FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220732690> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220732690 endingPage "13" @default.
• W4220732690 startingPage "P3" @default.
• W4220732690 abstract "Abstract Background The suture scaffold technique (SST) is one of the oncoplastic techniques used for breast-conserving surgery (BCS), first reported in 2010. There is no report about the cosmetic outcome of SST, so we investigated SST patient satisfaction compared with other techniques. Method We started using the SST in August 2017. The SST requires the construction of scaffolds by using non-absorbable strings in the defect during BCS. The strings are pulled together and tied as close as possible without dimpling the skin from the superior to the inferior direction and medial to the defect's lateral direction. After approval by our institutional ethics committee in September 2020, we started a patient survey using the BREAST-QTM-BCT module (postoperative) version 2.0. We included the patients who received BCS from August 2017 to September 2019, except for cT3, patients who received nipple excision or bilateral breast surgery at our institution. The raw sum scale scores of BREAST-QTM were converted into one score that ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). A score of 4 points is considered to be of minimal importance in breast reconstructive surgery. We utilized a multivariable linear regression model to identify the clinical factors associated with the score. The confounding variables included age, density of the breast, nipple-tumor distance, size of the tumor, location of the tumor, number of lymph nodes dissected, blood loss, and operative duration. Result We identified 437 eligible patients during the study period. Among them, 49 (11.7%) patients received no oncoplastic technique (NOT), 237 (56.8%) patients received mobilization technique of breast tissue (MTB), and 151 (36.2%) patients received SST. SST patients had a higher score than NOT and MTB patients in univariable analysis. In a multivariable model, SST patients had a significantly higher score than NOT (+7.1, 95%CI=0.5-13.0, p=0.03) and an equivalent score to MTB (+1.9, 95%CI=-1.9-5.8, p=0.32) patients. In addition, smaller tumors (+0.13; 95%CI=0.01-0.25) and cases with longer nipple-tumor distance (+1.1; 95%CI=0.24-1.9) showed significantly higher score. Conclusion Among patients who received BCS, the SST patients had higher satisfaction than NOT and equivalent satisfaction to MTB. Additional studies are needed to determine the indications and the limitations of this technique. Table. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for estimating the variables that may affect Rasch score who underwent BCS. Multivariate logistic regression analyses for estimating the variables that may affect Rasch score.Rasch score95% CIp-valueOncoplastic techniqueNOT (49)0 (Reference)BMT (237)5.1-0.7~11.10.08SST (151)7.10.88-13.40.02NTD (cm)1.10.2-1.90.01Size of the tumor (mm)-0.13-0.25~-0.010.02 Citation Format: Reiko Mitsueda, Anri Gen, Yoshitaka Fujiki, Naomi Gondo, Mutsumi Sato, Junko Kawano, Koichi Kuninaka, Shuichi Kanemitsu, Megumi Teraoka, Yoshito Matsuyama, Shinichi Baba, Sugako Nomoto, Robert Sloan, Yoshiaki Rai, Yoshiaki Sagara, Yasuaki Sagara. A cross-sectional study to investigate association between oncoplastic techniques and patient satisfaction who received breast-conserving surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-13." @default.
• W4220732690 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5010869988 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5013349209 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5019935492 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5023097678 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5034574453 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5038883616 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5042574154 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5044478653 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5045445574 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5047929261 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5048201058 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5055431897 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5056438673 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5079287797 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5086362479 @default.
• W4220732690 creator A5088219467 @default.
• W4220732690 date "2022-02-15" @default.
• W4220732690 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W4220732690 title "Abstract P3-18-13: A cross-sectional study to investigate association between oncoplastic techniques and patient satisfaction who received breast-conserving surgery" @default.
• W4220732690 doi "https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p3-18-13" @default.
• W4220732690 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220732690 type Work @default.
• W4220732690 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4220732690 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5010869988 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5013349209 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5019935492 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5023097678 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5034574453 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5038883616 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5042574154 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5044478653 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5045445574 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5047929261 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5048201058 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5055431897 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5056438673 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5079287797 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5086362479 @default.
• W4220732690 hasAuthorship W4220732690A5088219467 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2775897962 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2777704003 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2777757722 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2781467025 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C2908899526 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C121608353 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C126322002 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C141071460 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2775897962 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2775944032 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2777327002 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2777704003 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2777757722 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2781467025 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C2908899526 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C530470458 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C71924100 @default.
• W4220732690 hasConceptScore W4220732690C77350462 @default.
• W4220732690 hasIssue "4_Supplement" @default.
• W4220732690 hasLocation W42207326901 @default.
• W4220732690 hasOpenAccess W4220732690 @default.
• W4220732690 hasPrimaryLocation W42207326901 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W1997569146 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2020453133 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2091703780 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2308535253 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2518207076 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2801434205 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2809232222 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2949361311 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W2979021314 @default.
• W4220732690 hasRelatedWork W3198769382 @default.
• W4220732690 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W4220732690 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220732690 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220732690 workType "article" @default.