FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225515422> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225515422 endingPage "e35244" @default.
• W4225515422 startingPage "e35244" @default.
• W4225515422 abstract "Individuals' social networks and social support are fundamental determinants of self-management and self-efficacy. In chronic respiratory conditions, social support can be promoted and optimized to facilitate the self-management of breathlessness.This study aimed to identify how online and offline social networks play a role in the health management of older patients with chronic respiratory conditions, explore the role of support from online peers in patients' self-management, and understand the barriers to and potential benefits of digital social interventions.We recruited participants from a hospital-run singing group to a workshop in London, the United Kingdom, and adapted PERSNET, a quantitative social network assessment tool. The second workshop was replaced by telephone interviews because of the COVID-19 lockdown. The transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.A total of 7 participants (2/7, 29%, men and 5/7, 71%, women), with an age range of 64 to 81 years, produced network maps that comprised between 5 and 10 individuals, including family members, health care professionals, colleagues, activity groups, offline and online friends, and peers. The visual maps facilitated reflections and enhanced participants' understanding of the role of offline and online social networks in the management of chronic respiratory conditions. It also highlighted the work undertaken by the networks themselves in the self-management support. Participants with small, close-knit networks received physical, health, and emotional support, whereas those with more diverse and large networks benefited from accessing alternative and complementary sources of information. Participants in the latter type of network tended to communicate more openly and comfortably about their illness, shared the impact of their illness on their day-to-day life, and demonstrated distinct traits in terms of identity and perception of chronic disease. Participants described the potential benefits of expanding their networks to include online peers as sources of novel information, motivation, and access to supportive environments. Lack of technological skills, fear of being scammed, or preference for keeping illness-related problems for themselves and immediate family were reported by some as barriers to engaging with online peer support.In this small-scale study, the social network assessment tool proved feasible and acceptable. These data show the value of using a social network tool as a research tool that can help assess and understand network structure and engagement in the self-management support and could be developed into an intervention to support self-management. Patients' preferences to share illness experiences with their online peers, as well as the contexts in which this can be acceptable, should be considered when developing and offering digital social interventions. Future studies can explore the evolution of the social networks of older people with chronic illnesses to understand whether their willingness to engage with online peers can change over time." @default.
• W4225515422 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5033424239 @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5044153684 @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5044590438 @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5070158322 @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5079142239 @default.
• W4225515422 creator A5091770864 @default.
• W4225515422 date "2022-05-17" @default.
• W4225515422 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W4225515422 title "Understanding Online and Offline Social Networks in Illness Management of Older Patients With Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study Using Quantitative Social Network Assessment and Qualitative Analysis" @default.
• W4225515422 cites W1973272516 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W1977002863 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W1979290264 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W1980355136 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W1984926150 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2003490123 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2005078721 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2012910682 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2034232242 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2063970071 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2067508696 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2071538827 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W208298335 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2102881106 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2104545849 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2109469951 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2110161496 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2111896942 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2114895525 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2118745042 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2123743870 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2124647361 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2125269912 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2128000797 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2130363090 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2134049139 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2135867483 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2141808543 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2143072217 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2157928193 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2159877018 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2165243546 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2167988740 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2288214779 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2291215413 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2316777513 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2416342842 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2789634253 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2793862064 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2891628460 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2895986018 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2953424992 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2981269397 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W2991453787 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3012387951 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3014939058 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3033333111 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3052463901 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3121124538 @default.
• W4225515422 cites W3165187742 @default.
• W4225515422 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/35244" @default.
• W4225515422 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35579933" @default.
• W4225515422 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4225515422 type Work @default.
• W4225515422 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W4225515422 countsByYear W42255154222022 @default.
• W4225515422 countsByYear W42255154222023 @default.
• W4225515422 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5033424239 @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5044153684 @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5044590438 @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5070158322 @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5079142239 @default.
• W4225515422 hasAuthorship W4225515422A5091770864 @default.
• W4225515422 hasBestOaLocation W42255154221 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C114713312 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C2776933761 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C2778087770 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C4727928 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConceptScore W4225515422C114713312 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConceptScore W4225515422C119857082 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConceptScore W4225515422C136764020 @default.
• W4225515422 hasConceptScore W4225515422C144024400 @default.

• next