FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4220996891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4220996891 abstract "The trueness of the intaglio surface of an additively manufactured maxillary denture base may be influenced by the build orientation and the inclusion of support struts.The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness of a photopolymer additively manufactured maxillary complete denture base created at different orientations with different support strut designs. Optimizing the build is critical for adopting best practice when fabricating maxillary complete dentures through additive manufacturing techniques.Denture bases (N=70) were additively manufactured at 5 different build orientations (0-, 15-, 45-, 60-, and 90-degrees) with 10 specimens per orientation. Another 2 groups of 10 were manufactured by using the optimal printing orientation with and without support struts. The denture bases were scanned after storage in artificial saliva at 37 °C, and the scan data were analyzed with a 3D metrology software program. Statistical differences were determined with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=.05). Color deviation heat maps were used to determine areas of clinically significant dimensional errors.Significant differences were found among groups for positive mean deviation (F=44.09, P<.001), negative mean deviation (F=11.69, P<.001), and root mean square deviation (F=17.11, P<.001) for the different orientations. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences with the use of support struts in relation to negative mean deviation (F=3.857, P<.001) and RMSE (F=11.215, P<.001) and positive mean deviation (Kruskal-Wallis H=0.070, P=.007). The color deviation maps showed that a 45- to 90-degree print orientation was truest overall and that the addition of support struts to the cameo and intaglio surfaces improved the trueness of the maxillary denture bases.The build orientation and inclusion of support struts influenced the accuracy of the intaglio surface of additively manufactured maxillary denture bases. A 45- to 90-degree build orientation with support struts on the cameo and intaglio surfaces resulted in the truest denture base." @default.
• W4220996891 created "2022-04-03" @default.
• W4220996891 creator A5010594452 @default.
• W4220996891 creator A5036631627 @default.
• W4220996891 creator A5064426554 @default.
• W4220996891 creator A5079520782 @default.
• W4220996891 creator A5081275488 @default.
• W4220996891 date "2022-03-01" @default.
• W4220996891 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4220996891 title "Trueness assessment of additively manufactured maxillary complete denture bases produced at different orientations" @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2069679336 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2070038582 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2087484885 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2519389717 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2553866699 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2918476203 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W2953299883 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W3008298947 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W3046314431 @default.
• W4220996891 cites W3081302537 @default.
• W4220996891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.025" @default.
• W4220996891 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35260254" @default.
• W4220996891 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4220996891 type Work @default.
• W4220996891 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W4220996891 countsByYear W42209968912023 @default.
• W4220996891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4220996891 hasAuthorship W4220996891A5010594452 @default.
• W4220996891 hasAuthorship W4220996891A5036631627 @default.
• W4220996891 hasAuthorship W4220996891A5064426554 @default.
• W4220996891 hasAuthorship W4220996891A5079520782 @default.
• W4220996891 hasAuthorship W4220996891A5081275488 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C120934525 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C2780062004 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C2986587452 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C42058472 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C105795698 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C120934525 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C134306372 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C192562407 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C199343813 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C22679943 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C2780062004 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C29694066 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C2986587452 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C33923547 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C42058472 @default.
• W4220996891 hasConceptScore W4220996891C71924100 @default.
• W4220996891 hasLocation W42209968911 @default.
• W4220996891 hasLocation W42209968912 @default.
• W4220996891 hasOpenAccess W4220996891 @default.
• W4220996891 hasPrimaryLocation W42209968911 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W1612761198 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W172914627 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W2087339161 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W2348965746 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W2369460414 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W2378708604 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W2742061534 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W3091994150 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W4290703339 @default.
• W4220996891 hasRelatedWork W1755364623 @default.
• W4220996891 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4220996891 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4220996891 workType "article" @default.