Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220794110> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 34 of
34
with 100 items per page.
- W4220794110 endingPage "133" @default.
- W4220794110 startingPage "83" @default.
- W4220794110 abstract "According to Section 142 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court closes the oral hearing when the matter has been fully discussed and it is ready for a decision. Nevertheless, there are cases in which, circumstances arise or become apparent that make the immediate termination of the proceedings seem inappropriate or even incorrect. In such cases, the court “may” reopen the hearing. The wording can just as well emphasize the power of the court to reopen the closed hearing ex officio. But there are some exceptional circumstances in which the court, without having any discretion, is obliged to open the proceedings to secure the fundamental right of the party. Korean Court developed the theory of analysis about the group of cases in which the court is obliged to reopen the case. The court ruled out the condition ① it should be against the procedural righteousness if the party is defeated without giving the chance of submission, ② the court has to heal the illegitimacy of judicial procedure by reopening the trial as the court has the duty to judge a case fairly and appropriately. To overcome the limit of judicial precedent, legislative adjustment is essential. And the suggest legislation is as follows, In particular, the court shall order the reopening when ① When a party applies for the resumption of pleading in order to be given an opportunity to submit new evidence that will affect the judgment, and demonstrates that it has failed to submit it before closing the pleadings due to reasons that are difficult to be held responsible for, ② facts are subsequently presented and made credible which form a reason for retrial, ③ In the event that the party did not have a proper opportunity to present the evidence before the conclusion of the pleadings due to circumstances in which it is difficult to hold the party responsible, and the object of the assertion or proof falls under the main evidence that can influence the outcome of the judgment." @default.
- W4220794110 created "2022-04-03" @default.
- W4220794110 creator A5051506670 @default.
- W4220794110 date "2022-02-28" @default.
- W4220794110 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
- W4220794110 title "변론재개의무에 관한 대법원 판례의 분석과 입법론" @default.
- W4220794110 doi "https://doi.org/10.30639/cp.2022.2.26.1.083" @default.
- W4220794110 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4220794110 type Work @default.
- W4220794110 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4220794110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4220794110 hasAuthorship W4220794110A5051506670 @default.
- W4220794110 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4220794110 hasConceptScore W4220794110C71924100 @default.
- W4220794110 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W4220794110 hasLocation W42207941101 @default.
- W4220794110 hasOpenAccess W4220794110 @default.
- W4220794110 hasPrimaryLocation W42207941101 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W11934184 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W12249330 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W13754765 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W15921328 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W23006619 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W23748621 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W24983819 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W368162 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W6897641 @default.
- W4220794110 hasRelatedWork W1720677 @default.
- W4220794110 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W4220794110 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4220794110 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4220794110 workType "article" @default.