FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4205621676> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4205621676 endingPage "e60" @default.
• W4205621676 startingPage "e55" @default.
• W4205621676 abstract "<h3>Background</h3> Healthcare is not as safe as it should be and medication error remains a significant source of preventable morbidity and mortality among patients. <h3>Objectives</h3> To present a failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) of the medication management process in the pharmacy of the largest teaching hospital in Tunisia. Secondly, to examine the validity of a proposed simplified risk rating method by comparing the degree of concordance with the FMEA rating system in classifying failure modes related to the studied process. <h3>Methods</h3> The FMEA method was applied to the medication management process in the pharmacy for 5 months from January 2020. For the traditional FMEA rating system, failure modes were prioritised according to the risk priority number, which considers severity, occurrence and non-detectability. Failure modes were classified for the traditional method considering three categories: accepted, requiring control and critical. The proposed rating system was based on two indices: the number of parts, which reflected severity, and the number of causes according to the 5M method (manpower, machines, material, methods and medium), which reflected occurrence. Failure modes were classified for the proposed method considering three categories: low, medium and high. Failure modes were independently analysed to determine the degree of agreement in ranking of risk between the two studied methods. Prioritised failure modes were targeted by decisions and solutions aiming to reduce risk and enhance safety. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-four failure modes were identified for the six-step process of medication management in a pharmacy (overall criticality=2607). The most critical failure modes were: data error in drugs reception (risk priority number (RPN)=432), break in the cold chain (RPN=320) and non-optimal pharmaceutical analysis (RPN=280). A good agreement was found between the classic FMEA and the proposed rating methods (κ=0.795). A high correlation was shown between the two scorings (r=0.785). Three failure modes were underestimated by the proposed rating method. <h3>Conclusions</h3> An FMEA study on the medication management process in a teaching pharmacy showed that FMEA is an effective, proactive risk assessment that enables a better understanding of the studied process. The proposed risk scoring permits a good concordance with the classic method, with the advantage of being fast. Targeting the identified risks will allow integration into a continuous process of improvement and increase patient safety." @default.
• W4205621676 created "2022-01-26" @default.
• W4205621676 creator A5043647888 @default.
• W4205621676 creator A5054303628 @default.
• W4205621676 creator A5079459257 @default.
• W4205621676 date "2022-01-21" @default.
• W4205621676 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W4205621676 title "Failure mode and effect analysis applied to improve the medication management process in a pharmacy of a teaching hospital and a proposal for a simplified rating system" @default.
• W4205621676 cites W1165602552 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W121489264 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W1978173187 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2014397507 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2019376819 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2039784264 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2043290300 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2108476697 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2109187129 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2130882329 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2142302081 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2164055213 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2512798772 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2553678824 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2592761540 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2601568109 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2604240647 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2753189579 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2760337520 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2803587722 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2922220313 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2980935704 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W2995724467 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W3014237384 @default.
• W4205621676 cites W3094637293 @default.
• W4205621676 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2021-003013" @default.
• W4205621676 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35064019" @default.
• W4205621676 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4205621676 type Work @default.
• W4205621676 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4205621676 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4205621676 hasAuthorship W4205621676A5043647888 @default.
• W4205621676 hasAuthorship W4205621676A5054303628 @default.
• W4205621676 hasAuthorship W4205621676A5079459257 @default.
• W4205621676 hasBestOaLocation W42056216761 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C104863432 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C189430467 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C30098461 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C66283442 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C104863432 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C111919701 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C126322002 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C127413603 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C154945302 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C159110408 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C160798450 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C189430467 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C200601418 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C30098461 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C41008148 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C545542383 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C66283442 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C71924100 @default.
• W4205621676 hasConceptScore W4205621676C98045186 @default.
• W4205621676 hasIssue "e1" @default.
• W4205621676 hasLocation W42056216761 @default.
• W4205621676 hasLocation W42056216762 @default.
• W4205621676 hasOpenAccess W4205621676 @default.
• W4205621676 hasPrimaryLocation W42056216761 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W205701612 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2086067481 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2373947558 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2381371756 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2529082422 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2782257358 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2888962621 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W2965236792 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W3138570190 @default.
• W4205621676 hasRelatedWork W4320058925 @default.
• W4205621676 hasVolume "30" @default.
• W4205621676 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4205621676 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4205621676 workType "article" @default.