FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4214831084> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4214831084 abstract "Three-Phase Relative Permeability Correlations L.E. Baker L.E. Baker Amoco Production Co. Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 1988. Paper Number: SPE-17369-MS https://doi.org/10.2118/17369-MS Published: April 16 1988 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Baker, L.E. Three-Phase Relative Permeability Correlations. Paper presented at the SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 1988. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/17369-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsSociety of Petroleum Engineers (SPE)SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractSeveral correlations have been proposed for prediction of three-phase relative permeability from two-phase data or from saturation/capillary-pressure relationships. These include the models of Stone, Hirasaki, Corey et al., Naar and Wygal, Land, Aleman, and Parker et al. This paper compares predictions of these models with predictions of two additional models (saturation-weighted interpolation and true-linear interpolation). The comparison is made using all the published three-phase experimental relative permeability data complete enough for application of the models.The comparison shows that the models are often not very good predictors of the experimental data. This points out a need for better relative permeability models in cases where three-phase flow may have a significant effect. In most cases, straight-line interpolation or saturation-weighted interpolation between the permeabilities at the two-phase boundaries of the three-phase flow region provided a better fit of the experimental data than did the theoretically-based models.The paper also demonstrates the utility of comparing the effects of different relative permeability models before using them in a reservoir simulation. Sometimes the result of a simulation can be heavily biased by the choice of relative permeability model used.IntroductionThree-phase relative permeability measurements and correlation methods have been reported in the literature since 1941. This paper lists the sources of published three-phase relative permeability data and compares the simple correlation methods which have been proposed for prediction of three-phase relative permeability. Two additional interpolation methods are proposed and compared to the published methods.DiscussionData Sources for Three-Phase Relative PermeabilityThree-phase (gas/oil/water) relative permeability data for water-wet sandpacks have been reported by Leverett and Lewis, Reid, Hosain, Snell and Ivanov. Three-phase data for water-wet cores have been reported by Caudle, et al. Corey, et al. Sarem, Donaldson and Dean, Saraf, Juckert; Saraf et al., van Spronsen, Holmgren and Morse, Slack and Ehrlich and Schneider and Owens. Very limited three-phase data for oil-wet cores (gas and water relative permeabilities at constant, non-flowing oil saturation) were published by Schneider and Owens. Descriptions of the test procedures and calculation methods are available in the original references. Donaldson and Kayser provide a summary of the test protocols and results for most of the data published prior to 1980.The data for water-wet cores and for sandpacks show generally consistent behavior; isoperms (contours of constant phase relative permeability) for gas and water primarily depend on the gas or water saturation respectively, and are weak functions of the saturations of other phases present. The permeability to each phase is clearly affected by the saturation history when there is hysteresis between the inhibition and drainage curves for that phase. These data indicate that a strongly wetting phase (water) and a non-wetting phase (gas) are affected little by interactions with other phases (except for the physical obstruction caused by the presence of the other phases). An intermediate wetting phase (oil) appears to be more influenced by interactions with the other phases. The nature of the inter action is not clear, however.P. 539^ Keywords: upstream oil & gas, artificial intelligence, saturation, gas saturation, correlation, method ii, permeability, fluid dynamics, oil saturation, linear interpolation Subjects: Reservoir Fluid Dynamics, Improved and Enhanced Recovery, Flow in porous media This content is only available via PDF. 1988. Society of Petroleum Engineers You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W4214831084 created "2022-03-05" @default.
• W4214831084 creator A5051135481 @default.
• W4214831084 date "1988-04-01" @default.
• W4214831084 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4214831084 title "Three-Phase Relative Permeability Correlations" @default.
• W4214831084 doi "https://doi.org/10.2523/17369-ms" @default.
• W4214831084 hasPublicationYear "1988" @default.
• W4214831084 type Work @default.
• W4214831084 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4214831084 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4214831084 hasAuthorship W4214831084A5051135481 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C113378726 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C120882062 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C23123220 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C6648577 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConcept C9930424 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C113378726 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C114614502 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C120882062 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C127413603 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C161191863 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C185592680 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C187320778 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C23123220 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C2778805511 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C33923547 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C41008148 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C41625074 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C55493867 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C6648577 @default.
• W4214831084 hasConceptScore W4214831084C9930424 @default.
• W4214831084 hasLocation W42148310841 @default.
• W4214831084 hasOpenAccess W4214831084 @default.
• W4214831084 hasPrimaryLocation W42148310841 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2016373377 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2046399768 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2087528413 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2139472192 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2258214961 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2369991355 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2896741139 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W2981796480 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W3098075645 @default.
• W4214831084 hasRelatedWork W4206789459 @default.
• W4214831084 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4214831084 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4214831084 workType "article" @default.