Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4206988256> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W4206988256 endingPage "98" @default.
- W4206988256 startingPage "86" @default.
- W4206988256 abstract "There are currently many different anthropometric methods to determine individual body fat percentage, as well as almost as many variants of bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and only a single method of infrared reflection measurement (IR) as easily feasible methods of field research. The present study aims at a simultaneous comparison between calipermetry, IR and BIA. In particular, the question which measurement method could be used as an equivalent method in the event of failure of the BIA or IR is investigated. The sample group consisted of 250 male office workers from the Rhine-Main area (average age 31.75 ± 9.16 years, average height 178.5 ± 6.93 cm and average weight 80.61 ± 9.42 kg). The measurements were previously scheduled and mostly carried out during the lunch break. For anthropometry, 13 skin fat folds were measured with the help of the Accu® Measure Caliper, thigh circumference with the help of a measuring tape, height with a height measuring device and body mass on the weight scale. Subsequently, an IR measurement (Futrex®) and a BIA (InBody®) were performed on the same subject. The parameters of body fat percentage and total body water (in litres) were examined. The statistical methods were correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman comparison and paired t-test for equivalence. For the men studied, the highest correlation coefficients were in the comparisons between the formulas according to Parízkova & Buzkova 1 and Parízkova & Buzkova 3 (r = 0.93), as well as for Parízkova & Buzkova 3 and Parízkova & Buzkova 4 (r = 0.96). The correlation coefficient for the IR vs. BIA comparison was only r = 0.56. A key result of the present study was the finding that certain methods cannot be substituted in an equivalent way, in fact only some calipermetric regression equations." @default.
- W4206988256 created "2022-01-26" @default.
- W4206988256 creator A5069312358 @default.
- W4206988256 creator A5071777619 @default.
- W4206988256 creator A5083399300 @default.
- W4206988256 date "2021-12-31" @default.
- W4206988256 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
- W4206988256 title "Body composition of male office workers compared by means of infrared reflection measurement, bioimpedance analysis and calipermetry" @default.
- W4206988256 doi "https://doi.org/10.12697/poa.2021.30.2.07" @default.
- W4206988256 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W4206988256 type Work @default.
- W4206988256 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W4206988256 countsByYear W42069882562022 @default.
- W4206988256 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4206988256 hasAuthorship W4206988256A5069312358 @default.
- W4206988256 hasAuthorship W4206988256A5071777619 @default.
- W4206988256 hasAuthorship W4206988256A5083399300 @default.
- W4206988256 hasBestOaLocation W42069882561 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C139319395 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C147583825 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C186738849 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C2776193436 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C3018577593 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C55078378 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C61427482 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C105795698 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C126322002 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C139319395 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C140793950 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C147583825 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C186738849 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C2524010 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C2776193436 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C2780221984 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C2989005 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C3018577593 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C33923547 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C55078378 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C61427482 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C71924100 @default.
- W4206988256 hasConceptScore W4206988256C86803240 @default.
- W4206988256 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4206988256 hasLocation W42069882561 @default.
- W4206988256 hasOpenAccess W4206988256 @default.
- W4206988256 hasPrimaryLocation W42069882561 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W1488046095 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W1973864387 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W2077488666 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W2178664034 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W2326898904 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W2506380448 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W2953288624 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W4206988256 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W4366180459 @default.
- W4206988256 hasRelatedWork W182229656 @default.
- W4206988256 hasVolume "30" @default.
- W4206988256 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4206988256 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4206988256 workType "article" @default.