FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225281612> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225281612 abstract "This systematic review was designed to assess the usefulness of cough peak flow to predict the extubation outcome in subjects who passed a spontaneous breathing trial.The search covered the scientific databases MEDLINE, Lilacs, Ibecs, Cinahl, SciELO, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science and gray literature. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies was used to assess the methodological quality and risk of study bias. The statistical heterogeneity of the likelihood (LR) and diagnostic odds ratios were evaluated using forest plots and Cochran's Q statistic, and a crosshair summary Receiver Operating Characteristic plot using the multiple cutoffs model was calculated.We initially retrieved 3,522 references from the databases; among these, 12 studies including 1,757 subjects were selected for the qualitative analysis. Many studies presented an unclear risk of bias in the patient selection and flow and time criteria. Among the 12 included studies, seven presented high risk and five unclear risk for the item reference standard. The diagnostic performance of the cough peak flow for the extubation outcome was low to moderate when we considered the results from all included studies, with a +LR of 1.360 (95%CI 1.240 - 1.530), -LR of 0.218 (95%CI 0.159 - 0.293) and a diagnostic odds ratio of 6.450 (95%CI 4.490 - 9.090). A subgroup analysis including only the studies with a cutoff between 55 and 65 L/minute showed a slightly better, although still moderate, performance.A cough peak flow assessment considering a cutoff between 55 and 65L/minute may be useful as a complementary measurement prior to extubation. Additional well-designed studies are necessary to identify the best method and equipment to record the cough peak flow as well as the best cutoff.Avaliar a utilidade do pico de fluxo da tosse para predizer o desfecho da extubação em pacientes que obtiveram sucesso no teste de respiração espontânea.A busca cobriu as bases de dados científicos MEDLINE, Lilacs, Ibecs, Cinahl, SciELO, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science e literatura cinzenta. Utilizaram-se os critérios Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies para avaliar a qualidade da metodologia e o risco de viés dos estudos. A heterogeneidade estatística da razão de verossimilhança (LR) e razão de chance diagnóstica (RCD) do diagnóstico foram avaliadas com utilização de gráficos em floresta, teste Q de Cochran e um gráfico crosshair summary Receiver Operating Characteristic, utilizando um modelo com múltiplos pontos de corte.Inicialmente obteve-se, nas bases de dados, um total de 3.522 referências; dentre estas, selecionaram-se para análise qualitativa 12 estudos que incluíram 1.757 participantes. Muitos estudos apresentavam um risco de viés incerto em termos da seleção de pacientes e do fluxo e tempo. Dentre os 12 estudos incluídos, sete tinham alto risco e cinco risco incerto para o item padrão de referência. O desempenho diagnóstico do pico de fluxo da tosse para o resultado da extubação foi baixo a moderado quando se consideram os resultados de todos os estudos incluídos, com +LR de 1,360 (IC95% 1,240 - 1,530), -LR de 0,218 (IC95% 0,159 - 0,293) e razão de chance diagnóstica de 6,450 (IC95% 4,490 - 9,090). Uma análise de subgrupos que incluiu somente estudos com valores de corte entre 55 e 65 L/minuto demonstrou desempenho ligeiramente melhor, porém ainda moderado.A avaliação do pico de fluxo da tosse, considerando valor de corte entre 55 e 65 L/minuto, pode ser útil como medida complementar antes da extubação. São necessários estudos com melhor delineamento para elucidar o melhor método e equipamento para registrar o pico de fluxo da tosse, assim como o melhor ponto de corte." @default.
• W4225281612 created "2022-05-04" @default.
• W4225281612 creator A5034465091 @default.
• W4225281612 creator A5045355961 @default.
• W4225281612 creator A5067228181 @default.
• W4225281612 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W4225281612 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4225281612 title "Cough peak flow to predict extubation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1635830636 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W181321772 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1957482662 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1959961104 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1968742227 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1978423883 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W1985533748 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2005501262 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2005694538 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2006415152 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2020488794 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2031466412 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2051063287 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2067845874 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2070552729 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2087665137 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2089543004 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2089574421 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2099177143 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2118175714 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2125435699 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2127103549 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2129907885 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2137035805 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2140066904 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2142104245 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2144078503 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2155110583 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2157684778 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2313915883 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2325962838 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2344614556 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2512059932 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2527904082 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2593023188 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2620570178 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2620771852 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2622086308 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2756363800 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2901641671 @default.
• W4225281612 cites W2937437085 @default.
• W4225281612 doi "https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507x.20210060" @default.
• W4225281612 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35107557" @default.
• W4225281612 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4225281612 type Work @default.
• W4225281612 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W4225281612 countsByYear W42252816122021 @default.
• W4225281612 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225281612 hasAuthorship W4225281612A5034465091 @default.
• W4225281612 hasAuthorship W4225281612A5045355961 @default.
• W4225281612 hasAuthorship W4225281612A5067228181 @default.
• W4225281612 hasBestOaLocation W42252816121 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C119423318 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C157481446 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C187960798 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C194661718 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C2778217198 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C2780439572 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C82605166 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C89128539 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C105795698 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C118552586 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C119423318 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C121332964 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C126322002 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C156957248 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C157481446 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C17744445 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C187960798 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C189708586 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C194661718 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C199539241 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C27415008 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C2778217198 @default.
• W4225281612 hasConceptScore W4225281612C2779473830 @default.

• next