FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225545013> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225545013 endingPage "1125" @default.
• W4225545013 startingPage "1112" @default.
• W4225545013 abstract "Osteochondral lesions of the talus are common, particularly after trauma. Arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation has emerged as the first-choice surgical treatment for small primary lesions less than 100 mm2. Individual studies on the topic are small and heterogeneous, and they have differed in their main findings; for this reason, systematically reviewing the available evidence seems important.In this systematic review, we asked: (1) What patient-reported outcomes and pain scores have been observed after arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for secondary osteochondral lesions of the talus? (2) What complications were reported? (3) What demographic and clinical factors were reported to be associated with better patient-reported outcome scores?We performed a systematic review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using Embase, EmCare, PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus (databases last searched June 23, 2021). A two-stage title/abstract and full-text screening process was performed independently by two reviewers. Randomized control trials, cohort studies, and observational studies published in English that evaluated the outcome of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for secondary osteochondral lesions of the talus were included. Case reports, review articles, commentaries, abstracts, and letters to the editor were excluded. A total of 12 articles (10 case series and two retrospective comparative studies) involving 446 patients were included. Of these, 111 patients with a mean age of 33 years (range 20 to 49) received arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for a secondary osteochondral lesion of the talus. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to assess the methodologic quality of included studies. The MINORS is a numerical score ranging from 0 to 16 for studies with no comparison group and 0 to 24 for comparative studies, with higher quality studies receiving higher scores. Of the 10 noncomparative case series, the highest score was 10 of 16, with a median (range) score of 7.5 (4 to 10), while the two comparative studies scored 22 of 24 and 19 of 24, respectively.Studies varied widely in terms of patient-reported outcome measures such as the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS), with inconsistent reporting across studies regarding whether or how much patients improved; there was variation in some effect sizes with regard to improvement seeming close to or below the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Although no perioperative complications were reported in any included studies, 34% (26 of 77, in seven studies that reported on this endpoint) of patients who underwent a revision procedure. One study found a negative association between lesion size and AOFAS and VAS score. No other studies reported on factors associated with patient-reported outcome scores, and most studies were far too small to explore relationships of this sort.We found that arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation for secondary osteochondral lesions of the talus yielded inconsistent and often small improvements in patient-reported outcomes, with approximately one in three patients undergoing a revision procedure. Reported outcomes likely represent a best-case scenario, inflated by low-level study designs and major sources of bias that are known to make treatment effects seem larger than they are. Therefore, the use of arthroscopic bone marrow stimulation in such patients cannot be recommended, unless we are able to refine selection criteria to effectively identify patients who show a substantial clinical benefit.Level IV, therapeutic study." @default.
• W4225545013 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225545013 creator A5002171592 @default.
• W4225545013 creator A5056041416 @default.
• W4225545013 creator A5078507834 @default.
• W4225545013 creator A5083368559 @default.
• W4225545013 date "2022-02-07" @default.
• W4225545013 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4225545013 title "Should Arthroscopic Bone Marrow Stimulation Be Used in the Management of Secondary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus? A Systematic Review" @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1795702683 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1837661911 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1904077183 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1957937187 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1969015300 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1976927873 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W1994662417 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2002830044 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2006106654 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2006310477 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2009788047 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2021953069 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2037396669 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2044821056 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2046438935 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2059440125 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2078312939 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2088449269 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2089841701 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2100445448 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2225400113 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2265877516 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2310148368 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2325365556 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2329863355 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2553323970 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2560438049 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2569161320 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2588770740 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2608409689 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2727712296 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W2769011346 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3091566607 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3108968748 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3112638118 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3131973917 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3135082569 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3158867793 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3163294107 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3175604438 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W3175854237 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W4233775049 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W4237695337 @default.
• W4225545013 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4225545013 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002134" @default.
• W4225545013 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35130190" @default.
• W4225545013 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4225545013 type Work @default.
• W4225545013 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W4225545013 countsByYear W42255450132022 @default.
• W4225545013 countsByYear W42255450132023 @default.
• W4225545013 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225545013 hasAuthorship W4225545013A5002171592 @default.
• W4225545013 hasAuthorship W4225545013A5056041416 @default.
• W4225545013 hasAuthorship W4225545013A5078507834 @default.
• W4225545013 hasAuthorship W4225545013A5083368559 @default.
• W4225545013 hasBestOaLocation W42255450131 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C2780007613 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C2781156865 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C118552586 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C141071460 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C142724271 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C168563851 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C17744445 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C1862650 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C189708586 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C199539241 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C23131810 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C27415008 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C2779473830 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C2780007613 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C2781145037 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C2781156865 @default.
• W4225545013 hasConceptScore W4225545013C71924100 @default.
• W4225545013 hasIssue "6" @default.

• next