FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220951400> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220951400 endingPage "146" @default.
• W4220951400 startingPage "111" @default.
• W4220951400 abstract "The disruptive development of digital technology and the rapid transition to a non-face-to-face economy caused by Corona Pandemic are accelerating the growth of online platforms. However, the market dominance of online platform companies leads to various unfair trade practices such as excessive fees, and the expansion into diverse business areas to build a platform ecosystem is considered to threaten the survival of small and medium-sized enterprises and small business owners. There are voices calling for regulating the abuse of market dominance and unfair trade practices of online platform companies in Korea as well as in Europe and the United States, and strong government-led regulations are under consideration. The enactment of the Online Platform Fairness Act and the revision of the Mutually Beneficial Cooperation Act, which are currently pending in the National Assembly, reflect this trend. However, government regulations have a problem that they cannot quickly reflect the rapidly changing market conditions. Not only is it difficult to clearly define the market, which is a prerequisite for regulation, and to verify the facts and effects of unfair trade practices, but it is also difficult to ignore the fact that online platforms contribute to the improvement of transaction efficiency and consumer welfare. Even if strong legal regulations can ensure fairness in transactions between online platform companies and their users, it is questionable whether this can resolve conflicts in a desirable direction and promote the collaboration among conflicting parties. The intrinsic nature of collaboration is the pursuit of diversity and harmony. A healthy and sustainable business ecosystem can be achieved by both large companies and SMEs collaborating to develop their own capabilities and build mutual trust. To this end, this study suggests the self-governance or self-regulation for online platform companies. In particular, it is believed that platform companies, based on the principle of ‘good faith’, should seek equity and fairness in their relations with users and quickly introduce in-house dispute mediation programs for resolving conflicts. Furthermore, beyond the collaboration with users or complementors, it is believed that platform companies should develop and practice social responsibility for the interests of society at large. More specifically, the suggestions of this study are as follows. First, based on the social interdependence theory and Deutsch’s theory of competition and cooperation, this study believes that the essence of collaborative (win-win) cooperation lies in harmony or balance between heterogeneous economic actors, and in order to achieve this in a conflict situation, it is necessary to seek cooperative-constructive conflict resolution rather than competitive-destructive conflict resolution. However, it is necessary to seek harmony between competition and cooperation in that it is possible to simultaneously pursue competition and cooperation, and fair competition or restrained competition can have positive results. Second, following Gorwa (2019)’s suggestion, this study also sees the appropriate balance between the self-governance, external governance, and co-governance as a good form of platform governance. In particular, as government authorities are strongly considering legal regulations, platforms are expected to strengthen self-regulation, establish an organization performing multiple functions ranging from investigating user complaints to creating ethical frameworks, seek user participation in policy decisions, and so on. Third, if a platform company wants to practice self-regulation, it must be made in the direction of complying with the ‘principle of good faith’ as in general transactions. The principle of good faith is closely related to the duty of cooperation, the doctrine of non-degradation from grant, and the principle of unconscionability. The core concepts that make up these principles include honesty, fairness, reasonableness, exclusion of bad faith and opportunism, compliance with fiduciary duty, respect of the other party’s rational expectations, and the implementation of community standards. Fourth, it is desirable to preemptively and quickly introduce an in-house dispute mediation program to resolve conflicts. Both the enactment of the Online Platform Fairness Act and the revision of the Mutually Beneficial Cooperation Act stipulate the operation of the public dispute mediation program as a means for resolving disputes between platforms and their users. In-house dispute mediation is a ‘low risk coordinative mechanism’ compared to public dispute mediation, which contributes to improving relations between disputing parties and enhances corporate reputation and image. In addition, it is a more efficient and flexible conflict resolution method in that new measures not recognized by the parties can be sought during the mediation process. Finally, platform companies’ collaboration efforts should be made in relation to consumers and society. The concept of collaborative cooperation requires platform companies to participate in solving social and environmental problems. It is necessary to consider how to impose responsibility on the platform and its various stakeholders to realize public values such as transparency and diversity." @default.
• W4220951400 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220951400 creator A5071186970 @default.
• W4220951400 creator A5088898615 @default.
• W4220951400 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4220951400 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4220951400 title "Promoting Collaboration between On-line Platforms and Users" @default.
• W4220951400 cites W1870049041 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2070710930 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2125761350 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2327944558 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2778635114 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2794077820 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2911280170 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2936414176 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2957717293 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2970940270 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W2971755832 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W3009236404 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W3123663573 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W3151933858 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W4205741883 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W4237176268 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W4240701943 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W4254155741 @default.
• W4220951400 cites W4376999564 @default.
• W4220951400 doi "https://doi.org/10.17657/jcr.2022.1.31.111" @default.
• W4220951400 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220951400 type Work @default.
• W4220951400 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4220951400 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220951400 hasAuthorship W4220951400A5071186970 @default.
• W4220951400 hasAuthorship W4220951400A5088898615 @default.
• W4220951400 hasBestOaLocation W42209514001 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C151913843 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C2776453491 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C2986873142 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C40700 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConcept C75949130 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C104317684 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C110875604 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C136764020 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C138885662 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C142362112 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C144133560 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C151913843 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C153349607 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C162853370 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C185592680 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C199360897 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C2776453491 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C2778137410 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C2986873142 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C40700 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C41008148 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C41895202 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C55493867 @default.
• W4220951400 hasConceptScore W4220951400C75949130 @default.
• W4220951400 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4220951400 hasLocation W42209514001 @default.
• W4220951400 hasOpenAccess W4220951400 @default.
• W4220951400 hasPrimaryLocation W42209514001 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W1569184592 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W1978505276 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W1988022704 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W2010805752 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W2069174797 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W2136710333 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W2187644337 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W2353769157 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W3132716659 @default.
• W4220951400 hasRelatedWork W4206036160 @default.
• W4220951400 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W4220951400 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220951400 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220951400 workType "article" @default.