FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210373439> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210373439 endingPage "728" @default.
• W4210373439 startingPage "718" @default.
• W4210373439 abstract "An actual look at the Russian artistic process of the 19th century is largely determined by the experience of Soviet art history, which, in turn, appealed to the authority of the critic Vladimir Stasov (1824–1906). One of the plots that allow us to assess the tendentiousness of his interpretations is related to the question of the Russian Style in the architecture of post-reform Russia. Now the subjectivist and contradictory nature of Stasov’s judgments about national and democratic art is reflected by researchers. However, as the author of this article shows, the reading of Stasov’s texts by Soviet architectural historians was also biased. This can be clearly seen in the example of the idea developed by Evgenia I. Kirichenko about what the confrontation between two different versions of the Russian Style, reflecting the political opposition of the official nationality and the diverse intelligentsia allegedly took place in architecture in the 1870s and 1890s. Indeed, one can find an opposition between two alternatively versions of nationalized architecture that runs through Stasov’s texts. But a closer reading of them, it becomes clear that the critic distinguishes not synchronously developing official and democratic versions of the Russian Style, but two artistic eras — associated with the reigns of Nicholas I and Alexander II, respectively. Stasov’s apologia for the Russian Style of Victor Hartman and Ivan Ropette, as opposed to the state-official architecture of Konstantin Thon, had a socio-political tone, but there was no connection between the ropetovshchina and the radical intelligentsia’s views. On the contrary, the pathos of his speeches consisted in great sympathy for the cause of the reforms of Alexander II, a quarter-century of whose reign was described by Stasov as a period of unprecedented liberation of Russian creative spirit. The making difference of the Russian Style according to the “party affiliation” of architects and artists is counterproductive, since this affiliation itself is very doubtful. Periodization, in the opinion of the author of the article, is a much more adequate method of systematizing the materials of the Russian Style." @default.
• W4210373439 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210373439 creator A5065528608 @default.
• W4210373439 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W4210373439 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4210373439 title "Two Russian Styles, Vladimir Stasov and One the Myth in a History of 19th-century Russian Art" @default.
• W4210373439 doi "https://doi.org/10.18688/aa2111-07-58" @default.
• W4210373439 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4210373439 type Work @default.
• W4210373439 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210373439 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4210373439 hasAuthorship W4210373439A5065528608 @default.
• W4210373439 hasBestOaLocation W42103734391 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C123657996 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C2776129495 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C2992724251 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C519517224 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C6303427 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C123657996 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C124952713 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C142362112 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C153349607 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C17744445 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C199539241 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C2776129495 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C2776445246 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C2780668109 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C2992724251 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C519517224 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C52119013 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C555826173 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C6303427 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C94625758 @default.
• W4210373439 hasConceptScore W4210373439C95457728 @default.
• W4210373439 hasLocation W42103734391 @default.
• W4210373439 hasOpenAccess W4210373439 @default.
• W4210373439 hasPrimaryLocation W42103734391 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W1727308157 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2063595925 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2294695029 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2315573140 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2352051500 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2783197029 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2888695234 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4210373439 hasRelatedWork W66124012 @default.
• W4210373439 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W4210373439 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4210373439 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4210373439 workType "article" @default.