FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220943944> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220943944 endingPage "934" @default.
• W4220943944 startingPage "928" @default.
• W4220943944 abstract "Various surgical specialties have reported gender bias in letters of recommendation (LOR). We aimed to determine if linguistic differences exist in LOR for female and male physicians applying to Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery (FMIGS).Retrospective cohort study including application cycles 2019 and 2020.Academic university hospital.FMIGS applicants.Applicant demographic and baseline data included age, race, gender, geographical region of residency training, Step 1 and 2 scores, number of research and volunteer activities, Alpha Omega Alpha and Gold Humanism status and number of LOR, as well as the gender and academic rank of the letter writer. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software, a validated text analysis program, was used to characterize LOR linguistic content. A total of 118 applications, including 391 letters, were analyzed. Seventy-six (64.4%) applicants were female and 42 (35.6%) were male. Most female applicants were white (46% vs. 36%, p = 0.04), had Alpha Omega Alpha status (13% vs. 0%, p = 0.01), higher Step 2 scores (239.7 vs. 230.4, p < 0.01), and more service activities (7.7 vs. 4.7, p < 0.01), compared to male applicants. Male applicants were more likely to graduate from international medical schools (45% vs. 16%, p < 0.01). Female authors wrote 159 LOR, and male authors wrote 232. Following multivariable analysis controlling for race, Step 1 score and letter writer gender, no significant differences in average LOR word count for female and male applicants (406.7 ± 24.2 words vs. 340.1 ± 35.4 words), or differences in Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count linguistic categories existed.Although Baseline differences were noted between female and male FMIGS applicants, no differences in LOR length or linguistic categories were noted. These results likely reflect the impact of female predominance and increased efforts to address gender bias within Obstetrics and Gynecology." @default.
• W4220943944 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5000041334 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5000142678 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5024951333 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5036056866 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5039955232 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5055259903 @default.
• W4220943944 creator A5085143234 @default.
• W4220943944 date "2022-07-01" @default.
• W4220943944 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W4220943944 title "Linguistic Differences by Gender in Letters of Recommendation for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Fellowship Applicants" @default.
• W4220943944 cites W1674016036 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W1992098338 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2025640120 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2043591062 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2094484776 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2102614574 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2127455621 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2134409731 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2335036046 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2341609091 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2742754534 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2749659761 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2793059526 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2892751725 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2909944322 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2971465862 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2972290368 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2979301888 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2982445545 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W2997917532 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W3126461062 @default.
• W4220943944 cites W3197250793 @default.
• W4220943944 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.02.007" @default.
• W4220943944 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35249843" @default.
• W4220943944 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220943944 type Work @default.
• W4220943944 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4220943944 countsByYear W42209439442023 @default.
• W4220943944 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5000041334 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5000142678 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5024951333 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5036056866 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5039955232 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5055259903 @default.
• W4220943944 hasAuthorship W4220943944A5085143234 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConceptScore W4220943944C144024400 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConceptScore W4220943944C149923435 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConceptScore W4220943944C512399662 @default.
• W4220943944 hasConceptScore W4220943944C71924100 @default.
• W4220943944 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4220943944 hasLocation W42209439441 @default.
• W4220943944 hasLocation W42209439442 @default.
• W4220943944 hasOpenAccess W4220943944 @default.
• W4220943944 hasPrimaryLocation W42209439441 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W4220943944 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W4220943944 hasVolume "79" @default.
• W4220943944 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220943944 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220943944 workType "article" @default.