FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4211232462> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4211232462 endingPage "208" @default.
• W4211232462 startingPage "203" @default.
• W4211232462 abstract "Free Access References C. Neal Stewart Jr., C. Neal Stewart Jr. University of Tennessee, USASearch for more papers by this author Book Author(s):C. Neal Stewart Jr., C. Neal Stewart Jr. University of Tennessee, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 September 2011 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119978862.refs AboutPDFPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShareShare a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat References Akst, J. 2010. I hate your paper. The Scientist 24(8): 36– 41. Allen, J. 2008. Can of worms. Retrieved 2009, from On Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Alumni Association: http://www.uwalumni.com/home/ alumniandfriends/onwisconsin/owspring2008/worms.aspx. Anderson, M. S., Horn, A. S., Risbey, K. R., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R. and Martinson, B. C. 2007. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehaviour? Findings from a national survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine 82(9): 853– 860. Angell, M. 2001. Medicine in the noise age: what can we believe? Accountability in Research 8: 189– 195. Anonymous. 2005. Timeline of a controversy. Retrieved 2009 from Nature News: http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051219/full/news051219–3.html Anonymous. 2006. Beautification and fraud. Nature Cell Biology 8: 101– 102. Anonymous. 2009. Editorial: Credit where credit is overdue. Nature Biotechnology 27: 579. Anonymous. 2010. The sequence explosion. Nature 464: 670– 671. Ashworth, P. and Bannister, P. 1997. Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perception of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education 22: 187– 104. Associated Press. 2009. Senator's affair highlights capitol temptations. Knoxville News Sentinel August 10, 2009, p. A4. Augenbraun, E. 2008. Letter to the editor. The Scientist 22(5): 17. Barnbaum, D. R. and M. Byron. 2001. Research Ethics: Text and Readings. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Bauerlein, M., Gad-el-Hak, M., Grody, W., McKelvey, B. and Trimble, S. W. 2010. We must stop the avalanche of low-quality research. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Published Online: http://chronicle.com/article/We-Must-Stop-the-Avalanche-of/65890/. Berlin, L. 2009. Plagiarism, salami slicing, and Labachevsky. Skeletal Radiology 38: 1– 4. Bordons, M. and I. Gomez. 2000. Collaboration networks in science. Pp 197– 213 in The Web of Knowledge, Cronin, B. and H. B. Atkins (eds.). American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ. Borrell, B. 2010. A pioneer's perils. The Scientist 24(11): 19. Breen, K. J. 2003. Misconduct in medical research: whose responsibility? Internal Medicine Journal 33: 186– 191. Breitling, L. P. 2005. Misconduct: pressure to achieve corrodes ideals. Nature 436: 626. Brown, A. S. and Murphy, D. R. 1989. Crytomnesia: delineating inadvertent plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 14: 432– 442. Brumfiel, G. 2008. Physicists all aflutter about data photographed at conference. Nature 455: 7. Brumfiel, G. 2009. Breaking the convention? Nature 459: 1050– 1051. Butler, D. 2010. Journals step up plagiarism policing. Nature 466: 167. Carlson, S. 2010. Lab notebook tips from a patent litigator. Genetic Engineering News 30(1): 10– 11. Carroll, J. and Appleston, J. 2001. Plagiarism: A Good Practice Guide. Oxford Brookes University, UK. Carroll, J. 2007. A Handbook for Deterring Plagiarism in Higher Education. Second Edition. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University, UK. Chalmers, I. 1990. Underreporting research is scientific misconduct. The Journal of the American Medical Association 263(10): 1405– 1408. Collberg, C., Kobourov, S., Louie, J. and Slattery, T. 2003. Splat: A System for Self-Plagiarism Detection. Retrieved 2010, from the Department of Computer Science, University of Arizona: http://splat.cs.arizona.edu/icwi_plag.pdf. Collberg, C. and Kobourov, S. 2005. Self-plagiarism in computer science. Communications of the ACM 48(4): 88– 94. Collins, J. 2001. Good to Great. Harper Business, New York. G. L. Comstock (Ed.) 2002. Life Science Ethics. Iowa State Press, Ames, IA. Couzin, J. 2006a. U.S. rules on accounting for grants amounts to more than a hill of beans. Science 311: 168– 169. Couzin, J. 2006b. Stem cells … and how the problems eluded peer reviewers and editors. Science 311: 23– 24. Couzin, J. 2006c. Truth and consequences. Science 313: 1222– 1226. Couzin-Frankel, J. 2010. The legacy plan. Science 329: 135– 137. Croll, R. P. 1984. The non-contributing author: an issue of credit and responsibility. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27: 401– 407. Cyranosaki, D. 2006. Rise and fall. Retrieved 2010 from Nature News: http://www.nature.com/news/2006/060111/full/news060109–8.html Dingell, J. D. 1993. Misconduct in medical research. The New England Journal of Medicine 328: 1610– 1615. Dreyfuss, R. 2000. Collaborative research: conflicts on authorship, ownership, and accountability. Vanderbilt Lab Review 53: 1159– 1232. Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E. and Ordway, S. 1996. Ethical issues in Biomedical Research: perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics 2: 89– 114. Errami, M. and H. Garner. 