FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210709158> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210709158 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Despite the increasing availability of mobile health services, clinical engagement remains minimal. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to identify and weight barriers to and drivers of health app use among health care professionals (HCPs) from the United Kingdom. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> A discrete choice experiment was conducted with 222 HCPs using a web-based survey between March 2019 and June 2019. Participants were recruited to take part via social media and asked to choose their preferred option of 2 hypothetical health apps to prescribe to a hypothetical patient or to prescribe neither. Choices were characterized by differing levels of patient age, cost, published evidence bases, whether they had a National Health Service (NHS) stamp of approval, personal familiarity with the technology, and whether they were recommended by a fellow HCP. The results were analyzed using a mixed logit model, with subgroup analyses to account for heterogeneity. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> We received 230 responses, a total of 96.5% (n=222/230) of respondents understood the survey task and passed the test of rationality. The median age was between 36 and 45 years, and 62.6% (n=139/222) of the health care providers responding to the survey had previously recommended the use of health apps to patients. Health apps were most likely to be prescribed to patients if they had an NHS stamp of approval or if they were recommended by another HCP (both <i>P</i>&lt;.001). Published studies detailing clinical effectiveness were important (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), but it would take five published studies to have the same impact on prescribing behavior as an NHS stamp of approval and two studies to be as convincing as having used the technology personally. Increasing patient age and costs resulted in significant reductions in digital health prescribing (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), none more so than among allied health professionals. Willingness-to-pay for health apps increased by £124.61 (US $151.14) if an NHS stamp of approval was present and by £29.20 (US $35.42) for each published study. Overall, 8.1% (n=18/222) of respondents were reluctant to use health apps, always choosing the I would prescribe neither option, particularly among older HCPs, nurses, and those who do not use health apps personally. Subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in preferences among HCPs of differing ages and clinical backgrounds. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> An NHS stamp of approval, published studies, and recommendations from fellow HCPs are significant facilitators of digital prescribing, whereas increasing costs and patient age are significant barriers to engagement. These findings suggest that demonstrating assurances of health apps and supporting both the dissemination and peer-to-peer recommendation of evidence-based technologies are critical if the NHS is to achieve its long-term digital transformation ambitions. </sec>" @default.
• W4210709158 created "2022-02-08" @default.
• W4210709158 creator A5029863061 @default.
• W4210709158 creator A5082004007 @default.
• W4210709158 creator A5084706058 @default.
• W4210709158 date "2020-01-06" @default.
• W4210709158 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4210709158 title "Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Mobile Health Among Health Care Professionals From the United Kingdom: Discrete Choice Experiment (Preprint)" @default.
• W4210709158 cites W1868320248 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W1932473789 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W1964758909 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W1965851575 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2056134801 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2290152652 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2339334157 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2367707061 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2753645748 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2775940581 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2780008615 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2782673252 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2893022437 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2898910479 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2943075769 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2947198725 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2950669862 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2963258511 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W2975156427 @default.
• W4210709158 cites W4232212311 @default.
• W4210709158 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.17704" @default.
• W4210709158 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W4210709158 type Work @default.
• W4210709158 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210709158 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4210709158 hasAuthorship W4210709158A5029863061 @default.
• W4210709158 hasAuthorship W4210709158A5082004007 @default.
• W4210709158 hasAuthorship W4210709158A5084706058 @default.
• W4210709158 hasBestOaLocation W42107091582 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConcept C95057490 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C126322002 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C151730666 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C151956035 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C15744967 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C159110408 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C160735492 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C17744445 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C199539241 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C2777267654 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C512399662 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C71924100 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C86803240 @default.
• W4210709158 hasConceptScore W4210709158C95057490 @default.
• W4210709158 hasLocation W42107091581 @default.
• W4210709158 hasLocation W42107091582 @default.
• W4210709158 hasOpenAccess W4210709158 @default.
• W4210709158 hasPrimaryLocation W42107091581 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W11236256 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W1574407 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W1803831 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W19726778 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W21604645 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W4495579 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W7831946 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W8586780 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W8623916 @default.
• W4210709158 hasRelatedWork W9059098 @default.
• W4210709158 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4210709158 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4210709158 workType "article" @default.