FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4223982484> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4223982484 endingPage "722" @default.
• W4223982484 startingPage "720" @default.
• W4223982484 abstract "Health Services ResearchVolume 57, Issue 4 p. 720-722 COMMENTARY A broader defense of the value of direct care in the Military Health System Gregg S. Meyer MD, MSc, Corresponding Author Gregg S. Meyer MD, MSc [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-2100 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Correspondence Gregg S. Meyer, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1150, Boston, MA 02199, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Gregg S. Meyer MD, MSc, Corresponding Author Gregg S. Meyer MD, MSc [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-2100 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Correspondence Gregg S. Meyer, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Mass General Brigham, 800 Boylston Street, Suite 1150, Boston, MA 02199, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 17 April 2022 https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13989Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1Anhang Price R, Sloss EM, Cefalu M, Farmer CM, Hussey PS. Comparing quality of care in Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2018; 33(10): 1631- 1638. 2Sequist TD, Cullen T, Bernard K, Shaykevich S, Orav EJ, Ayanian JZ. Trends in quality of care and barriers to improvement in the Indian Health Service. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26(5): 480- 486. doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1594-4 3Koehlmoos TP, Madsen CK, Banaag A, Haider AH, Schoenfeld AJ, Weissman JS. Assessing low-value health care services in the Military Health System. Health Aff. 2019; 38(8): 1351- 1357. 4Zogg CK, Lichtman JH, Dalton MK, et al. In defense of direct care: limiting access to military hospitals could worsen quality and safety. Health Serv Res. 2022; 57(4): 723- 733. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.13885 5 Guide to Inpatient Quality Indicators. https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Downloads/Modules/IQI/V21/iqi_guide_rev4.pdf 6 Introduction to the HCUP nationwide readmissions database (NRD) 2010-2017. https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/Introduction_NRD_2010-2017.pdf 7Jackson JL, Strong J, Cheng EY, Meyer G. Patients, diagnoses, and procedures in a military internal medicine clinic: comparison with civilian practices. Mil Med. 1999; 164(3): 194- 197. 8Madenci AL, Madsen CK, Kwon NK, et al. Comparison of Military Health System data repository and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality improvement program-pediatric. BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1): 419. 9Eaglehouse YL, Manjelievskaia J, Shao S, et al. Costs for breast cancer care in the Military Health System: an analysis by benefit type and care source. Mil Med. 2018; 183(11–12): e500- e508. 10Kellerman AL. Rethinking the United States' Military Health System. Health Affairs Forefront. 10.1377/forefront.20170427.059833/ 11 Institute of Medicine. Leadership by Example: Coordinating Government Roles in Improving Health Care Quality. The National Academies Press; 2003. doi:10.17226/10537 12Young GJ, Charns MP, Barbour GL. Quality improvement in the US veterans health administration. Int J Qual Health Care. 1997; 9(3): 183- 188. 13Kizer KW, Demakis JG, Feussner JR. Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care. 2000; 38(6 Suppl 1): I7- I16. 14Krakauer H, Lin MJ, Schone EM, et al. ‘Best clinical practice’: assessment of processes of care and of outcomes in the US military health services system. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998; 4(1): 11- 29. 15Taylor AJ, Meyer GS, Morse RW, Pearson CE. Can characteristics of a health care system mitigate ethnic bias in access to cardiovascular procedures? Experience from the military health services system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997; 30(4): 901- 907. 16Howard JT, Kotwal RS, Stern CA, et al. Use of combat casualty care data to assess the US military trauma system during the Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts, 2001-2017. JAMA Surg. 2019; 154(7): 600- 608. Volume57, Issue4August 2022Pages 720-722 ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W4223982484 created "2022-04-19" @default.
• W4223982484 creator A5028309092 @default.
• W4223982484 date "2022-04-30" @default.
• W4223982484 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4223982484 title "A broader defense of the value of direct care in the Military Health System" @default.
• W4223982484 cites W1966343556 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2027540972 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2065215163 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W207442414 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2119588130 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2335093665 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2797944286 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2801711810 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2925152413 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2966103028 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W2986193402 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W3204903483 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W4223982484 @default.
• W4223982484 cites W4240350326 @default.
• W4223982484 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13989" @default.
• W4223982484 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35434788" @default.
• W4223982484 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4223982484 type Work @default.
• W4223982484 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4223982484 countsByYear W42239824842022 @default.
• W4223982484 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4223982484 hasAuthorship W4223982484A5028309092 @default.
• W4223982484 hasBestOaLocation W42239824842 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C2992019943 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C2993838110 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C161191863 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C2778805511 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C2992019943 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C2993838110 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C41008148 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C509550671 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C512399662 @default.
• W4223982484 hasConceptScore W4223982484C71924100 @default.
• W4223982484 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4223982484 hasLocation W42239824841 @default.
• W4223982484 hasLocation W42239824842 @default.
• W4223982484 hasLocation W42239824843 @default.
• W4223982484 hasOpenAccess W4223982484 @default.
• W4223982484 hasPrimaryLocation W42239824841 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W2051499151 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W2322382814 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W2386949708 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W2604677716 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W2773462615 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W4200268201 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W4231226515 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W4232745934 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W4254993461 @default.
• W4223982484 hasRelatedWork W206452685 @default.
• W4223982484 hasVolume "57" @default.
• W4223982484 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4223982484 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4223982484 workType "article" @default.