Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220690790> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W4220690790 abstract "<p>Global hydrological models (GHMs) are a fundamental component of the Earth&#160;System Modeling &#160;initiative that aims to realize a Digital Twin in the&#160;next five to ten years [1]. Recent model evaluations of the state-of-the-art&#160;global hydrological models [2,3], however, indicate that existing models have&#160;several deficiencies that lead to poor model efficiencies of key&#160;terrestrial environmental variables such as runoff, evapotranspiration, and&#160;soil moisture, among others.&#160;</p><p>In this study, we evaluate four hydrological models: JULES, HTESSEL,&#160;mHM, and PCR-GLOBWB. These models are part of the modelling chain of the&#160;Copernicus Climate Change Service project ULYSSES [4], which aims to&#160;deliver global operational hydrological forecasts at a spatial&#160;resolution of 0.1$^circ$. The operational service started in July 2020&#160;and the data will be provided every month through the Copernicus Data&#160;Store.</p><p>The initial conditions of the GHMs for the hindcast skill assessment are&#160;obtained with the ERA5-land reanalysis [5]. This global dataset provides&#160;meteorological forcings (e.g., precipitation and temperature) since 1950&#160;with daily time steps. For this reason, historical simulations of&#160;streamflow, obtained with these GHMs from 1981 until 2020 will be&#160;cross-evaluated against observed streamflow provided by 2850 GRDC&#160;gauging stations. Simulations of evapotranspiration and terrestrial&#160;water storage anomalies were evaluated against GRACE and FLUXNET&#160;datasets, respectively.</p><p>During the model calibration phase, models were evaluated in a&#160;stratified sample of size 120 basins (i.e., considering hydroclimatic&#160;regions and locations around the world). The results of the evaluation&#160;indicate that the median value of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency obtained&#160;with daily streamflow for these models varies from 0.20 to 0.50. The&#160;mean Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) metric ranges from 0.45 to 0.63. The&#160;maximum KGE value corresponds to the mHM model, while the other models&#160;are clustered around 0.45.</p><p>This result alone is quite promising considering the results presented&#160;in Beck et al. [2]. One reason for these good results is the relation&#160;between the standardization of the input data sets and the common&#160;routing model (mRM [6]) with a very detailed river network [7]. The&#160;considerable difference in performance between mHM and the other GHMs&#160;can be attributed to the parameterization of the models and model&#160;structure. mHM is the only GHM that employs the MPR technique [8] and&#160;includes fast and slow interflow components. Evaluation metrics obtained&#160;with the ILAMB [8] tool indicate that all models have exhibited&#160;satisfactory efficiencies (> 0.5 variable score) for monthly&#160;climatologies of latent heat, evapotranspiration and runoff. mHM, JULES,&#160;and PCR-GLOBWB, perform relatively well, representing the terrestrial&#160;water storage anomaly, although any of these models have explicit a&#160;detailed representation of the groundwater aquifers.</p><p>In this presentation, specific results of the model cross-validation,&#160;per geographic region will be presented. Finally, recommendations for&#160;further GHM model improvement will be discussed.</p><p><strong>References</strong>:<br>[1] Bauer, P. et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-021-00023-0 &#160;2021<br>[2] Beck, H.E., et al. &#160;https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018247, 2016.<br>[3] Harrigan, S et al. https://doi.org/doi:10.5194/essd-12-2043-2020 2020.&#160;<br>[4] https://www.ufz.de/ulysses, ECMWF/COPERNICUS/2019/C3S_432_Lot3_UFZ<br>[5] https://www.ecmwf.int/en/era5-land<br>[6] Thober et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-2501-2019, 2019<br>[7] http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~yamadai/cama-flood/index.html<br>[8] Samaniego et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007327, 2010<br>[9] https://www.ilamb.org.&#160;</p>" @default.
- W4220690790 created "2022-04-03" @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5007680529 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5010664324 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5042286266 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5043163094 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5043362415 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5062523421 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5074831637 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5084795321 @default.
- W4220690790 creator A5091297909 @default.
- W4220690790 date "2022-03-27" @default.
- W4220690790 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W4220690790 title "Multivariate evaluation of four high-resolution hydrological models at  global scale" @default.
- W4220690790 doi "https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-4372" @default.
- W4220690790 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4220690790 type Work @default.
- W4220690790 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4220690790 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5007680529 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5010664324 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5042286266 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5043163094 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5043362415 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5062523421 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5074831637 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5084795321 @default.
- W4220690790 hasAuthorship W4220690790A5091297909 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C107054158 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C168754636 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C176783924 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C180526460 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C181199279 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C2778760939 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C83002819 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C107054158 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C121332964 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C132651083 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C153294291 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C168754636 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C176783924 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C180526460 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C181199279 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C185592680 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C18903297 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C2778760939 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C39432304 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C55493867 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C83002819 @default.
- W4220690790 hasConceptScore W4220690790C86803240 @default.
- W4220690790 hasLocation W42206907901 @default.
- W4220690790 hasOpenAccess W4220690790 @default.
- W4220690790 hasPrimaryLocation W42206907901 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W11455132 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W13792739 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W21323933 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W23307810 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W25560158 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W41770087 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W42661693 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W49345134 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W56027410 @default.
- W4220690790 hasRelatedWork W56565892 @default.
- W4220690790 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4220690790 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4220690790 workType "article" @default.