FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210349710> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210349710 endingPage "919" @default.
• W4210349710 startingPage "913" @default.
• W4210349710 abstract "Couple relationship problems are common and associated with health problems. The aim of this study was to explore general practitioners' (GPs') experiences, expectations, and educational needs when dealing with couple relationship problems in consultations.We conducted an exploratory qualitative study by carrying out 3 semistructured focus group interviews with 18 GPs. We used systematic text condensation for the analyses.Participants shared their experiences of handling couple relationship problems in consultations. Three main themes emerged: (i) pragmatic case-finding: golden opportunities to reveal patients' couple relationship problems; (ii) conceptual and role confusion; (iii) professional competence and personal experience. While issues in relationships could serve as an explanation for relevant clinical problems, some GPs questioned whether relationship issues are strictly medical. All participants had engaged in individual supportive therapy, but none saw themselves as therapists. The interviews revealed that an individual supportive focus might lead to a consolidation of 1 partner's view, rather than challenging their position. Long-term doctor-patient relationships made it easier to talk about these issues.This study revealed several paradoxes. GPs are confident in offering individual supportive therapy for couple relationship issues but should be aware of substantial pitfalls such as side-taking and constraining change. Despite dealing with relationship problems, GPs do not see themselves as therapists. They use professional and personal experience but would benefit from increasing their skills in cognitive restructuring promoting behavioural flexibility facing relationship problems.Couple relationship problems are common and often raised in general practitioner (GP) consultations as they are associated with health problems. We lack knowledge about what experiences, expectations, and educational needs GPs have when dealing with these problems. In 2020, we interviewed 18 GPs about how they handle couple relationship problems in their practice. Three main themes emerged: (i) Patients seldom present their relationship as the main problem. GPs conduct pragmatic case-finding to reveal relational problems that might be connected to, or be a risk factor for, health problems. (ii) GPs deal with couple relationship problems in several ways. Some think that they are not a medical problem, while others take a more holistic approach. In both cases, GPs lack the tools to assess couple relationship problems and to offer brief interventions. (iii) The most experienced doctors emphasized that their professional and personal experience qualified them to support their patients. Continuity in the doctor–patient relationship was also considered important. We revealed that taking a biopsychosocial approach can be challenged by searching for biomedical causes for problems. GPs should be aware of the pitfalls of individual supportive therapy in dealing with couple relationship issues, such as taking sides and impeding change." @default.
• W4210349710 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210349710 creator A5022053297 @default.
• W4210349710 creator A5029439567 @default.
• W4210349710 creator A5039629893 @default.
• W4210349710 creator A5065117878 @default.
• W4210349710 date "2022-02-18" @default.
• W4210349710 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4210349710 title "How do general practitioners handle couple relationship problems in consultations? A focus group study" @default.
• W4210349710 cites W1972025415 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W1981459575 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2004836005 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2013335946 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2039890767 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2045831130 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2049576479 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2078904464 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2098187936 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2103666798 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2116839388 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2133177782 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2135689211 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2137342480 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2151186028 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2151801760 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2161906294 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2171935595 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2186778280 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2305278139 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2316023606 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2344120807 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2401052984 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2441508661 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2588254203 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2594541941 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2623639384 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2780097989 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2887623535 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W2900721344 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W3089014377 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W4226068378 @default.
• W4210349710 cites W4230923111 @default.
• W4210349710 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac010" @default.
• W4210349710 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35179196" @default.
• W4210349710 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4210349710 type Work @default.
• W4210349710 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210349710 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4210349710 hasAuthorship W4210349710A5022053297 @default.
• W4210349710 hasAuthorship W4210349710A5029439567 @default.
• W4210349710 hasAuthorship W4210349710A5039629893 @default.
• W4210349710 hasAuthorship W4210349710A5065117878 @default.
• W4210349710 hasBestOaLocation W42103497101 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C2775961244 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConcept C85973986 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C100521375 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C144024400 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C144133560 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C15744967 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C159110408 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C162853370 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C190248442 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C19165224 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C2775961244 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C36289849 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C512399662 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C56995899 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C71924100 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C77805123 @default.
• W4210349710 hasConceptScore W4210349710C85973986 @default.
• W4210349710 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W4210349710 hasLocation W42103497101 @default.
• W4210349710 hasLocation W42103497102 @default.
• W4210349710 hasLocation W42103497103 @default.
• W4210349710 hasLocation W42103497104 @default.
• W4210349710 hasOpenAccess W4210349710 @default.
• W4210349710 hasPrimaryLocation W42103497101 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W1526806049 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W1557394218 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W2149191991 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W2305829027 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W3007078198 @default.
• W4210349710 hasRelatedWork W3203719427 @default.

• next