FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4210945251> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4210945251 endingPage "113730" @default.
• W4210945251 startingPage "113730" @default.
• W4210945251 abstract "In rodents, repeated single-bottle exposures to distinctly flavored isocaloric glucose and fructose solutions, two sugars with different metabolic pathways, eventually lead to a preference for the former. Because Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery decreases preference for and intake of sugar solutions in rats, we tested whether RYGB would curtail the conditioning of a preference for a glucose-paired vs. fructose-paired flavor. RYGB (♂ n=11; ♀ n=10) and sham-operated (SHAM; ♂ n=9; ♀ n=10) rats were trained with a single bottle (30 min/day) containing 8% glucose solution flavored with either 0.05% grape or cherry Kool-Aid (Glu/CSG) or 8% fructose solution with the alternative Kool-Aid flavor (Fru/CSF) in an alternating fashion for 8 days. To determine baseline preferences, a 4-day 30-min two-bottle test was used to assess preference for Glu/CSG vs. Fru/CSF before training. After training, 2-day 30-min two-bottle tests assessed preference for the a) Glu/CSG (CSG-flavored 8% glucose solution) vs Fru/CSF (CSF-flavored 8% fructose solution), b) CSG- vs. CSF-flavored mixture of 4% glucose & 4% fructose (isocaloric), c) CSG- vs. CSF-flavored 0.2% saccharin (sweet, no calories), and d) CSG- vs. CSF-flavored water. During training, only male SHAM rats demonstrated progressively increased intake of Glu/CSG over Fru/CSF, and female SHAM rats displayed a trend. RYGB eliminated any difference in single-bottle intake of these solutions during training, regardless of sex. Like their male and female SHAM counterparts, male RYGB rats displayed a conditioned preference for the CSG-associated stimulus in Tests 1-3. Although female RYGB rats displayed acquisition of the conditioned flavor preference in Test 1, unlike the other groups, when the differential sugar cue between the two solutions was removed in Tests 2 and 3, female rats did not display a CSG preference. When the sugar and sweetener cues were both removed on Test 4, all groups displayed some generalization decrement. Thus, RYGB does not compromise the ability of rats to learn and express a glucose- vs. fructose-associated conditioned flavor preference when the exact CS used in training is presented in testing. The mechanistic basis for the sex difference in the effect of RYGB on the generalization decrement observed in this type of flavor preference learning warrants further study." @default.
• W4210945251 created "2022-02-09" @default.
• W4210945251 creator A5017221055 @default.
• W4210945251 creator A5021082079 @default.
• W4210945251 creator A5025168443 @default.
• W4210945251 creator A5029009008 @default.
• W4210945251 creator A5091542363 @default.
• W4210945251 date "2022-05-01" @default.
• W4210945251 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4210945251 title "The Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Glucose- vs. Fructose-Associated Conditioned Flavor Preference" @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1929424419 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1965072868 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1965131201 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1968561006 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1968912659 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1972978640 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1978036748 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1980207433 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1986928825 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1991424618 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1992396265 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W1997980079 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2001634366 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2006026432 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2007813461 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2008501546 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2012820882 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2019540191 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2027452110 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2027954881 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2030881781 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2038656944 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2040116169 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2040476968 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2043774278 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2055598669 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2061320650 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2066725447 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2069399924 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2072820746 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2073180548 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2076303596 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2077696851 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2084793748 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2086478060 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2090197076 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2091899383 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2095184586 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2117476811 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2127982025 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2144631980 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2147872784 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2155431359 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2159215817 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2165197542 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2180032875 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2209973805 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2226587516 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2261424010 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2295388074 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2337994279 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2498178122 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2500615410 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2562627518 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2606084964 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2620867156 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2734505122 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2742678630 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2768606080 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2787707131 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2913362921 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2950522579 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2970170860 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2976801442 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W2997878306 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W3009003273 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W3012473952 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W39277245 @default.
• W4210945251 cites W66554831 @default.
• W4210945251 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2022.113730" @default.
• W4210945251 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35149056" @default.
• W4210945251 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4210945251 type Work @default.
• W4210945251 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4210945251 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4210945251 hasAuthorship W4210945251A5017221055 @default.
• W4210945251 hasAuthorship W4210945251A5021082079 @default.
• W4210945251 hasAuthorship W4210945251A5025168443 @default.
• W4210945251 hasAuthorship W4210945251A5029009008 @default.
• W4210945251 hasAuthorship W4210945251A5091542363 @default.
• W4210945251 hasBestOaLocation W42109452511 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C2776970464 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C2777108408 @default.
• W4210945251 hasConcept C2779147919 @default.

• next