FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225125092> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225125092 abstract "The paramount issue regarding multiple lung cancer (MLC) is whether it represents multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) or intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), as this directly affects both accurate staging and subsequent clinical management. As a classic method, histology has been widely utilized in clinical practice. However, studies examining the clinical value of histology in MLC have yielded inconsistent results; thus, this remains to be evaluated. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the differential diagnostic value of histology in MPLC and IPM and to provide evidence-based medicine for clinical work.PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to collect relevant literature according to PRISMA, and inclusion and exclusion criteria were set up to screen and assess the literature. The data required for reconstructing a 2 × 2 contingency table were extracted directly or calculated indirectly from the included studies, and statistical analysis was carried out by using Stata 15, Meta-DiSc 1.4, and Review Manager 5.4 software.A total of 34 studies including 1,075 pairs of tumors were included in this meta-analysis. Among these studies, 11 were about the M-M standard and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71-0.84) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.38-0.55), respectively; 20 studies were about CHA and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.80) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79), respectively; and 3 studies were about the CHA & Lepidic criteria and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.21-0.73), respectively. The combined pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and the area under the SROC curve of the 34 studies were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73-0.86), 0.64 (95% CI: 0.51-0.76), 2.25 (95% CI: 1.59-3.17), 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23-0.43), 7.22 (95% CI: 4.06-12.81), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84), respectively.The current evidence indicated that histology had a moderate differential diagnostic value between MPLC and IPM. Among the three subgroups, the CHA & Lepidic criteria showed the highest sensitivity and CHA showed the highest specificity. Further research is necessary to validate these findings and to improve clinical credibility.PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022298180." @default.
• W4225125092 created "2022-05-01" @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5024702393 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5032177323 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5041081630 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5060996227 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5074483257 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5082492056 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5085905616 @default.
• W4225125092 creator A5078150824 @default.
• W4225125092 date "2022-04-29" @default.
• W4225125092 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W4225125092 title "Differential Diagnostic Value of Histology in MPLC and IPM: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1158033259 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1967046314 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1973469228 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1977920312 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1980610830 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W1990748933 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2017787556 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2057094936 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2063759711 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2073917035 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2083582596 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2085712746 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2092926517 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2106117130 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2124824275 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2134532746 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2150213931 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2169160087 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2288438952 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2337783964 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2403747135 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2481351987 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2591772374 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2603411876 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2702319702 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2750741316 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2796285985 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2810156769 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2890680673 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2912588451 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2945791404 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2971849142 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2980538260 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2981827671 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2994910386 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W2997687606 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W3008002409 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W3041485143 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W3131354339 @default.
• W4225125092 cites W3165786205 @default.
• W4225125092 doi "https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.871827" @default.
• W4225125092 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35574321" @default.
• W4225125092 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4225125092 type Work @default.
• W4225125092 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4225125092 countsByYear W42251250922023 @default.
• W4225125092 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5024702393 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5032177323 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5041081630 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5060996227 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5074483257 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5078150824 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5082492056 @default.
• W4225125092 hasAuthorship W4225125092A5085905616 @default.
• W4225125092 hasBestOaLocation W42251250921 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C2776256026 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C57742111 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C91998498 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C105795698 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C126322002 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C142724271 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C189708586 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C204787440 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C2776256026 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C2777596629 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C2779473830 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C33923547 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C55493867 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C57742111 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C71924100 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C86803240 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C91998498 @default.
• W4225125092 hasConceptScore W4225125092C95190672 @default.

• next