2008. A tale of two citations. Nature 451: 397– 399. Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE 4: e5738. Fischbach, R. L. and Plaza, J. 2003. The case of the promising new drug. Retrieved 2009, from Responsible Conduct of Research, Columbia University: http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_conflicts/case/index.html. Fowler, A. and R. E. Kissell, Jr. 2007. Winter relative abundance and habitat associations of swamp rabbits in eastern Arkansas, Southeastern Naturalist 6: 247– 258. Gert, B. 1997. Morality and scientific research, pp. 20– 33. Published in D. Elliott, and Stern J. E. (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H. Green, L. 2005. Reviewing the scourge of self-plagiarism. Retrieved 2010 from M/C Journal 8(5). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0510/07-green.php. Gunsalus, C. K. 1998. How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics 4: 51– 64. Ham, B. 2010. Singapore statement urges global consensus on research integrity. Science 329: 1615. Handwerker, H. 2010. Impact factor blues. European Journal of Pain 14: 3– 4. Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M. and Moran, A. C. 2006. Faculty and college student beliefs about the frequency of student academic misconduct. The Journal of Higher Education 77: 1058– 1080. Harris, R. 2001. The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies for Preventing, Dectecting, and Dealing with Plagiarism. Pyrczak Publishing, Los Angeles, CA. Hayden, E. C. 2008. Chemistry: designer debacle. Nature 453: 275– 278. Heim, R. and Tsien, R.Y. 1996. Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Current Biology 6: 178– 182. Herman, I. P. 2007. Following the law. Nature 445: 228. Hirsch, J. E. 2005. An index to quantify an individual's research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 16569– 16572. Howard, R. M. 2001. Forget about policing plagiarism. Just teach. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Published Online: http://chronicle.com/article/Forget-About-Policing/2792/ Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environment, National Research Council, and Office of Research Integrity. 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Judson, H. F. 2004. The Great Betrayal: Fraud in Science. Harcourt Inc., Orlando, FL. Kearns, H. and Gardiner, M. L. 2011. The care and maintenance of your advisor. Nature 469: 570. Koocher, G. and Keith-Spiegel, P. 2010. Peers nip misconduct in the bud. Nature 466: 438– 440. LaFollette, M. C. 1992. Stealing into Print Fraud: Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing. University of California Press, CA. Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H. and Olkin, I. 2006. The case of the misleading funnel plot. The British Medical Journal 333: 597– 600. Levine, R. J. 1988. Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research. Second Edition. Yale University Press, CT. Louis, K. S., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M. E. and Soto, M. A. 1989. Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly 34: 110– 131. Lynch, C. 2008. Big data: how do your data grow? Nature 455: 28– 29. Macrina, F. L. 2005. Scientific Integrity. Third Edition. American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, DC. Maher, B. 2010. Sabatage! Nature 467: 516– 518. Malmgren, R., Ottino, J. and Nunes Amaral, L. 2010. The role of mentorship in protégé performance. Nature 465: 622– 626. Mandavilla, A. 2011. Trial by twitter. Nature 467: 286– 287. Martin, B. 1992. Scientific fraud and the power structure of science. Prometheus 10: 83– 98. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S. and De Vries R. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435: 737– 738. Maurer, H., Kappe, F. and Zaka, B. 2006. Plagiarism – a survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science 12(8): 1050– 1084. May, M. 2009. Sharing the wealth of data. Scientific American Worldview pp. 88– 93. McCook, A. 2009. Life after fraud. The Scientist 23(7): 28– 33. McGee, G. 2007. Me first. The Scientist 12(9): 28. Munck, A. 1997. Examples of scientific misconduct. Pp. 31– 33. Published in D. Elliott and Stern J. E. (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. Nath, S. B., Marcus, S. C. and Druss, B. G. 2006. Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? Medical Journal of Australia 185: 152– 154. National Academy of Sciences. 2009. Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility, and Stew-ardship of Research Data in the Digital Age. National Academies Press, Washington DC. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2008. GenBank Statistics: Growth of GenBank. Retrieved 2010: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ genbankstats.html. National Institutes of Health. 2009. Research and training grants: Success rates by mechanism and selected activity codes. Retrieved 2010: http://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/. Nelson, B. 2009. Empty archives. Nature 461: 160– 163. Normile, D. 2009. Science retracts discredited paper; bitter patent dispute continues. Science 324: 450– 451. Park, C. 2003. In other (people's) words: plagiarism by university students – literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 28: 471– 488. Pearson, H. 2009. Being Bob Langer. Nature 458: 22– 24. Pecorari, D. 2003. Good and original: plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 317– 345. Pennycook, A. 1996. Borrowing others' words: text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly 30(2): 201– 230. Pool, R. 1997. More squabbling over unbelievable result. Pp. 117– 138. Published in D. Elliott and Stern J. E. (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, N.H. Prasher, D. C., Eckenrode, V. K., Ward, W.W., Prendergrast, F. G. and Cormier, M. J. 1992. Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Gene 111: 229– 233. Pryor, E. R., Habermann, B. and Broome, M. E. 2007. Scientific misconduct from the perspective of research coordinators: a national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics 33: 365– 369. Qiu, J. 2010. Publish or perish in China. Nature 463: 142– 143. Refinetti, R. 2011. Publish and flourish. Science 331: 29. Reich, E. S. 2009. Plastic Fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud in Physics Shook the Scientific World. Palgrave Macmillan, NY. Reich, E. S. 2010. Self-plagiarism case prompts calls for agencies to tighten rules. Nature 468: 745. Reis, R. 1999. Choosing a research topic. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Published Online: http://chronicle.com/article/Choosing-a-Research-Topic/45641/. Rosser, M. and Yamada, K. M. 2004. What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation. Journal of Cell Biology 166: 11– 15. Scollon, R. 1995. Plagiarism and ideology: identity in intercultural discourse. Language in Society. 24: 1– 28. Shamoo, A. E. and Resnik, D. B. 2003. Responsible Conduct of Research. Oxford University Press, NY. Siegel, D. and Baveye, P. 2010. Battling the paper glut. Science 329: 1466. Smith, R. 2006. Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99: 232– 237. Spier, R. 2002. The history of the peer-review process. Trends in Biotechnology 20: 357– 358. Stewart, C.N. Jr. and Edwards, J. E. 2008. How to teach research ethics. The Scientist 22(2): 27. Swazey, J., Anderson, M. and Louis, K. 1993. Ethical problems in academic research: A survey of doctoral candidates and faculty raises important questions about the ethical environment of graduate education and research. American Scientist 81: 542– 553. Swazey, J. and Bird, S. 1997. Teaching and learning research ethics. Pp. 1– 19. Published in D. Elliott and J. E. Stern (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. Thorisson, G. A. 2009. Accreditation and attribution in data sharing. Nature Biotechnology 27: 984– 985. Titus, S., Wells, J. and Rhoades, L. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature 453: 980– 982. Titus, S. and Bosch, X. 2010. Tie funding to research integrity. Nature 466: 436– 438. Van Noorden, R. 2010. A profusion of measures. Nature 465: 864– 866. Vasgird, D. and Fischbach, R. 2003. Who is an author? Retrieved 2009 from Responsible Conduct of Research, Columbia University: http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/rcr/rcr_authorship/case/index.html. Waldrop, M. 2008. Wikiomics. Nature 455: 22– 25. Wang, K. 2005. Education and penalties are key to tackling misconduct. Nature 436: 626. Warren, W. L. and Cao, S. A. 2009. Certainty not required for inventorship. Genetic Engineering News 29: 10, 12. Watland, A. M., Schauber, E. M. and A. Woolf. 2007. Translocation of swamp rabbits in eastern Illinois. Southeastern Naturalist 6: 259– 270. Watson, J. D. 1968. The Double Helix: a Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New American Library, NY. Weil, V. and Arzbaecher, R. 1997. Relationships in laboratories and research communities. Pp. 69– 90. Published in D. Elliott and J. E. Stern (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. Weston, A. 2002. A Practical Companion to Ethics, Second Edition. Oxford University Press, NY. Wilson, J. R. 2002. Responsible authorship and peer review. Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 155– 174. Winter S. 2010. Former Wisconsin researcher sentenced for misconduct. BioTechniques Newsletter September 23 2010, http://www.biotechniques.com/ news/Former-Wisconsin-researcher-sentenced-for-misconduct/biotechniques-302891.html?utm_source=BioTechniques+Newsletters+%2526+e-Alerts&utm_campaign=d9d482b24e-BioTechniques_Weekly&utm_medium=email (last accessed November 17 2010). Woolf, P. 1997. Pressure to publish and fraud in science. Pp. 141– 145 Published in D. Elliott and J. E. Stern (eds), Research Ethics. University Press of New England, Hanover, NH. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F. and Uzzi, B. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316: 1036– 1039. Yank, V. and Barnes, D. 2003. Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. Journal of Medical Ethics 29: 109– 114. Zhang, Y. 2010. Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized. Nature 467: 153. Research Ethics for Scientists: A Companion for Students ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W4211232462 created "2022-02-13" @default.
• W4211232462 date "2011-09-15" @default.
