FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225514469> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225514469 endingPage "116" @default.
• W4225514469 startingPage "108" @default.
• W4225514469 abstract "BACKGROUND: Fecal management systems have become ubiquitous in hospitalized patients with fecal incontinence or severe diarrhea, especially in the setting of perianal wounds. Although fecal management system use has been shown to be safe and effective in initial series, case reports of rectal ulceration and severe bleeding have been reported, with a relative paucity of clinical safety data in the literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of rectal complications attributable to fecal management systems, as well as to characterize possible risk factors and appropriate management strategies for such complications. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: All medical and surgical patients who underwent fecal management system placement from December 2014 to March 2017 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured any rectal complication associated with fecal management system use, defined as any rectal injury identified after fecal management system use confirmed by lower endoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 629 patients were captured, with a median duration of fecal management system use of 4 days. Overall, 8 patients (1.3%) experienced a rectal injury associated with fecal management system use. All of the patients who experienced a rectal complication had severe underlying comorbidities, including 2 patients on dialysis, 1 patient with cirrhosis, and 3 patients with a recent history of emergent cardiac surgery. In 3 patients the bleeding resolved spontaneously, whereas the remaining 5 patients required intervention: transanal suture ligation (n = 2), endoscopic clip placement (n = 1), rectal packing (n = 1), and proctectomy in 1 patient with a history of pelvic radiotherapy. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design and single institution. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study to date evaluating rectal complications from fecal management system use. Although rectal injury rates are low, they can lead to serious morbidity. Advanced age, severe comorbidities, pelvic radiotherapy, and anticoagulation status or coagulopathy are important factors to consider before fecal management system placement. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B698. INCIDENCIA Y CARACTERIZACIÓN DE LAS COMPLICACIONES RECTALES DE LOS SISTEMAS DE MANEJO FECAL ANTECEDENTES: Los sistemas de manejo fecal se han vuelto omnipresentes en pacientes hospitalizados con incontinencia fecal o diarrea severa, especialmente en el contexto de heridas perianales. Aunque se ha demostrado que el uso del sistema de tratamiento fecal es seguro y eficaz en la serie inicial, se han notificado casos de ulceración rectal y hemorragia grave, con una relativa escasez de datos de seguridad clínica en la literatura. OBJETIVO: Determinar la tasa de complicaciones rectales atribuibles a los sistemas de manejo fecal. Caracterizar los posibles factores de riesgo y las estrategias de manejo adecuadas para tales complicaciones. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo. ENTORNO CLINICO: Centro médico académico de mayor volumen. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes médicos y quirúrgicos que se sometieron a la colocación del sistema de manejo fecal desde diciembre de 2014 hasta marzo de 2017. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION: Cualquier complicación rectal asociada con el uso del sistema de manejo fecal, definida como cualquier lesión rectal identificada después del uso del sistema de manejo fecal confirmada por endoscopia baja. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron un total de 629 pacientes, con una duración media del uso del sistema de manejo fecal de 4,0 días. En general, 8 (1,3%) pacientes desarrollaron una lesión rectal asociada con el uso del sistema de manejo fecal. Todos los pacientes que mostraron una complicación rectal tenían comorbilidades subyacentes graves, incluidos dos pacientes en diálisis, un paciente con cirrosis y tres pacientes con antecedentes recientes de cirugía cardíaca emergente. En tres pacientes el sangrado se resolvió espontáneamente, mientras que los cinco pacientes restantes requirieron intervención: ligadura de sutura transanal (2), colocación de clip endoscópico (1), taponamiento rectal (1) y proctectomía en un paciente con antecedentes de radioterapia pélvica. LIMITACIONES: Diseño retrospectivo, institución única. CONCLUSIONES: Este es el estudio más grande hasta la fecha que evalúa las complicaciones rectales del uso del sistema de manejo fecal. Si bien las tasas de lesión rectal son bajas, pueden provocar una morbilidad grave. La edad avanzada, las comorbilidades graves, la radioterapia pélvica y el estado de anticoagulación o coagulopatía son factores importantes a considerar antes de la colocación del sistema de manejo fecal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B698." @default.
• W4225514469 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5011563566 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5017886419 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5024054365 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5027582983 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5052589390 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5063424724 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5071712203 @default.
• W4225514469 creator A5086673122 @default.
• W4225514469 date "2021-09-16" @default.
• W4225514469 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4225514469 title "Incidence and Characterization of Rectal Complications From Fecal Management Systems" @default.
• W4225514469 cites W176532522 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W1942235025 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W1965484982 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W1971573306 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W1974389490 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W1979108212 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2003590330 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2025890193 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2042354556 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2042972251 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2069270091 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2071605964 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2073484851 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2086965287 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2092993175 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2110372756 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2122151108 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2141582069 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2149666565 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2152101959 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2156277779 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2234657698 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2329882205 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2335765273 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W2412758671 @default.
• W4225514469 cites W86009338 @default.
• W4225514469 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000002013" @default.
• W4225514469 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34538832" @default.
• W4225514469 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W4225514469 type Work @default.
• W4225514469 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4225514469 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5011563566 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5017886419 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5024054365 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5027582983 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5052589390 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5063424724 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5071712203 @default.
• W4225514469 hasAuthorship W4225514469A5086673122 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C2776813522 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C2777388843 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C2780120127 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C2781112942 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C523026621 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C61511704 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConcept C81182388 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C120665830 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C121332964 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C141071460 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C167135981 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C2776813522 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C2777388843 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C2780120127 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C2781112942 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C523026621 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C61434518 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C61511704 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C71924100 @default.
• W4225514469 hasConceptScore W4225514469C81182388 @default.
• W4225514469 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4225514469 hasLocation W42255144691 @default.
• W4225514469 hasLocation W42255144692 @default.
• W4225514469 hasOpenAccess W4225514469 @default.
• W4225514469 hasPrimaryLocation W42255144691 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2105473611 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2369768841 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2419427347 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W92475685 @default.
• W4225514469 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W4225514469 hasVolume "65" @default.
• W4225514469 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4225514469 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4225514469 workType "article" @default.