FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210562103> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210562103 endingPage "1271" @default.
• W4210562103 startingPage "1261" @default.
• W4210562103 abstract "BackgroundClinical failure associated with nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears may be due to inadequate characterization of the individual's functional impairments. Clinically, restricted passive range of motion (ROM) (restrictions imply capsular tightness), limitations in muscle strength, and larger rotator cuff tears are hypothesized to be related to altered glenohumeral kinematics. Understanding these relationships, as well as the relationship between glenohumeral kinematics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) prior to exercise therapy, may help characterize functional impairments in individuals with rotator cuff tears. The objectives of the study were to describe the baseline presentation of individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tear, including passive ROM, rotator cuff muscle strength, tear size, PROs, and glenohumeral kinematics, and to determine associations among these variables.MethodsOne hundred one individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were recruited for the study and underwent assessments of passive glenohumeral ROM, isometric muscle strength, and ultrasonography to assess anterior-posterior tear size. Glenohumeral kinematics during scapular-plane abduction were measured using biplane radiography. Furthermore, PROs including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score were collected.ResultsIndividuals presented with decreased ROM, external rotation weakness compared with the uninvolved side, and pain and disability as measured by the ASES and WORC scores. These findings were not associated with glenohumeral kinematics, with the exception of a weak positive association between glenohumeral contact path lengths and WORC scores (ρ = 0.25, P = .03). Tear size was 11.7 ± 5.7 mm, and maximum anterior translation, superior translation, and contact path length were 3.0% ± 3.8% of glenoid width, 3.5% ± 3.8% of glenoid height, and 38.2% ± 20.7% of glenoid size, respectively.ConclusionIndividuals with a symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tear presented with decreased ROM, external rotation weakness, and pain and disability as measured by the ASES and WORC scores. However, no abnormal kinematics associated with these limitations were observed. Thus, given that the tear is isolated to the supraspinatus tendon and no capsular restrictions are present, normal function of the glenohumeral joint may be possible during scapular-plane abduction. Clinical failure associated with nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears may be due to inadequate characterization of the individual's functional impairments. Clinically, restricted passive range of motion (ROM) (restrictions imply capsular tightness), limitations in muscle strength, and larger rotator cuff tears are hypothesized to be related to altered glenohumeral kinematics. Understanding these relationships, as well as the relationship between glenohumeral kinematics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) prior to exercise therapy, may help characterize functional impairments in individuals with rotator cuff tears. The objectives of the study were to describe the baseline presentation of individuals with an isolated supraspinatus tear, including passive ROM, rotator cuff muscle strength, tear size, PROs, and glenohumeral kinematics, and to determine associations among these variables. One hundred one individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears were recruited for the study and underwent assessments of passive glenohumeral ROM, isometric muscle strength, and ultrasonography to assess anterior-posterior tear size. Glenohumeral kinematics during scapular-plane abduction were measured using biplane radiography. Furthermore, PROs including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score were collected. Individuals presented with decreased ROM, external rotation weakness compared with the uninvolved side, and pain and disability as measured by the ASES and WORC scores. These findings were not associated with glenohumeral kinematics, with the exception of a weak positive association between glenohumeral contact path lengths and WORC scores (ρ = 0.25, P = .03). Tear size was 11.7 ± 5.7 mm, and maximum anterior translation, superior translation, and contact path length were 3.0% ± 3.8% of glenoid width, 3.5% ± 3.8% of glenoid height, and 38.2% ± 20.7% of glenoid size, respectively. Individuals with a symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tear presented with decreased ROM, external rotation weakness, and pain and disability as measured by the ASES and WORC scores. However, no abnormal kinematics associated with these limitations were observed. Thus, given that the tear is isolated to the supraspinatus tendon and no capsular restrictions are present, normal function of the glenohumeral joint may be possible during scapular-plane abduction." @default.
• W4210562103 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5028113084 @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5035586587 @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5054255291 @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5060968821 @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5075821351 @default.
• W4210562103 creator A5080310557 @default.
• W4210562103 date "2022-06-01" @default.
• W4210562103 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4210562103 title "Associations between range of motion, strength, tear size, patient-reported outcomes, and glenohumeral kinematics in individuals with symptomatic isolated supraspinatus tears" @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1965825146 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1971991520 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1981228003 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1983565245 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1987135058 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W1988653356 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2005019517 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2016890872 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2021802543 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2024251533 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2040116906 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2042082093 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2042952733 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2047555010 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2055192193 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2058554440 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2064130592 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2073984195 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2078782302 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2079215929 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2085327747 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2089732474 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2090091455 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2098252951 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2098654980 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2105265420 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2105391489 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2108341823 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2109434920 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2109444207 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2115553482 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2116774996 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2117447043 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2117584178 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2117639265 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2124672453 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2124745729 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2133495087 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2137623698 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2143951763 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2155267688 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2164791187 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2172463909 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2172896045 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2173705868 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2228849844 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2412503629 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2525006082 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2580207950 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2752423070 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2788207773 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2802748158 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2886412409 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2887705572 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2979393725 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2983662888 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W2988100282 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W3109040687 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W3163128348 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W4230609383 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W4297628246 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W4297832236 @default.
• W4210562103 cites W4297832561 @default.
• W4210562103 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.032" @default.
• W4210562103 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35091074" @default.
• W4210562103 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4210562103 type Work @default.
• W4210562103 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4210562103 countsByYear W42105621032023 @default.
• W4210562103 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5028113084 @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5035586587 @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5054255291 @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5060968821 @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5075821351 @default.
• W4210562103 hasAuthorship W4210562103A5080310557 @default.
• W4210562103 hasBestOaLocation W42105621031 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C2775885956 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C2776511800 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W4210562103 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.

• next