FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210510315> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210510315 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Even in the era of digital technology, several hospitals still rely on paper-based forms for data entry for patient admission, triage, drug prescriptions, and procedures. Paper-based forms can be quick and convenient to complete but often at the expense of data quality, completeness, sustainability, and automated data analytics. Digital forms can improve data quality by assisting the user when deciding on the appropriate response to certain data inputs (eg, classifying symptoms). Greater data quality via digital form completion not only helps with auditing, service improvement, and patient record keeping but also helps with novel data science and machine learning research. Although digital forms are becoming more prevalent in health care, there is a lack of empirical best practices and guidelines for their design. The study-based hospital had a definite plan to abolish the paper form; hence, it was not necessary to compare the digital forms with the paper form. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to assess the usability of three different interactive forms: a single-page digital form (in which all data input is required on one web page), a multipage digital form, and a conversational digital form (a chatbot). </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The three digital forms were developed as candidates to replace the current paper-based form used to record patient referrals to an interventional cardiology department (Cath-Lab) at Altnagelvin Hospital. We recorded usability data in a counterbalanced usability test (60 usability tests: 20 subjects×3 form usability tests). The usability data included task completion times, System Usability Scale (SUS) scores, User Experience Questionnaire data, and data from a postexperiment questionnaire. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> We found that the single-page form outperformed the other two digital forms in almost all usability metrics. The mean SUS score for the single-page form was 76 (SD 15.8; <i>P</i>=.01) when compared with the multipage form, which had a mean score of 67 (SD 17), and the conversational form attained the lowest scores in usability testing and was the least preferred choice of users, with a mean score of 57 (SD 24). An SUS score of &gt;68 was considered above average. The single-page form achieved the least task completion time compared with the other two digital form styles. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> In conclusion, the digital single-page form outperformed the other two forms in almost all usability metrics; it had the least task completion time compared with those of the other two digital forms. Moreover, on answering the open-ended question from the final customized postexperiment questionnaire, the single-page form was the preferred choice. </sec>" @default.
• W4210510315 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5010537224 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5045425207 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5047332043 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5047624828 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5055308927 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5066251995 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5066922218 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5067279312 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5072110026 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5073551828 @default.
• W4210510315 creator A5077771643 @default.
• W4210510315 date "2020-11-23" @default.
• W4210510315 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4210510315 title "Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study (Preprint)" @default.
• W4210510315 cites W133823049 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W1984253812 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2013687432 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2016157817 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2028597893 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2032191478 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2099117796 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2124955469 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2175992854 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2419901992 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2565206647 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2568709432 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2603809867 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2611556044 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2623779865 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2914439319 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2940530202 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2941148620 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W2942503828 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W4245621892 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W4247011085 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W4255450698 @default.
• W4210510315 cites W95067517 @default.
• W4210510315 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.25787" @default.
• W4210510315 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4210510315 type Work @default.
• W4210510315 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210510315 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5010537224 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5045425207 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5047332043 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5047624828 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5055308927 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5066251995 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5066922218 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5067279312 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5072110026 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5073551828 @default.
• W4210510315 hasAuthorship W4210510315A5077771643 @default.
• W4210510315 hasBestOaLocation W42105103152 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C107457646 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C170130773 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C177212765 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C194541083 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C2780433410 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C4237393 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C107457646 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C136764020 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C160735492 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C162324750 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C170130773 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C177212765 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C187736073 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C194541083 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C199360897 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C199521495 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C2780433410 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C41008148 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C4237393 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C50522688 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C56666940 @default.
• W4210510315 hasConceptScore W4210510315C77088390 @default.
• W4210510315 hasLocation W42105103151 @default.
• W4210510315 hasLocation W42105103152 @default.
• W4210510315 hasOpenAccess W4210510315 @default.
• W4210510315 hasPrimaryLocation W42105103151 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W11343994 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W11588791 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W142996 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W2503058 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W2751474 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W2798310 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W3205524 @default.
• W4210510315 hasRelatedWork W5472601 @default.

• next