Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225533143> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4225533143 endingPage "664" @default.
- W4225533143 startingPage "646" @default.
- W4225533143 abstract "<p id=p00005>Extant emotional intelligence (EI) research has documented its <italic>intrapersonal</italic> benefits and has begun to examine its <italic>interpersonal</italic> effects. However, this line of research has primarily focused on the interpersonal effects of EI in the work context, while ignoring the potential influences from non-work domain. Considering employees’ family may have a spillover effect on their work behaviors, in this research, we propose that spouse EI will affect employees’ work engagement. Specifically, integrating effort-recovery model with the EI literature, we argue that spouse EI exerts a positive impact on employee work engagement through improving employees’ life well-being. Furthermore, we argue that employee gender alters the aboved relationships such that the positive interpersonal influences of spouse EI will be stronger among male employees than among female employees. <break/>We conducted two studies to examine the hypothesized model. In Study 1, we collected two-wave survey data from a large bank. At time 1, 126 employees and their spouses rated their own EI and provided their demographic information. At time 2, two weeks later, 126 employees evaluated their own life well-being and work engagement. The final valid sample consisted of 124 employee-spouse dyads. In Study 2, we collected three-wave survey data from an internet company. At time 1, 80 employees assessed their own EI and some control variables (i.e., leader EI, coworker EI, job demands, and job control); and their 80 spouses evaluated their own EI and provided their demographic information. At time 2, one month later, 78 employees rated their own life well-being. At time 3, another month later, 73 employees rated their own work engagement. The HR department of the company provided the archival data of employees’ demographic information. The final valid sample included 73 employee-spouse dyads. Regression analysis and bootstrapping technique were used to test the mediation, moderation, and moderated-mediation effects. <break/>In line with the hypotheses, two studies consistently showed that: (1) Spouse EI was positively related to employee life well-being; (2) Employee life well-being was positively related to employee work engagement; (3) Employee life well-being served as a mediator to transmit the effect of spouse EI on employee work engagement; (4) Employee gender moderated the relationship between spouse EI and employee life well-being such that when employees were male, the positive effect of spouse EI on employee life well-being was stronger; (5) Employee gender also moderated the indirect effect of spouse EI on employee work engagement via employee life well-being such that the indirect effect was stronger among male employees than among female employees. <break/>Our theoretical contributions are threefold. First, our research has deepened our understanding on EI, as it is among the first to establish a link between spouse EI and employee work engagement and supports the interpersonal effects of EI from the family to the work domain. Second, our research identifies employee life well-being as a key mediator that explains <italic>how</italic> spouse EI affects employee work engagement. Third, our research highlights the role of employee gender and unravels the conditions under which spouse EI exerts more or less effects on employee work engagement. Practically, our research offers implications to improve employee life well-being and work engagement through improving spouse EI, especially wife EI." @default.
- W4225533143 created "2022-05-05" @default.
- W4225533143 creator A5020217900 @default.
- W4225533143 creator A5040425987 @default.
- W4225533143 creator A5046897694 @default.
- W4225533143 date "2022-06-01" @default.
- W4225533143 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W4225533143 title "The effect of spouse emotional intelligence on employee work engagement: The mediating role of employee life well-being and the moderating role of gender" @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1503077506 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1752284228 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1782692364 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1782933591 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1863216925 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1902610065 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1964908808 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1966893617 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1978905808 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1980202090 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1982135085 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W1984444903 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2006861856 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2008240025 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2024627203 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2038702827 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2042739860 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2045934080 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2051598779 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2053634889 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2058467981 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2065957901 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2081163916 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2085521394 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2092392128 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2098444097 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2105811463 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2106096361 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2114961031 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2117066731 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2120440106 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2123821623 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2124761614 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2139736795 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2140774169 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2141093480 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2147394548 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2153610778 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2153901098 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2154620130 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2157575844 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2158023137 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2161497363 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2166083639 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2167131560 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2171515724 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2172273046 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W218748829 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2293343794 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2325048191 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2329460402 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2335596172 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2348832496 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2410529574 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2414668644 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2512717763 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2573073967 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2578235446 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2581974275 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2618535072 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2770912535 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2792056902 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2903496861 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2916282777 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2946247786 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W2961174596 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W3124048027 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W4211075179 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W4256144711 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W4256220928 @default.
- W4225533143 cites W4361743007 @default.
- W4225533143 doi "https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2022.00646" @default.
- W4225533143 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
- W4225533143 type Work @default.
- W4225533143 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W4225533143 countsByYear W42255331432022 @default.
- W4225533143 countsByYear W42255331432023 @default.
- W4225533143 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4225533143 hasAuthorship W4225533143A5020217900 @default.
- W4225533143 hasAuthorship W4225533143A5040425987 @default.
- W4225533143 hasAuthorship W4225533143A5046897694 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C138496976 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C174107131 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
- W4225533143 hasConcept C2776420229 @default.