FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4225568677> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4225568677 endingPage "168" @default.
• W4225568677 startingPage "131" @default.
• W4225568677 abstract "PURPOSE: While there is abundant literature on the key determinants of reward-based crowdfunding success, little research is dedicated to crowdfunding projects that are not only successful but receive significantly more funds than initially targeted through the defined funding goal. This study seeks to shed light on this vastly neglected topic in crowdfunding research. METHODOLOGY: Drawing on a rich dataset of 338 rewardbased crowdfunding projects, this study applied a two-step statistical analysis. First, regression analyses to determine relevant crowdfunding success factors were conducted in order to corroborate extant literature and to highlight that the data properly reflects the already identified key findings on crowdfunding success. In a second step, the very same factors were investigated for the case of overfunded projects, utilizing logistic regression analyses and a Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition. FINDINGS: Although this study confirmed the findings of previous research considering the factors that increase the success probability of crowdfunding projects, the very same factors turned out to not explain the emergence of project overfunding. For instance, while project founders can provide updates, a higher number of different rewards, or utilize social media pages to increase the likelihood for success, these factors do not contribute to explain the phenomenon of project overfunding. IMPLICATIONS: The results of this study emphasize that in order to understand overfunding of crowdfunding projects, future research must go beyond the basic crowdfunding success factors. Building on the notion of the Two-Factor Theory, the findings suggest that the factors contributing to success can be considered hygiene factors that are required to succeed in the first place. However, these factors do not motivate the crowd to provide further funding to an already successful project. Hence the motivating factors remain yet unobserved in extant literature. In practice, this means that project teams achieving their funding goal cannot rely on the same factors that were helpful to succeed to encourage further funding from the crowd. The differentiation of hygiene and motivating factors for overfunding in reward-based crowdfunding offers rich opportunities for future research. More subjective factors, such as the individual perception of crowd members towards crowdfunding projects, are suggested to play an important role for the occurrence of project overfunding. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: By investigating project overfunding, this study addresses the research gap concerning the factors contributing to the emergence of project overfunding. There is little evidence on the characteristics of overfunded crowdfunding projects, and thus this study provides essential theoretical and empirical groundwork for future research to build upon this study’s results." @default.
• W4225568677 created "2022-05-05" @default.
• W4225568677 creator A5054321297 @default.
• W4225568677 date "2022-01-01" @default.
• W4225568677 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4225568677 title "The impact of common success factors on overfunding in reward-based crowdfunding: An explorative study and avenues for future research" @default.
• W4225568677 doi "https://doi.org/10.7341/20221815" @default.
• W4225568677 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4225568677 type Work @default.
• W4225568677 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W4225568677 countsByYear W42255686772023 @default.
• W4225568677 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4225568677 hasAuthorship W4225568677A5054321297 @default.
• W4225568677 hasBestOaLocation W42255686771 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C178300618 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C178550888 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C2985625233 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C10138342 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C119857082 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C144133560 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C151956035 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C162853370 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C178300618 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C178550888 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C182306322 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C2985625233 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C41008148 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C78458016 @default.
• W4225568677 hasConceptScore W4225568677C86803240 @default.
• W4225568677 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4225568677 hasLocation W42255686771 @default.
• W4225568677 hasLocation W42255686772 @default.
• W4225568677 hasOpenAccess W4225568677 @default.
• W4225568677 hasPrimaryLocation W42255686771 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W1978505276 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W1988022704 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W1995999171 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W2010805752 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W2136710333 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W2367777266 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W2793845994 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W281246900 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W3132716659 @default.
• W4225568677 hasRelatedWork W4206036160 @default.
• W4225568677 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W4225568677 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4225568677 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4225568677 workType "article" @default.