FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4214895790> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4214895790 endingPage "1350" @default.
• W4214895790 startingPage "1342" @default.
• W4214895790 abstract "Abstract Background The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is well known and commonly used to assess young, active patients with ACL injuries. However, this application of the outcome measure has been called into question. There is currently no evidence supporting the structural validity of the KOOS for this patient population. Structural validity refers to whether a questionnaire meant to provide scores on different subscales behaves as intended in the populations of interest. Structural validity should be assessed for all questionnaire measures with multiple items or subscales. Questions/purposes Does the KOOS demonstrate adequate structural validity in young, active patients with ACL tears, when evaluated using (1) exploratory and (2) confirmatory factor analyses? Methods Between January 2014 and March 2017, 1033 patients were screened for eligibility in the Stability 1 randomized controlled trial from nine centers in Canada and Europe. Patients were eligible if they had an ACL deficient knee, were between 14 and 25 years old, and were thought to be at higher risk of reinjury based on the presence of two or more of the following factors: participation in pivoting sports, presence of a Grade 2 pivot shift or greater, generalized ligamentous laxity (Beighton score of 4 or greater), or genu recurvatum greater than 10°. Based on this criteria, 367 patients were ineligible and another 48 declined to participate. In total, 618 patients were randomized into the trial. Of the trial participants, 98% (605 of 618) of patients had complete baseline KOOS questionnaire data available for this analysis. Based on study inclusion criteria, the baseline KOOS data from the Stability 1 trial represents an appropriate sample to investigate the structural validity of the KOOS, specifically for the young, active ACL deficient population. A cross sectional retrospective secondary data analysis of the Stability 1 baseline KOOS data was completed to assess the structural validity of the KOOS using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Exploratory factor analysis investigates how all questionnaire items group together based on their conceptual similarity in a specific sample. Confirmatory factor analysis is similar but used often in a second stage to test and confirm a proposed structure of the subscales. These methods were used to assess the established five-factor structure of the KOOS (symptoms [seven items], pain [nine items], activities of daily living [17 items], sport and recreation [five items], and quality of life [four items]) in young active patients with ACL tears. Incremental posthoc modifications, such as correlating questionnaire items or moving items to different subscales, were made to the model structure until adequate fit was achieved. Model fit was assessed using chi-square, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and an associated 90% confidence interval, comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), as well as standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). Adequate fit was defined as a CFI and TLI > 0.9, and RMSEA and SRMR < 0.08. Results Structural validity of the KOOS was not confirmed when evaluated using (1) exploratory or (2) confirmatory factor analyses. The exploratory factor analysis, where the 42 KOOS items were allowed to group naturally, did not reflect adequate fit for a five-factor model (TLI = 0.828). Similarly, the confirmatory factor analysis used to investigate the KOOS structure as it was originally developed, revealed inadequate fit in our sample (RMSEA = 0.088 [90% CI 0.086 to 0.091]). Our analysis suggested a modified four-factor structure may be more appropriate in young, active ACL deficient patients; however, the final version presented here is not appropriate for clinical use because of the number and nature of post-hoc modifications required to reach adequate fit indices. Conclusion The established five-factor structure of the KOOS did not hold true in our sample of young, active patients undergoing ACL reconstruction, indicating poor structural validity. Clinical Relevance We question the utility and interpretability of KOOS subscale scores for young, active patients with ACL tears with the current form of the KOOS. A modified version of the KOOS, adjusted for this patient population, is needed to better reflect and interpret the outcomes and recovery trajectory in this high-functioning group. A separate analysis with a defined a priori development plan would be needed to create a valid alternative." @default.
• W4214895790 created "2022-03-05" @default.
• W4214895790 creator A5009878262 @default.
• W4214895790 creator A5011729863 @default.
• W4214895790 creator A5072967513 @default.
• W4214895790 creator A5074329558 @default.
• W4214895790 date "2022-03-02" @default.
• W4214895790 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4214895790 title "The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Does Not Have Adequate Structural Validity for Use With Young, Active Patients With ACL Tears" @default.
• W4214895790 cites W1913957972 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2022692172 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2032300752 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2049008989 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2071666535 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2076653261 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2171762906 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2923413722 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2947670564 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W2998968784 @default.
• W4214895790 cites W3044686577 @default.
• W4214895790 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002158" @default.
• W4214895790 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35238805" @default.
• W4214895790 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4214895790 type Work @default.
• W4214895790 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W4214895790 countsByYear W42148957902022 @default.
• W4214895790 countsByYear W42148957902023 @default.
• W4214895790 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4214895790 hasAuthorship W4214895790A5009878262 @default.
• W4214895790 hasAuthorship W4214895790A5011729863 @default.
• W4214895790 hasAuthorship W4214895790A5072967513 @default.
• W4214895790 hasAuthorship W4214895790A5074329558 @default.
• W4214895790 hasBestOaLocation W42148957901 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C111278954 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C174106493 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C2778275304 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C43893838 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C111278954 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C141071460 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C142724271 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C15744967 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C168563851 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C174106493 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C1862650 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C204787440 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C2776164576 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C2778275304 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C2908647359 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C43893838 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C71924100 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C77805123 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C99454951 @default.
• W4214895790 hasConceptScore W4214895790C99508421 @default.
• W4214895790 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W4214895790 hasLocation W42148957901 @default.
• W4214895790 hasLocation W42148957902 @default.
• W4214895790 hasLocation W42148957903 @default.
• W4214895790 hasLocation W42148957904 @default.
• W4214895790 hasOpenAccess W4214895790 @default.
• W4214895790 hasPrimaryLocation W42148957901 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W1997896518 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2053379424 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2076691999 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2130795673 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2172130162 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2317076135 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2789751163 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2897343059 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W2981006354 @default.
• W4214895790 hasRelatedWork W4282929412 @default.
• W4214895790 hasVolume "480" @default.
• W4214895790 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4214895790 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4214895790 workType "article" @default.