• W4211232462 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4211232462 title "References" @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1536760156 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1597885939 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1675968635 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1965631677 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1967066444 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1969045972 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1970527458 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1972649544 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1973370066 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1973651171 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1975594330 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1975867488 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1979710795 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1981127147 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1982159589 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1991976654 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1994202137 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W1998223573 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2004776253 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2013528483 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2014293907 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2016587451 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2021552921 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2025647655 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2026490928 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2029084939 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2033187618 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2034953475 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2034979567 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2043297353 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2044841475 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2048524743 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2053428119 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2055295408 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2056273381 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2057496019 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2058980390 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2060349825 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2061476066 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2065267852 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2067878796 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2068797287 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2072804502 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2077835601 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2087858192 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2093393114 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2094822220 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2095161016 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2098827191 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2098862431 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2104504372 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2105319798 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2106528504 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2114038092 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2118062583 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2124746743 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2128438887 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2130917801 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2138833446 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2152243616 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2154287942 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2162288255 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2168793514 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2321666388 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2341408565 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W2491514698 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W4234392219 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W4250273625 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W4251886945 @default.
• W4211232462 cites W4293775847 @default.
• W4211232462 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119978862.refs" @default.
• W4211232462 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W4211232462 type Work @default.
• W4211232462 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4211232462 crossrefType "other" @default.
• W4211232462 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4211232462 hasConceptScore W4211232462C41008148 @default.
• W4211232462 hasLocation W42112324621 @default.
• W4211232462 hasOpenAccess W4211232462 @default.
• W4211232462 hasPrimaryLocation W42112324621 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W1596801655 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2130043461 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2350741829 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2358668433 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2376932109 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2382290278 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2390279801 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4211232462 hasRelatedWork W2530322880 @default.
• W4211232462 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4211232462 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4211232462 workType "other" @default.