FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4214625159> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4214625159 endingPage "290" @default.
• W4214625159 startingPage "290" @default.
• W4214625159 abstract "Central MessageThe true value of receiving an AATS Foundation award has implications beyond the award itself.See Article page 282.In this edition of JTCVS Open, Aranda-Michel and colleagues1Aranda-Michel E. Luketich J.D. Rao R. Morell V.O. Arnaoutakis G.J. Kilic A. et al.The effect of receiving an award from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Foundation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2022; 10: 282-289Scopus (2) Google Scholar examine the relationship between receiving either a research scholarship or a surgical investigator award from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS). Specifically, they took the list of awardees for a specified time period and looked at their subsequent publication and citation record, the National Institutes of Health funding, and academic promotion. They found that this group did very well in all categories examined and thus conclude that receiving such an award “positions early-career cardiothoracic surgeons for a promising future in academic surgery.”There is no doubt that these awards are very valuable and helpful to the receiving individuals. In selected circumstances, they facilitate work that indeed may provide opportunities not otherwise available, leading to a successful career in academic surgery. However, several issues remain in question. Are the awards simply a marker of an individual's motivation, resources, and mentorship? How often do they in fact provide opportunities that may not exist? What is the outcome for those who apply but are not granted an award? Do the awards foster a career in academic surgery or are those who get to this point resolved to pursue such a career regardless? Much of this might be addressed in true research fashion by the addition of a comparison group in the analysis, a point conceded by the authors. The comparison group may not only be those who applied for the award, but the cohort of young academic surgeons as a whole. Unfortunately, with the available methods, this is not possible.It is also important to note that although the inference is related to academic careers as a whole, the analysis is skewed toward research. As mentioned in the article, academic efforts typically include activity in education, service, as well as research. With citations and funding, research tends to be a much more quantifiable activity. However, not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.2Cameron W.B. Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking. Random House, New York1963Google ScholarRegardless, this study does demonstrate the association these awards have with early academic success, as measured by contributions to the literature, obtaining additional funding, and academic promotion. They and others like them are worthy of our continued support. The true value of receiving an AATS Foundation award has implications beyond the award itself. The true value of receiving an AATS Foundation award has implications beyond the award itself. See Article page 282. See Article page 282. In this edition of JTCVS Open, Aranda-Michel and colleagues1Aranda-Michel E. Luketich J.D. Rao R. Morell V.O. Arnaoutakis G.J. Kilic A. et al.The effect of receiving an award from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Foundation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Open. 2022; 10: 282-289Scopus (2) Google Scholar examine the relationship between receiving either a research scholarship or a surgical investigator award from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS). Specifically, they took the list of awardees for a specified time period and looked at their subsequent publication and citation record, the National Institutes of Health funding, and academic promotion. They found that this group did very well in all categories examined and thus conclude that receiving such an award “positions early-career cardiothoracic surgeons for a promising future in academic surgery.” There is no doubt that these awards are very valuable and helpful to the receiving individuals. In selected circumstances, they facilitate work that indeed may provide opportunities not otherwise available, leading to a successful career in academic surgery. However, several issues remain in question. Are the awards simply a marker of an individual's motivation, resources, and mentorship? How often do they in fact provide opportunities that may not exist? What is the outcome for those who apply but are not granted an award? Do the awards foster a career in academic surgery or are those who get to this point resolved to pursue such a career regardless? Much of this might be addressed in true research fashion by the addition of a comparison group in the analysis, a point conceded by the authors. The comparison group may not only be those who applied for the award, but the cohort of young academic surgeons as a whole. Unfortunately, with the available methods, this is not possible. It is also important to note that although the inference is related to academic careers as a whole, the analysis is skewed toward research. As mentioned in the article, academic efforts typically include activity in education, service, as well as research. With citations and funding, research tends to be a much more quantifiable activity. However, not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted.2Cameron W.B. Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking. Random House, New York1963Google Scholar Regardless, this study does demonstrate the association these awards have with early academic success, as measured by contributions to the literature, obtaining additional funding, and academic promotion. They and others like them are worthy of our continued support. The effect of receiving an award from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery FoundationJTCVS OpenVol. 10PreviewThis study's objective was to evaluate the scholastic and career effects of receiving either the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Foundation research scholarship or surgical investigator program. Full-Text PDF Open Access" @default.
• W4214625159 created "2022-03-02" @default.
• W4214625159 creator A5033676458 @default.
• W4214625159 date "2022-06-01" @default.
• W4214625159 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4214625159 title "Commentary: Chicken or egg?" @default.
• W4214625159 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2021.11.016" @default.
• W4214625159 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36004226" @default.
• W4214625159 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4214625159 type Work @default.
• W4214625159 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4214625159 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4214625159 hasAuthorship W4214625159A5033676458 @default.
• W4214625159 hasBestOaLocation W42146251591 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C160022790 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C2776535583 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConcept C98147612 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C119857082 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C141071460 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C15744967 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C160022790 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C161191863 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C17744445 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C199539241 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C2776291640 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C2776535583 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C2778061430 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C2778805511 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C2780966255 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C41008148 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C509550671 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C71924100 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C94625758 @default.
• W4214625159 hasConceptScore W4214625159C98147612 @default.
• W4214625159 hasFunder F4320307813 @default.
• W4214625159 hasLocation W42146251591 @default.
• W4214625159 hasLocation W42146251592 @default.
• W4214625159 hasLocation W42146251593 @default.
• W4214625159 hasLocation W42146251594 @default.
• W4214625159 hasOpenAccess W4214625159 @default.
• W4214625159 hasPrimaryLocation W42146251591 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W1987453651 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2264999612 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2355533134 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2981870463 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W2990426919 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W3091297984 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W4286262946 @default.
• W4214625159 hasRelatedWork W4286381274 @default.
• W4214625159 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W4214625159 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4214625159 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4214625159 workType "article" @default.