FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4212834333> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4212834333 abstract "Purpose The authors investigate the effects of four basic bodice pattern shapes and developing methods on the appearances of ladies' fitted bodice design. The authors also clarify the preferred appearance among the four ladies' fitted bodice design as reported by Japanese university students and propose a pattern developing method of the preferred bodice design using the four basic bodices. Design/methodology/approach Targeting a ladies' fitted bodice design with designated dimensions, four ladies' fitted bodices were manufactured using four types of basic bodice pattern and their development methods: BUNKA from Japan, ESMOD from France, ARMSTRONG from the United States, and ALDRICH from the United Kingdom. The appearances of the four fitted bodices were observed and explained in terms of ease and darts. The authors also conducted a sensory test regarding the preferred shirt appearance adopting a semantical difference method, for 15 female Japanese university students in their twenties. The authors propose a pattern developing method to design the preferred fitted bodice shape using different basic bodices considering the amount and allocation of ease and size and allocation of darts to front and back of the bodice. Findings The appearances of the bodices were different even for the same fitted bodice design depending on the type of basic bodice pattern and its developing method. BUNKA had a slightly constricted silhouette at the waist and ESMOD had a straight silhouette and less constriction. ARMSTRONG had the most constricted silhouette and rounded hips and ALDRICH had a slightly constricted curve from the bust to the hips. The shape differences were strongly related to the amount of ease and the difference in waist darts between front and back of the bodice. The Japanese participants preferred fitted bodices that have a constricted silhouette from front and back views. From the side view, a straight line at the front and a constricted shape and emphasized hip at the back silhouette were preferred. By adjusting the allocations of ease and waist darts to front and back of the bodice, it was possible to design the preferred fitted bodice shape even with different basic pattern. Originality/value It was found that the basic bodice pattern and developing method affect the final clothing. It is necessary to adjust the allocation of ease and darts to front and back of the bodice to construct clothing using different patternmaking methods. It was shown that it is more important to consider the patternmaking method than to select a suitable basic bodice pattern. It is necessary to understand the characteristics of allocation and amount of ease and the allocation and size of waist darts in both the basic patternmaking method and developing method. This approach is also useful in making an article of clothing with a shape required in other countries." @default.
• W4212834333 created "2022-02-24" @default.
• W4212834333 creator A5010948764 @default.
• W4212834333 creator A5045189436 @default.
• W4212834333 creator A5058592103 @default.
• W4212834333 date "2022-02-01" @default.
• W4212834333 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4212834333 title "Developing a basic pattern for a design based on the comparison of four basic pattern approaches" @default.
• W4212834333 cites W1909321811 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W1969618863 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2049165955 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2062825911 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2095985485 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2146799204 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2164449030 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2520253211 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2532582543 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2766540429 @default.
• W4212834333 cites W2950751479 @default.
• W4212834333 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcst-03-2021-0038" @default.
• W4212834333 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4212834333 type Work @default.
• W4212834333 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4212834333 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4212834333 hasAuthorship W4212834333A5010948764 @default.
• W4212834333 hasAuthorship W4212834333A5045189436 @default.
• W4212834333 hasAuthorship W4212834333A5058592103 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C199639397 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConcept C58103923 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C127413603 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C154945302 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C199639397 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C33923547 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C41008148 @default.
• W4212834333 hasConceptScore W4212834333C58103923 @default.
• W4212834333 hasIssue "ahead-of-print" @default.
• W4212834333 hasLocation W42128343331 @default.
• W4212834333 hasOpenAccess W4212834333 @default.
• W4212834333 hasPrimaryLocation W42128343331 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W1482914977 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W1909321811 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W2094718674 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W2362439850 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W2391400078 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W2905873359 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W2914641848 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W3020450771 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W3161723505 @default.
• W4212834333 hasRelatedWork W243435157 @default.
• W4212834333 hasVolume "ahead-of-print" @default.
• W4212834333 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4212834333 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4212834333 workType "article" @default.