scheduled mammograms decreased to 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.23; <i>P</i>=.02) when adjusted for age, race, and ethnicity. On average, since there were only 0.197 staff-scheduler actions for each finalized self-scheduled appointment, staff schedulers were rarely used to redo or “clean up” self-scheduled appointments. Exclusively self-scheduled appointments were significantly more efficient than staff-scheduled appointments. Self-schedulers experienced a single appointment step process (one and done) for 93.5% (7553/8079) of their finalized appointments; only 74.5% (52,804/70,839) of staff-scheduled finalized appointments had a similar one-step appointment process (<i>P</i><.001). For staff-scheduled appointments, 25.5% (18,035/70,839) of the finalized appointments took multiple appointment steps. For finalized appointments that were exclusively self-scheduled, only 6.5% (526/8079) took multiple appointment steps. The staff-scheduled to self-scheduled odds ratio of taking multiple steps for a finalized screening mammogram appointment was 4.9 (95% CI 4.48-5.37; <i>P</i><.001). </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Screening mammograms can be efficiently self-scheduled but may be associated with a slight increase in no-shows. Self-scheduling can decrease staff scheduler work and can be convenient for patients who want to manage their appointment scheduling activity after business hours or on weekends. </sec>" @default.
• W4205617932 created "2022-01-26" @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5021012078 @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5023661659 @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5043980656 @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5051656655 @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5055350756 @default.
• W4205617932 creator A5086022210 @default.
• W4205617932 date "2021-02-08" @default.
• W4205617932 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4205617932 title "The Effect of Automated Mammogram Orders Paired With Electronic Invitations to Self-schedule on Mammogram Scheduling Outcomes: Observational Cohort Comparison (Preprint)" @default.
• W4205617932 cites W1524092019 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W1993068069 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2002158737 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2078395305 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2134302857 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2166751697 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2533335609 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2609052419 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2802684173 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2891603420 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2920435205 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2932296575 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2936876638 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2970559457 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W2974567097 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W3023261034 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W4232237637 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W4245098151 @default.
• W4205617932 cites W4252808708 @default.
• W4205617932 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.27072" @default.
• W4205617932 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4205617932 type Work @default.
• W4205617932 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4205617932 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5021012078 @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5023661659 @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5043980656 @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5051656655 @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5055350756 @default.
• W4205617932 hasAuthorship W4205617932A5086022210 @default.
• W4205617932 hasBestOaLocation W42056179322 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C176553487 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C206729178 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C43169469 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C68387754 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C111919701 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C121608353 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C126322002 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C127413603 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C136764020 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C176553487 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C206729178 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C21547014 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C2780472235 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C41008148 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C43169469 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C530470458 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C68387754 @default.
• W4205617932 hasConceptScore W4205617932C71924100 @default.
• W4205617932 hasLocation W42056179321 @default.
• W4205617932 hasLocation W42056179322 @default.
• W4205617932 hasOpenAccess W4205617932 @default.
• W4205617932 hasPrimaryLocation W42056179321 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W1651072 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W2086429 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W2368843 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W2412897 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W2910718 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W3498247 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W389059 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W5539993 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W6430409 @default.
• W4205617932 hasRelatedWork W781563 @default.
• W4205617932 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4205617932 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4205617932 workType "article" @default.