FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210655197> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210655197 abstract "<strong class=journal-contentHeaderColor>Abstract.</strong> Top-down greenhouse gas measurements can be used to independently assess the accuracy of bottom-up emission estimates. We report atmospheric methane (CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span>) mole fractions and <span class=inline-formula><i>δ</i>¹³</span>CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> measurements from Imperial College London from early 2018 onwards using a Picarro G2201-i analyser. Measurements from March 2018 to October 2020 were compared to simulations of CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> mole fractions and <span class=inline-formula><i>δ</i>¹³</span>CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> produced using the NAME (Numerical Atmospheric-dispersion Modelling Environment) dispersion model coupled with the UK National Atmospheric Emissions Inventory, UK NAEI, and a global inventory, the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), with model spatial resolutions of <span class=inline-formula>∼</span> 2, <span class=inline-formula>∼</span> 10, and <span class=inline-formula>∼</span> 25 km. Simulation–measurement comparisons are used to evaluate London emissions and the source apportionment in the global (EDGAR) and UK national (NAEI) emission inventories. Observed mole fractions were underestimated by 30 %–35 % in the NAEI simulations. In contrast, a good correspondence between observations and EDGAR simulations was seen. There was no correlation between the measured and simulated <span class=inline-formula><i>δ</i>¹³</span>CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> values for either NAEI or EDGAR, however, suggesting the inventories' sectoral attributions are incorrect. On average, natural gas sources accounted for 20 %–28 % of the above background CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> in the NAEI simulations and only 6 %–9 % in the EDGAR simulations. In contrast, nearly 84 % of isotopic source values calculated by Keeling plot analysis (using measurement data from the afternoon) of individual pollution events were higher than <span class=inline-formula>−</span>45 ‰, suggesting the primary CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> sources in London are actually natural gas leaks. The simulation–observation comparison of CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> mole fractions suggests that total emissions in London are much higher than the NAEI estimate (0.04 Tg CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> yr<span class=inline-formula>^−1</span>) but close to, or slightly lower than, the EDGAR estimate (0.10 Tg CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> yr<span class=inline-formula>^−1</span>). However, the simulation–observation comparison of <span class=inline-formula><i>δ</i>¹³</span>CH<span class=inline-formula>₄</span> and the Keeling plot results indicate that emissions due to natural gas leaks in London are being underestimated in both the UK NAEI and EDGAR." @default.
• W4210655197 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210655197 creator A5024612116 @default.
• W4210655197 date "2022-01-26" @default.
• W4210655197 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4210655197 title "Comment on acp-2021-606" @default.
• W4210655197 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-606-ac1" @default.
• W4210655197 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4210655197 type Work @default.
• W4210655197 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210655197 crossrefType "peer-review" @default.
• W4210655197 hasAuthorship W4210655197A5024612116 @default.
• W4210655197 hasBestOaLocation W42106551971 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C177562468 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C189764856 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C2778753569 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C559116025 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C120665830 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C121332964 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C127413603 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C153294291 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C177562468 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C178790620 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C185592680 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C189764856 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C2778753569 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C33923547 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C559116025 @default.
• W4210655197 hasConceptScore W4210655197C66938386 @default.
• W4210655197 hasLocation W42106551971 @default.
• W4210655197 hasOpenAccess W4210655197 @default.
• W4210655197 hasPrimaryLocation W42106551971 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W1528181475 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W2586842934 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W2766957232 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W2924916312 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W3037073316 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W3045643988 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W3126191409 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W3160623426 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W3193898197 @default.
• W4210655197 hasRelatedWork W576429550 @default.
• W4210655197 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4210655197 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4210655197 workType "peer-review" @default.