FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220753255> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220753255 endingPage "041005" @default.
• W4220753255 startingPage "041005" @default.
• W4220753255 abstract "Abstract The climate crisis illustrates the critical need for earth and environmental models to assess the Earth’s past and future by translating emissions into climate signals and subsequent impacts regarding floods, droughts, or heatwaves, as well as future resource availability. While computational models grow in relevance by guiding policies and public discourse, our trust in these models is put to the test. A recent study estimates that 93% of hydrology and water resources published studies cannot be reproduced. In this perspective, we question whether we are amid a reproducibility crisis in the computational earth sciences and peek behind the curtain of everyday research. Software development has become an integral part of research in most areas, including the earth sciences, where computational models and data processing algorithms become increasingly sophisticated to solve the challenges of our time. Paradoxically, this development poses a threat to scientific progress: Reproducibility, as an essential pillar of science, is increasingly difficult to reach or even to test. This trend is particularly worrisome as scientific results have potentially controversial implications for stakeholders and policymakers and may influence public opinion and decisions for a long time. In recent years, progress towards Open Science has led to more publishers demanding access to data and source code alongside peer-reviewed manuscripts; but recent studies still find that less reproducible research may be even cited more frequently. We argue that we insufficiently understand how the earth science community currently attempts to reproduce computational results and what challenges they face in this effort. To what do scientists attribute this lack of reproducibility in computational earth sciences, and what are possible solutions? In this perspective we survey the community on what they think is necessary and paint a picture of a future that fosters reproducible computational science and thus trust." @default.
• W4220753255 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220753255 creator A5021083038 @default.
• W4220753255 creator A5031809088 @default.
• W4220753255 creator A5054124464 @default.
• W4220753255 creator A5075825809 @default.
• W4220753255 date "2022-03-25" @default.
• W4220753255 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W4220753255 title "The critical need to foster computational reproducibility" @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2008985174 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2080130800 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2302501749 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2406493898 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2414283705 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2526372752 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2560471521 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2570760970 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2604148521 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2916844102 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W2955371326 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3012025739 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3037038797 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3080258022 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3102028509 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3103145119 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3132316791 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W3138927052 @default.
• W4220753255 cites W4210901911 @default.
• W4220753255 doi "https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5cf8" @default.
• W4220753255 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220753255 type Work @default.
• W4220753255 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4220753255 countsByYear W42207532552023 @default.
• W4220753255 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220753255 hasAuthorship W4220753255A5021083038 @default.
• W4220753255 hasAuthorship W4220753255A5031809088 @default.
• W4220753255 hasAuthorship W4220753255A5054124464 @default.
• W4220753255 hasAuthorship W4220753255A5075825809 @default.
• W4220753255 hasBestOaLocation W42207532551 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConcept C9893847 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConceptScore W4220753255C105795698 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConceptScore W4220753255C33923547 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConceptScore W4220753255C41008148 @default.
• W4220753255 hasConceptScore W4220753255C9893847 @default.
• W4220753255 hasFunder F4320308269 @default.
• W4220753255 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4220753255 hasLocation W42207532551 @default.
• W4220753255 hasOpenAccess W4220753255 @default.
• W4220753255 hasPrimaryLocation W42207532551 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W1973270181 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2003643616 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2087830269 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2368782778 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2413717610 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2417696084 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W3106281778 @default.
• W4220753255 hasRelatedWork W638612878 @default.
• W4220753255 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W4220753255 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220753255 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220753255 workType "article" @default.