FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220971107> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220971107 endingPage "821" @default.
• W4220971107 startingPage "808" @default.
• W4220971107 abstract "The increasing need for speech therapy due to our ageing population raises the demand on therapeutical resources. To meet this demand, innovative delivery of speech training is required. eHealth applications may provide a solution, as intensified and prolonged training is only possible and affordable in patients' home environment.This study explores the effects on speech intelligibility of game-based speech training that provides automatic feedback on loudness, pitch and pronunciation. Additionally, we investigate how satisfied patients are with the game-based speech training and how they experience the automatic feedback. Furthermore, patients' preferences for game-based speech training compared with face-to-face training are explored.Eight adult dysarthric speakers with Parkinson's disease (PD) completed a 4-week game-based speech training in their home environment. For each speaker, 24 speech utterances were audio recorded 4 weeks before (T1), immediately before (T2) and immediately after (T3) the training. All speech samples were rated on speech intelligibility by 10 untrained listeners, by comparing them with the corresponding utterances realized by a healthy speaker. Changes over time were analysed using a linear mixed-effects analysis. Patient satisfaction with the game and the automatic feedback was assessed using a questionnaire. The preferences of patients were collected using a paired comparisons procedure in which the patients were asked whether they would prefer game-based or face-to-face speech training in four hypothetical scenarios with different hypothesized levels of speech improvement.While there was no significant difference in speech intelligibility ratings between T1 and T2, we did find one between T2 and T3. At T3, speech intelligibility was rated higher than at T2, indicating positive effects of the game-based speech training. Patients generally seemed satisfied with the game as average ratings were above 7 on a 10-point rating scale. Generally, patients agreed with the automatic feedback and could use it to positively change the way they spoke. Patients prefer the training that provides the highest hypothetical improvement, and thus do not prefer face-to-face above game-based therapy.The results of this study suggest that dysarthric speakers due to PD see game-based speech therapy as a valid alternative for face-to-face therapy and that it leads to an average improvement in speech intelligibility. For an optimal effect and user satisfaction it should preferably not be used in isolation but in combination with face-to-face training. In this manner, the strengths of both therapeutic deliveries can be harnessed.What is already known on this subject Dysarthric speech in patients with PD is known to benefit from intensified and long-term speech therapy. The increasing need for speech therapy due to our ageing population raises the demand on therapeutical resources making highly frequent and long-term therapy difficult. eHealth provides the opportunity to intensify and prolong speech training in patients' home environment. A drill-and-practice method was employed and investigated in a web-based speech application, indicating positive effects on speech intelligibility. However, participants indicated a lack of variation in exercises making the training less enjoyable. Other research showed that serious games can increase enjoyment during training. What this paper adds to existing knowledge The results of this study show that it is possible to develop a serious game that can be successfully used for speech training by patients with dysarthria due to PD. Comparing speech intelligibility ratings before and after training, we observed significant improvements in speech intelligibility ratings. Patients generally agree with the automatic feedback and can use it to positively change the way they speak. Average ratings were above 7 on a 10-point scale, indicating that patients are satisfied with the game. Patients prefer the type of training (game based or face to face) that provides the highest hypothetical improvement. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The results of this study suggest that game-based speech training can improve speech intelligibility in patients. This indicates that it can be considered a suitable approach in the treatment of patients with dysarthria due to PD. Patients do not prefer game-based training above face-to-face training in all scenarios. For that reason, for every patient one should carefully consider how to optimally combine game-based and face-to-face training." @default.
• W4220971107 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220971107 creator A5015731524 @default.
• W4220971107 creator A5016396474 @default.
• W4220971107 creator A5019585114 @default.
• W4220971107 creator A5076006134 @default.
• W4220971107 creator A5076015256 @default.
• W4220971107 date "2022-03-26" @default.
• W4220971107 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4220971107 title "A serious game for speech training in dysarthric speakers with Parkinson's disease: Exploring therapeutic efficacy and patient satisfaction" @default.
• W4220971107 cites W1557807843 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W1900154594 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W1951724000 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W1964868373 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2000565252 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2003569243 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2022625505 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2065097374 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2065840343 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2071650246 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2127678189 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2170234362 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2278135413 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2558509371 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2563389300 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2886528649 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2887514679 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W2945531494 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W3124244217 @default.
• W4220971107 cites W4220971107 @default.
• W4220971107 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12722" @default.
• W4220971107 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35338751" @default.
• W4220971107 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220971107 type Work @default.
• W4220971107 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W4220971107 countsByYear W42209711072022 @default.
• W4220971107 countsByYear W42209711072023 @default.
• W4220971107 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220971107 hasAuthorship W4220971107A5015731524 @default.
• W4220971107 hasAuthorship W4220971107A5016396474 @default.
• W4220971107 hasAuthorship W4220971107A5019585114 @default.
• W4220971107 hasAuthorship W4220971107A5076006134 @default.
• W4220971107 hasAuthorship W4220971107A5076015256 @default.
• W4220971107 hasBestOaLocation W42209711071 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C2777639682 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C2780844864 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C60048801 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C111472728 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C138885662 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C15744967 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C177291462 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C2777639682 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C2780844864 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C28490314 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C41008148 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C41895202 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C46312422 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C548259974 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C60048801 @default.
• W4220971107 hasConceptScore W4220971107C71924100 @default.
• W4220971107 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4220971107 hasLocation W42209711071 @default.
• W4220971107 hasLocation W42209711072 @default.
• W4220971107 hasLocation W42209711073 @default.
• W4220971107 hasLocation W42209711074 @default.
• W4220971107 hasOpenAccess W4220971107 @default.
• W4220971107 hasPrimaryLocation W42209711071 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2040430493 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2069324367 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2110407872 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2508408760 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2781699696 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W2999996462 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W3012461590 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W3163725792 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W4224931267 @default.
• W4220971107 hasRelatedWork W4378191934 @default.
• W4220971107 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W4220971107 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220971107 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220971107 workType "article" @default.